Re: How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?
* Graham Beneke > Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in. Hi, Actually, they're already empty. Chinanet Fujian Province Network allocated 498432 addresses today, spread out over 1102(!) individual prefixes in the range /21-/24. Unless any resources has been returned to the free pool today, there's nothing left in the APNIC pool outside of the 103/8 block, which is the one set aside for the final /8 policy. Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
How is IPv6 deployment going in the APNIC region?
Only 0.3 of a /8 left[1] before the rationing policy kicks in. I hope everyone is ready :-) [1] http://www.apnic.net/community/ipv4-exhaustion/graphical-information -- Graham Beneke
Looking for Postmaster contact for js.pentagon.mil
We have a client that we resent moved to some new address space (We have had the the space for a couple of years now) However it looks like the mail server for js.pentagon.mil are droping all packet to them. :( If anyone had some leads on a way to contact them. Please contact me off-list. We did try the number in the whois for the IP. The phone rang and rang. :( Thank you all. Sincerely, Mark Keymer
Re: Syngenta space
Sometimes with alternate propulsion: http://img24.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc188&image=ab44c_incroyable.jpg On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Lynda wrote: > On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >>> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, >>> >> >> and pigs fly >> > > Well, sometimes they do. > > http://wardsci.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_IG0035229 > > [Flying Pig: Unforgettable Fun with Physics] > > -- > "The person becomes vulnerable to all manner of fads, such as > astrology, superstitions, economics, and tarot-card reading." > > The Black Swan, by Nassim Nicholas Taleb > >
Re: Syngenta space
On 4/13/11 4:50 PM, Leigh Porter wrote: > On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > and pigs fly >>> Well, sometimes they do. >> There underlying problem here is flying sheep: >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY >> >> Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue. >> > Yes that's it. 172/8 is nesting. Perhaps if 172/8 and 168/8 get together and > mate they will produce lots of little /16s and > We won't have to implement IPv6 What a MASSIVE time savings. VACATION HERE I COME!
Re: Syngenta space
On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: >>> and pigs fly >> Well, sometimes they do. > > There underlying problem here is flying sheep: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY > > Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue. > Yes that's it. 172/8 is nesting. Perhaps if 172/8 and 168/8 get together and mate they will produce lots of little /16s and -- Leigh __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __
Re: Syngenta space
and pigs fly Well, sometimes they do. There underlying problem here is flying sheep: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.
Re: Syngenta space
On Apr 13, 2:44 pm, Randy Bush wrote: > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly And to think, Google manages to get by with the equivalents of a few / 16 or smaller.
Re: Syngenta space
On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly Well, sometimes they do. http://wardsci.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_IG0035229 [Flying Pig: Unforgettable Fun with Physics] -- "The person becomes vulnerable to all manner of fads, such as astrology, superstitions, economics, and tarot-card reading." The Black Swan, by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Re: Syngenta space
On 4/13/11 6:11 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16 > however. > > Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to > iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks! > 23173jjaeggli:~ jjaeggli$ ssh rvi...@route-views.routeviews.org route-views> show bgp ipv4 unicast 147.0.0.0/8 longer-prefixes ... route-views>show bgp ipv4 unicast 168.246.0.0/16 longer-prefixes route-views>
Re: Syngenta space
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, Bugger. Now I have to renumber out of my 172.16/12 subnets :-(
Re: Syngenta space
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:44:19 +0900, Randy Bush said: > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly Only if they're RFC1925 compliant. :) pgpNN8r9epD9z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Syngenta space
On 04/13/2011 12:44, Randy Bush wrote: sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly /me pops open the kevlar umbrella (thanks for the warning!) -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Re: Syngenta space
On 13 Apr 2011, at 20:44, Randy Bush wrote: >> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly > You can make almost anything fly if you put enough oomph behind it.. -- Leigh __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __
Re: Syngenta space
Ill throw in 10.0.0.0 /8 for just the lint, but it better be really good lint From: Paul Graydon To: nanog@nanog.org Date: 04/13/2011 03:54 PM Subject:Re: Syngenta space On 04/13/2011 09:48 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >>> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, >> and pigs fly > indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all? > *checks pockets* $5 and some lint?
Re: Syngenta space
On 04/13/2011 09:48 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all? *checks pockets* $5 and some lint?
Re: Syngenta space
>>> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >>> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, >> and pigs fly > indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all? i am particularly impressed by the annexation of some of the rfc1918 space. randy
Re: Syngenta space
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says >> they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > > and pigs fly indeed, an impressive claim, how much for it all?
