Howdy,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
On 10/13/11 3:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
In fact, Skype, just as a for instance, is worse on hotel wifi as
launching the app on a laptop makes you
We've used them extensively in our network for years (we have about 2,600 of
them in the network). They actually used to be Ceterus devices (it's possible
that Hatteras merged with Ceterus or something, but I'm not up on my vendor
acquisition current events). We mostly use the UTS 810 and
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, ML wrote:
On 10/14/2011 03:21 PM, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote:
List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global)
-
Maybe I'm just not in the know on this but if these prefixes/ASes shouldn't
be seen on the internet, shouldn't
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this
any more.
Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this report?
thanks,
Geoff
While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report also
just part of the spam load on this list?
regards,
Geoff
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this
any more.
Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this report?
thanks,
Geoff
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
reads this any more.
some read it. we are the frustrated ones.
no one seems to act on it.
Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with
this report?
not clear, sad to say.
i really think that the
On 10/15/2011 4:26 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report also
just part of the spam load on this list?
I read both of them, and also the Weekly Routing Report. I will regret
the loss, and consider all three to be far more valuable
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:26:36 +1100
Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report also
just part of the spam load on this list?
If you don't want them, filter them to /dev/null.
regards,
Geoff
--
John
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Lynda wrote:
On 10/15/2011 4:26 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report
also just part of the spam load on this list?
I read both of them, and also the Weekly Routing Report. I will regret the
loss, and consider
On Oct 15, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
reads this any more.
some read it. we are the frustrated ones.
Some read it. I think everyone on NANOG is frustrated (or not paying
attention).
I would suggest that you
Matt Taylor writes:
Would love to see some bandwidth graphs. :)
Here's one from another network.
attachment: akamai-week.pngGuess it was a good idea to upgrade that Akamai cluster's uplink to
10GE, even though 2*GE (or was it 4*GE) looked sufficient at the time.
Remember folks, overprovisioning
+1
good to get a view from multiple sources even if they are automated. Should
be easy enough to filter for those that do not want them.
2011/10/15 William F. Maton Sotomayor wma...@ottix.net
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Lynda wrote:
On 10/15/2011 4:26 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
While I am at it,
Geoff Huston writes:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top
offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list
(doesn't happen frequently; more often for the BGP updates report than
for CIDR), I may send
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:51:55 -0700
Lynda shr...@deaddrop.org wrote:
I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to. Please
don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and
realized that the setting had changed, and that I was trapped into
replying to
John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on
Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public
service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
I don't see that; I have to specifically
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on
Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public
service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/11 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps
only on Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm
doing the public service of pointing it out,
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Simon Leinen wrote:
Ditto here.
-Hank
Geoff Huston writes:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top
offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list
(doesn't happen frequently;
On 10/15/2011 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lyndashr...@deaddrop.org
I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to.
Please don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and
realized that the setting had changed, and that
Simon Leinen wrote:
Guess it was a good idea to upgrade that Akamai cluster's uplink to
10GE, even though 2*GE (or was it 4*GE) looked sufficient at the time.
Remember folks, overprovisioning is a misnomer, it should be
I read it every week. It's a finger on the pulse of a system on which I am
totally dependent...
Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this
any more.
Is there any good reason
I read it every week. It's a finger on the pulse of a system on which
I am totally dependent...
the email i want to see here is i wuz a polluter, but i read the cidr
report, i haz seen the light, and i'm gonna stop polluting.
no, i am not holding my breath.
randy
those who read it and follow routing best practicez will continue to do those,
those who havent yet given a shit wont get a sudden dose of exlax after seeing
their asn in it.
--srs (iPad)
On 16-Oct-2011, at 5:47, joe...@bogus.com joe...@bogus.com wrote:
I read it every week. It's a finger
On Oct 15, 2011, at 20:06, J na...@namor.ca wrote:
Simon Leinen wrote:
Guess it was a good idea to upgrade that Akamai cluster's uplink to
10GE, even though 2*GE (or was it 4*GE) looked sufficient at the time.
Remember folks, overprovisioning is a misnomer, it should be called
provisioning
we lost Jon.
It feels like just yesterday.
http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.html
Yes..and we all owe him a debt of gratitude.
--- On Sat, 10/15/11, Rodney Joffe rjo...@centergate.com wrote:
From: Rodney Joffe rjo...@centergate.com
Subject: 13 years ago today - October 16, 1998...
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Saturday, October 15, 2011, 7:14 PM
we lost Jon.
It feels like
- Original Message -
From: Rodney Joffe rjo...@centergate.com
Subject: 13 years ago today - October 16, 1998...
we lost Jon.
It feels like just yesterday.
http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.html
My path didn't cross Jon's much... but he was nice enough to reserve the
really
On 10/15/11 11:21 PM, Randy Epstein repst...@hostleasing.net wrote:
Betty,
I believe there was a problem with the voting system this past election.
Proposed amendment 1, which I voted NO on, did not register. It does not
show a vote in the ballot confirmation email (well, it just doesn't say
I read them all too.
BUT, I get some 5 or 6 copies of them from all the lists I am on. I would
rather subscribe to a list that was just for those.
…Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellego.netmailto:ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383
John,
Bit hard for Geoff to devnull them, he is the author ;-)
…Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO - eintellego Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellego.netmailto:ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
I agree with Skeeve that it hits a number of lists, but I think that is
a good thing and is of value.
I agree with others who have said that there is any amount of worthless
noise on lists and we can just filter if not required.
Personally iirc, it was this content that led me to find
On 10/15/2011 10:48 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
I read them all too.
BUT, I get some 5 or 6 copies of them from all the lists I am on. I would
rather subscribe to a list that was just for those.
+1. Or an rss feed or something.
That way interested folks could easily pull the data and stay up
BUT, I get some 5 or 6 copies of them from all the lists I am on. I
would rather subscribe to a list that was just for those.
procmail is your friend
# prevent dupes
#
:0 Whc: msgid.lock
| formail -D 65536 msgid.cache
:0 a:0
$TRASH
I may not read it for the purpose of aggregation, but it is useful data to
me for other purposes.
As long as there is one person talking and at least one person listening, a
thread is in order, and it isn't spam.
On Oct 15, 2011 3:25 PM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
From what I learned at
Ditto, and I do find it informative.
Jim
On Oct 15, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Kyle Creyts kyle.cre...@gmail.com wrote:
I may not read it for the purpose of aggregation, but it is useful data to
me for other purposes.
As long as there is one person talking and at least one person listening, a
36 matches
Mail list logo
