The IPv6 version of www.qwest.com has been down for 10 days. Wget shows a
301 to www.centurylink.com, but that also fails. Emails to the nocs at both
companies have gone unanswered. Unless HE is deployed in a web browser,
this behavior leads to a bad end-user experience.
If anyone can prod eith
Thanks for the tip (BTW, top-post haters, I didn't start it!). I was quickly
delisted by SpamCop, but here is their response:
--
Once all spam issues have been addressed, **reputation recovery can take
anywhere
from a few hours to __just over one week__ to improve**, depending on the
speci
In sort, wait... Once you're de-listed from SpamCop (which is owned by
IronPort and plays a non-trivial part in their SenderBase scoring) you
should find that your reputation increases fairly quickly - normally within
24 hours presuming that the spam has actually stopped.
Scott.
On Wed, Aug 1
Måns,
I have personally done what you describe, I always (ab)use 3G on the x2000
from stockholm to göteborg :)
When SL first rolled out 3G on the x2000 sometime around 2001 I think, I
remember probing around and figuring out that it was built on 2x3G with some
kind of embedded linux board as route
On 8/17/2011 10:57 AM, u...@3.am wrote:
However, "Senderbase", apparently used in Cisco's Ironport, will let you look up
your IP and tell you that your reputation is "poor", but offers no way to get
delisted. It refers you to Spamcop, which I imagine they rely on for listings,
but not delisting
We weren't listed in the PSBL. First thing I did was a few multi-DNSBL lookups
and only found a couple of obscure (to me) ones, which I immediately filled out
for delisting.
Interestingly, comcast.net was BLing us, complete with URL to do apply for
delisting. I did, and got a response that we w
We had two users fall for a phishing email recently, and of course the result
was
that he gave his user/pass to a spammer. We caught one of them in time, but the
other got out many thousands of spam the other night before being discovered.
I am in the process of cleaning this up. Spamcop and ot
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Chris wrote:
> http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=233447973367229
>
> I have been getting people to click "Report Event" at the bottom and
> had the website in "step 5" shutdown so much that they flocked to
> Blogspot. Does anyone have an idea who the advertise
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=233447973367229
I have been getting people to click "Report Event" at the bottom and
had the website in "step 5" shutdown so much that they flocked to
Blogspot. Does anyone have an idea who the advertiser of the survey
scam is on the Blogspot page so I can get
The iPhone 5 must have came out early...
Not sure if anyone is aware / cares, but Apple's online store appears
to be down.
http://www.downornot.com/store.apple
I can ping the IP (17.112.156.51) and DNS is resolving. But that's about it.
--Jaren
The .129 is our peer to cogent, it just drops the traffic now..
Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms 172.25.0.1
2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 10.250.0.129
3 10.250.0.129 reports: Destination host unreachable.
T
On 8/17/2011 9:13 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:07 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Robert Glover wrote:
Hello,
We have noticed that from our Cogent link (as well as from ALL U.S. based
points we tested via the Cogent Looking Glass:
http://
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Charles N Wyble wrote:
On 08/15/2011 10:14 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Graham Wooden wrote:
If I understand your question, yes. We did this some time ago. Colo
in various ILEC and CLEC central offices,
Um. Doesn't colo in various ILEC/CLEC CO == facilities
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
> Sent: 17 August 2011 14:52
> To: Paul
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
>
> > What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
> > breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE? Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:49:38AM
> -0400 Quoting chris (tknch...@gmail.com):
>> Overall, IMO the trends are just seem to be going backwards. We have more
>> speed but we can use it less? What kind of te
On 8/17/11 9:50 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
>> breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
>> has good experience with OSPF?
> what would you rather rely on at three in the morning when things are
> breaking,
On Aug 17, 2011 6:58 AM, "Justin M. Streiner"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>>> What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
>>> breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
>>> has good experience with OSPF?
>>
>>
>> what would
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Randy Bush wrote:
What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
has good experience with OSPF?
what would you rather rely on at three in the morning when things are
breaking, someone
> What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
> breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
> has good experience with OSPF?
what would you rather rely on at three in the morning when things are
breaking, someone who has just learned OSPF or someone
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE? Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:49:38AM
> -0400 Quoting chris (tknch...@gmail.com):
>
> OTOH, never underestimate "Because we can".
in their own words (vzw)[1]:
"Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) provided
On Aug 17, 2011, at 1:07 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Robert Glover wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have noticed that from our Cogent link (as well as from ALL U.S. based
>> points we tested via the Cogent Looking Glass:
>> http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking
On 8/16/2011 6:17 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
On 08/16/2011 03:28 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 8/12/2011 7:28 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
Hey all,
I have one rack of stuff..:)
Not Enough! We will be removing you now from the list that is. :)
I then have my tower(custom build) and ups
Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE? Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:25:05PM
-0400 Quoting Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.com):
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
> > Really, any phone you buy free and clear without
> > subsidy and contract should work fine as a ph
24 matches
Mail list logo