Re: Syngenta space
> sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, and pigs fly
Re: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > This is not true. There are several works out there showing that the FIB will > not grow as you are saying. Having taken some time to discuss this off-list with Luigi. I'd already read the paper he had in mind, which does not address DoS or prefix growth as the number of multi-homed sites, or single-homed sites with "PI blocks," increases. In effect, that paper and other works on this subject fail to consider what happens when one of LISP's goals actually becomes true: more wide-spread adoption of its technology to enable branch offices and other end-users to become multi-homed, or avoid renumbering. Plain and simple, it does not scale up any better than injecting more routes into the DFZ, unless you 1) accept macro-flow-based routing; or 2) scale up the size of your FIB along with the much larger number of prefixes which would be introduced by lowering the barrier-to-entry for multi-homing and provider-independent addressing. However, LISP does have non-Internet applications which are interesting. You can potentially have multi-homed connectivity between your own branch offices, using one or more public Internet connections at each branch, and your own private mapping servers which know the state of reachability from one branch to the others. In effect, it can become "poor man's L3VPN." Beyond non-Internet applications such as this, I think LISP is useful largely as a case study for what happens when a bunch of engineers get together and "solve" some problems they do not understand -- DFZ size/growth being chief among them. Like others, I still leave room for the possibility that I am wrong about this. -- Jeff S Wheeler Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
historical pricing data
This may be the wrong place to ask but maybe one of you could point me in a direction. I'm looking for [ideally] historical market pricing for mpls/ipl between as many as possible city pairs [with a focus toward Asia] as well as ip maybe 5 year back. Thanks, Chris
SDH 1+1 protected circuit and OSPF minimal setup on a single Juniper platform.
Hi,
I have some doubts about the minimal configuration to handle an SDH 1+1
protected circuit with OSPF on a single Juniper router platform (one
interface as the Working Circuit and another interface as the Protect
Circuit).
Reading the JunOS documentation, for instance the 9.4 JunOS version:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-network-interfaces/interfaces-configuring-sonet-sdh-physical-interface-properties.html#id-12712165
and using the various configuration snippet I tried to link together
various pieces of configuration and the result is below:
so-0/2/0 {
framing {
sdh;
}
sonet-options {
aps {
working-circuit bayward;
authentication-key blarney;
}
}
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.100.100.1/24;
}
}
}
so-1/3/0 {
framing {
sdh;
}
sonet-options {
aps {
protect-circuit bayward;
authentication-key blarney;
}
}
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.100.200.1/24;
}
}
}
lab@r1# show protocols ospf
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface so-0/2/0.0;
interface so-1/3/0.0;
}
}
If I'm not wrong the APS/MSP signaling protocol router implementation
should set one of the two sonet interfaces as Up and the other as Down,
so the OSPF should install in routing table only the IP network related
to the Up interface.
Am I wrong?
Do you think I forgot some configuration pieces?
Thanks and regards,
Lorenzo
RE: Syngenta space
> -Original Message- > From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eu...@leitl.org] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:11 AM > To: NANOG list > Subject: Syngenta space > > Hi, > > sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says > they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, > which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16 > however. > > Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to > iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks! > I just scraped the BGP output from one of my border routers and came up with discrete more specific routes and AS's in all three blocks. Given that Sygenta doesn't appear to have an AS, we can assume they are not amongst them. Regards, Mike
Re: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative?
I would look into Asatro, they have a solid product and good support. If you want a contact person let me know and I will email you directly. On 4/9/11 11:55 AM, pr...@cnsny.net wrote: Andrew, We use and offer Postini - a front end service. Postini is a anti virus and spam filter, and can spool mail if your circuits are down. Postini is a Google company and works like a charm. If you need more information please contact me offline pr...@cnsny.net Paul Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone - Reply message - From: "Andrew Kirch" Date: Sat, Apr 9, 2011 10:39 am Subject: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative? To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)", John, My suggestion isn't _QUITE_ an appliance, but it works very well and I've been exceptionally happy with it. It's a distribution of linux controlled via a web interface that does far more than just mail filtering (at which it is both flexible and adept). Take a look at http://www.clearfoundation.com/Software/overview.html. The hardware requirements shouldn't be too insane, and the rules updates/subscriptions for the various services are all month to month, and not a bucket of insane. Andrew On 4/8/2011 11:51 PM, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote: OK, its been a year since my Barracuda subscription expired. The unit still stops some spam. I figured that I would go and see what they would do if I tried to renew my subscription EXACTLY one year after it expired. Would their renewal website say "Oh, you are at your anniversary date", and renew me for a year? No such luck: They want me to PAY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR for which I did NOT receive service and then for the current (upcoming year). Sorry - I don't allow myself to be ripped off like that. Sorry Barracuda - you get no money from me and I'll tell everyone I know about this policy of yours. I posted an article about this unscrupulous practice on my blog last year at http://www.john-palmer.net/wordpress/?p=46 My question is - does anyone have any suggestions for another e-mail appliance like the Barracuda Spam Firewall that doesn't try to charge their customers for time not used. I should be able to shut off the unit for a year or whatever and simply renew from the point that I re-activate the unit instead of having to pay for back-years that I didn't use. Thanks
Syngenta space
Hi, sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8, which is obviously bogus. They do have a 168.246.0.0/16 however. Any tool to look the other two up quickly, without having to iterate through the entire second octet? Thanks! -- Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl http://leitl.org __ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
