Why does it matter what his position is? Sounds like they had a forged LOA
from the customer and that they fixed the issue when they found out about it.
I am not sure you can ask too much more from a network operator, the best
thing we can hope for are companies that will cancel customers i
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Matt Larson wrote:
> As part of the deployment of DNSSEC in .com, the zone has been signed
> and in a "deliberately unvalidatable" state for several weeks. Late
> last week the .com key material was unobscured and the actual keys
> have been visible in the zone si
This OT, and for those of you with virgin ears, don't read more. This is
specifically to Ronald:
Maybe, if you didn't act like a flaming douchebag, and were polite to
people, they would be more interested in helping you out. Learn to use some
fucking manners. Every single message I've seen from yo
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Brett Watson wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> (Sorry, but I can't help snickering a bit at your _prior_ employment.
>> As I feel sure you are already painfully aware, having that on your
>> resume does not exactly inspire a wh
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Stefan Fouant
wrote:
>
> +1 | That, or "The evangelist formerly known as Owen..." :p
No no ... TEFKAO.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:14 PM, "Joao C. Mendes Ogawa"
wrote:
> FYI
>
> --Jonny Ogawa
>
> - Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
>
> From: Stephen H. Inden
> Subject: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:19:08 +0200
> To: Global Environment Watch (
FYI
--Jonny Ogawa
- Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
From: Stephen H. Inden
Subject: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:19:08 +0200
To: Global Environment Watch (GEW) mailing list
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> (Sorry, but I can't help snickering a bit at your _prior_ employment.
> As I feel sure you are already painfully aware, having that on your
> resume does not exactly inspire a whole lotta confidence in the notion
> that you are a straight
In message ,
rr wrote:
>Hmm, thought it was a NANOG prerequisite to be able to do a google
>search. Should be pretty easy to find this info with that tool in your
>handbag.
Which info is that, exactly? Your title at Integra Telecom?
Umm... well... yes I guess this is you, right?
http:/
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen on w
>> I for one would put money on the table towards the "rename Owen to Mr.
>> IPv6"
>> effort. I think it would be wonderful to be able to honestly say
>> "IPv6 is in da
>> house!" every time the person formerly known as Owen walked into the
>> room at ARIN meetings. :D
"Like a v6, like a v6" c
On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matthew Petach [mailto:mpet...@netflight.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:28 PM
>>
>> I for one would put money on the table towards the "rename Owen to Mr.
>> IPv6"
>> effort. I think it would be
Hmm, thought it was a NANOG prerequisite to be able to do a google
search. Should be pretty easy to find this info with that tool in your
handbag.
With the above tool I've got your phone # and would be happy to call
you if you'd like clarification on our process.
Please just reply to me off-list.
As part of the deployment of DNSSEC in .com, the zone has been signed
and in a "deliberately unvalidatable" state for several weeks. Late
last week the .com key material was unobscured and the actual keys
have been visible in the zone since March 24.
The final step in the deployment was publishin
In message ,
rr wrote:
>For the record, Integra Telecom did have LOA for said netblock.
>Needless to say LOA was forged on company letterhead with appropriate
>signatures. Once brought to our attention we attempted to contact
>customer to no avail, netblock has been removed until they prove
>oth
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Petach [mailto:mpet...@netflight.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:28 PM
>
> I for one would put money on the table towards the "rename Owen to Mr.
> IPv6"
> effort. I think it would be wonderful to be able to honestly say
> "IPv6 is in da
> hou
Hello
I am looking for people who has space and / or network in Terremark culpeper ,
please contact me off-list ( or people who is planning to get there sometime
soon..)
mehmet
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
...
> Seriously, I was left with the impression that if IPv6 were a person, it
> would be you, and that if it were a company, you would be the majority
> shareholder. (Not that there would be anything wrong with that.)
I for one would
On 03/31/2011 12:12 PM, rr wrote:
For the record, Integra Telecom did have LOA for said netblock.
Needless to say LOA was forged on company letterhead with appropriate
signatures. Once brought to our attention we attempted to contact
customer to no avail, netblock has been removed until they prov
For the record, Integra Telecom did have LOA for said netblock.
Needless to say LOA was forged on company letterhead with appropriate
signatures. Once brought to our attention we attempted to contact
customer to no avail, netblock has been removed until they prove
otherwise.
Randy Rooney
On Thu,
On 03/30/2011 03:53 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I just stumbled onto this one the other day.
Apparently, Spamhaus has known about this one for THREE MONTHS already:
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL98308
It's being routed by AS11730, aka "Circle Internet LTD", a known spam
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Tony Tauber wrote:
> I don't believe this record indicates that Level3 proxy registered the route
> object.
> It means that someone used the DBANK-MNT maintainer ID in the Level3 RR to
> enter a route object 18 months ago.
>
possibly...
> It looks like Level3 is
I don't believe this record indicates that Level3 proxy registered the route
object.
It means that someone used the DBANK-MNT maintainer ID in the Level3 RR to
enter a route object 18 months ago.
It looks like Level3 is originating the route in AS3356, not accepting it
from AS13767 (which is what
In message ,
Owen DeLong wrote:
>Cleaning up the routing {is not what ARIN does or thinks it should do}, true.
>
>However, this sounds like there are two issues...
>
>1. Routing -- Would be nice if the advertising provider(s) stopped doing
> so. Not something ARIN can really do much
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>
>>> It also needs
>>>
>>> 1. Someone to complain to law enforcement
>>>
>> True,
>
> as has been brought up in the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>> It also needs
>>
>> 1. Someone to complain to law enforcement
>>
> True,
as has been brought up in the past here... some folk rely heavily upon
IRR data for route prefix filter
In message ,
Brandon Ross wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Ross Harvey wrote:
>
>> Wait a second, I'm pretty sure that in most contexts, a signature or
>> letterhead means not so much "this is real because it's so obviously
>> genuine", but rather:
>>
>> "This is real or I am willing to take a forg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy.
We're conducting a statistical overview of peering sessions for a research
paper. The paper we produce will be input into OECD guidelines on national
communications regulatory frameworks, so we'd very much like it to accurately
reflect the
28 matches
Mail list logo
