Re: ab...@brasiltelecom.com.br Contact - Re: http://ipcacoal.org/ipcacoal/includes/kiwi.htm

2011-11-19 Thread goemon
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, Don Gould wrote: Anyone with any clue on how to contact ab...@brasiltelecom.com.br like to forward this? Their abuse contact in the whois database is just bouncing. I think most sane operators totally blocked brasiltelecom ages ago. I would like to see the community addr

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Joel M Snyder
>I'd like to fully search on an 'column', a la 'ladder logic' style., >as well as have the data presented in an orderly well-defined fashion. Yes, Splunk. See: http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2011/092611-splunk-test-250836.html for a recent Network World test of Splunk which may help. jms

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Duane Toler
On Nov 19, 2011, at 9:05 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: Ah, this totally makes sense now. I can see why you'd want to use features that are already on your ASAs. Sounds like a bug to me, though. I wonder what Cisco calls syslog-tls though. Syslog-like packet bodies, over a TLS-wrapped TCP socket? S

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Beavis
+1 here i use splunk for sorting out logs pretty cool tool. easy to install. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Mike Lyon wrote: > Check out Splunk (www.splunk.com) > > -mike > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 19, 2011, at 16:51, Duane Toler wrote: > >> Hey NANOG! >> >> My employer is deploying CI

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Duane Toler wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 20:30, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Duane Toler wrote: > >> > >> Hey NANOG! > >> > >> My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients > >> (specifically the 5505, 5510 for o

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Duane Toler
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 20:30, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Duane Toler wrote: >> >> Hey NANOG! >> >> My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients >> (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients).  We are having >> problems finding a decent log

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Duane Toler
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 20:04, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Duane Toler" > >> My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients >> (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients). We are having >> problems finding a decent log viewer. Several produc

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Duane Toler wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 20:04, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> From: "Duane Toler" > > > >> My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients > >> (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients). We

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Jonathan Lassoff
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Duane Toler wrote: > Hey NANOG! > > My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients > (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients). We are having > problems finding a decent log viewer. Several products seem to mean > well, but they all fall

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Mike Lyon
Check out Splunk (www.splunk.com) -mike Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 16:51, Duane Toler wrote: > Hey NANOG! > > My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients > (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients). We are having > problems finding a decent log viewer.

Re: ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Duane Toler" > My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients > (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients). We are having > problems finding a decent log viewer. Several products seem to mean > well, but they all fall short for various

ASA log viewer

2011-11-19 Thread Duane Toler
Hey NANOG! My employer is deploying CIsco ASA firewalls to our clients (specifically the 5505, 5510 for our smaller clients). We are having problems finding a decent log viewer. Several products seem to mean well, but they all fall short for various reasons. We primarily use Check Point firewal

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play

2011-11-19 Thread Joe Greco
> On 11/19/2011 4:04 PM, Joe Greco wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, A. Chase Turner wrote: > >>> I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN > >> hub... > >> > >> Why micro? Just get a pile of free for the carting-off old Pentium > >> machines and run them

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play

2011-11-19 Thread Roy
On 11/19/2011 4:04 PM, Joe Greco wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, A. Chase Turner wrote: I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN hub... Why micro? Just get a pile of free for the carting-off old Pentium machines and run them headless with a BSD. Set th

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play

2011-11-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Jay Ashworth" > I find myself pretty surprised that no one I've seen so far has > suggested *these*: > > http://techreport.com/discussions.x/16466 > > They seem directly on target for what Chase is looking for. Here (apologies) is some retail: http://www.

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play

2011-11-19 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - > From: "Joe Greco" > Subject: Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, A. Chase Turner > > wrote: > > > I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into > > > a LAN hub... > > > > Why micro

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play

2011-11-19 Thread Joe Greco
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, A. Chase Turner wrote: > > I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN > hub... > > Why micro? Just get a pile of free for the carting-off old Pentium > machines and run them headless with a BSD. Set them up to heartbeat to a > cact

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play appliance to report network outages

2011-11-19 Thread Joe Hamelin
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, A. Chase Turner wrote: > I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN hub... Why micro? Just get a pile of free for the carting-off old Pentium machines and run them headless with a BSD. Set them up to heartbeat to a cacti box. Why bu

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play appliance to report network outages

2011-11-19 Thread Jimmy Hess
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 AM, A. Chase Turner wrote: > I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN hub > (behind a consumer-level cable modem) whose only purpose in life is to send > heartbeat (and simple quality of service metrics) to a pre-configured central > a

ab...@brasiltelecom.com.br Contact - Re: http://ipcacoal.org/ipcacoal/includes/kiwi.htm

2011-11-19 Thread Don Gould
Anyone with any clue on how to contact ab...@brasiltelecom.com.br like to forward this? Their abuse contact in the whois database is just bouncing. I do realise this is just day to day noise, but as you can see from the trail below, I have used the normal tools that we put in place to mange

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play appliance to report network outages

2011-11-19 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 11/19/11 01:35 , Fearghas McKay wrote: > > On 17 Nov 2011, at 12:58, A. Chase Turner wrote: > >> I am seeking a $100 turnkey micro hardware appliance to plug into a LAN hub >> (behind a consumer-level cable modem) whose only purpose in life is to send >> heartbeat (and simple quality of serv

Re: Query : seeking a (low cost & secure) turnkey plug-and-play appliance to report network outages

2011-11-19 Thread Barry O'Donovan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/11/11 17:34, Seth Mattinen wrote: > Mikrotik RouterBoards are low cost and robust. It can be scripted > to do things like call a specific URL every X minutes. Some models > have just a single Ethernet port as well (they're designed to be > used