On 16 May 2012, at 00:01, Tom Hill wrote:
I've been itching to try Freeswitch ever since I read this:
http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117
Using FreeSwitch to provide trunk services for nearly a year. Very happy with
it. Just does what it says on the tin.
Currently installing a CudaTel as our
Hello,
sorry for this dumb question.
Is it possible to connect two routers like below ?
RouterA/cstm1 dark fiber cstm1/RouterB
The interfaces used in this case are channelized STM1 in both sides.
Between RouterA and RouterB I would like to create many low-speed
interfaces ranging
Yes, u will have to connect the fibers in a cross manner..and setup one side to
generate the clock..
Faisal
On May 16, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Diogo Montagner diogo.montag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
sorry for this dumb question.
Is it possible to connect two routers like below ?
Hi Faisal,
I have tried the setup in my lab. I can get the cSTM1s UP and the
controllers E1 up. But when I try to configure the subinterface, the
protocol does not come online.
Below is the configuration in one of the sides. The other side has
similar configuration.
controller SONET 4/0/2
On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:
i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.
I've been itching to try Freeswitch
I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the inside out because we ported
both of them to IPv6.
Verdict:
- Asterisk
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simon Perreault
simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca wrote:
On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:
i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.
I've been itching to try Freeswitch
I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk
Hello everyone!
I have a funny case - one of our upstream provider announced our address
space for very short time which was well due to confusion since we
requested them to announce one of other blocks while they by mistake
announced both blocks.
Anyways, now funny thing here is - whenever I
( I coudln't resist )
http://traceroute.sourceforge.net/
#define DEF_RADB_SERVER whois.radb.net
#define DEF_RADB_SERVICEwhois
const char *get_as_path (const char *query) {
server = getenv (RA_SERVER);
if (!server) server = DEF_RADB_SERVER;
service =
Ameen Pishdadi wrote:
A Kia and Ferrari can both get me from point a to point b, but the Ferrari is capable of getting me there way quicker, and yes I'm going to pay a premium for it but if I'm going from NYC to San Fran I'd definitely feel safer in the Ferrari reliability wise and get there a
Users that have a hard time with Asterisk do not understand it.
been running it since pre 1. have large complex configs with confs,
follow-me (my original need), extensions and sip/iax peering with
strange things all over the developing world.
i still think config sucks. and changing syntax
As the global RPKI data set and system load grows, we want to ensure
that the system is performing well. This is why we have added
measurement functionality to the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator toolset:
https://www.ripe.net/certification/rpki-validator-metrics
When enabled, it will gather the
but we're more focused on giving the *user* the tools to measure and
see. so you may want to look at the tables and graphs (graphs more
germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
for example,
http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
oh, and the docco
I liked Cogent when we had them years ago but due to routing instability
(off the charts) and unplanned down time every single month we dropped
them. they call me every 3-6 months (different person each time) and I
tell them to go away
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Tim
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote:
I liked Cogent when we had them years ago but due to routing instability
(off the charts) and unplanned down time every single month we dropped
them. they call me every 3-6 months (different person each time) and I
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
for example,
http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
suggestions for improvement solicited, of course.
the text talks about rpki.net
the link is
Could someone make:
2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too)
no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on rob's
site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for
themselves and their point of view in the universe, not some central
authority.
While there may be other grounds for telling them not to call you, the
do not call list is not one of them as it does not apply to business
to business solicitations.
The national Do-Not-Call list protects home voice or personal
wireless phone numbers only. While you may be able to register a
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
and sorry that our certs did not pay godzilla or gobble for the
privilege of being in their bowsers. refund below [1]
there was no [1]...
startssl.com - free certs. (that work)
18 matches
Mail list logo
