On (2011-04-29 18:34 -0400), david raistrick wrote:
3) as an a midstream network provider I have almost no motivation to
support this. Sure, my network usage would be reduced - but I (more
or less simplified here, but) make my living on each bit of traffic
I carry - if I offered a way for
On 30/04/2011, at 5:44 AM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Delivering multicast to end users is fundamentally not hard. The
biggest issue seems to be with residential CPE (pretty much the same
problem as IPv6, really).
Well, more than that, since I don't really want my DSL pipe saturated
On Friday, April 29, 2011 03:37:04 PM Jay Ashworth wrote:
You've conflated my two points. That would tell the *carriers* who's watching
what, but they probably don't care. I was talking about *the providers*
knowing (think DRM and 3096 viewers online).
And then if there's music, the
On Friday, April 29, 2011 05:16:51 PM George Bonser wrote:
But if broadcast events over the internet are treated the same as
broadcast events over RF, who cares?
They're not; that's the problem. For the US, at least, the Copyright Office of
the Library of Congress has statutory authority in
Once upon a time, Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de said:
That reminds me of 9/11. When the tragic event unfolded, we sat in the
office. News made the rounds verbally, and people started looking for
streaming services at their personal desks (no TVs around). People
pretty quickly gave up trying to
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Chris Adams wrote:
I can also see how this affects the ISPs providing bandwidth to the
content providers. In our colo for example, we rate-limit customers to
the paid-for bandwidth at the colo port. With multicast however, they
could use significantly more bandwidth,
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:34:15 -0700, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org said:
So the first user in a router tunes to a multicast stream. Consumption
for the ISP and all the routers in the chain to the source: same as if
it were a
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:57:42 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
There's a layer 9 (or is it 10? wry grin -- required for legal reasons)
answer for that.
This layer goes to 11...
:)
pgpaSdXsuQH8i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
8 matches
Mail list logo
