I know how to use Google dear Mark, but I mean which configuration is
working succesfully in their network.
I am currently using this config:
bba-group pppoe TEST
virtual-template 1
sessions per-mac limit 2
sessions per-vlan limit 5000
sessions per-vc throttle 15 30 300
sessions per-mac throt
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Acisco.com+ios+broadband+aggregation+guide
On 9/23/12 1:50 PM, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote:
> why joking Mark?
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
>
>> You are joking I hope
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2012-09-23, at 3:38 PM, "Shahab Vahabzadeh"
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, JÁKÓ András wrote:
>> Second, in the hotspot scenarios where this is likely to be a problem
>> (in IPv4 -or- IPv6) it's addressed by the "AP isolation" feature
>> that's getting close to omnipresent even in the low end APs. With this
>> feature enabled, stations ar
Jo Rhett said:
> One of which I forgot to mention. Many of the hotels (I believe all
> Hilton properties at this time) have sold the facilities space for
> their wifi network to another company.
PSAV is the company. I just installed about 20 Cisco WiFi radios at the
Doubletree (a Hilton prop) at
I think you mean AT&T / wayport. They have ruined a number of hotels that I
stay at. When you talk to support they always claim "unusual" event load due to
the guests involved.
I'm not expecting 50mbps in the room, but not getting past 256k or 512k defeats
the purpose of asking me to offload th
On 9/23/12, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Do FCC regs actually permit that, license-free-band be damned?
[snip]
In the US, operation of 802.11 WiFi devices in the unlicensed bands
is authorized under part 15 of FCC regulations only; LICENSED radio
operators, may be able to operate wireless networkin
- Original Message -
> From: "Jo Rhett"
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > And this is pretty much precisely why I'm hammering the nail;
> > there's
> > *lots* of stuff that could -- and properly should -- be technology
> > assisted at the world's largest gathering of
why joking Mark?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Mark Gauvin wrote:
> You are joking I hope
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2012-09-23, at 3:38 PM, "Shahab Vahabzadeh"
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Paul,
> > Thanks for you reply, May I have those optimization knobs for
> > virtual-template and throttles
You are joking I hope
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-09-23, at 3:38 PM, "Shahab Vahabzadeh" wrote:
> Dear Paul,
> Thanks for you reply, May I have those optimization knobs for
> virtual-template and throttles?
> Maybe looking into your configurations help me in this field.
> I will look for the s
Dear Paul,
Thanks for you reply, May I have those optimization knobs for
virtual-template and throttles?
Maybe looking into your configurations help me in this field.
I will look for the service provider image too.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:17 PM, PC wrote:
> For this application, you m
> Second, in the hotspot scenarios where this is likely to be a problem
> (in IPv4 -or- IPv6) it's addressed by the "AP isolation" feature
> that's getting close to omnipresent even in the low end APs. With this
> feature enabled, stations are not allowed to talk to each other over
> the wlan; they
For this application, you may wish to consider the service provider images.
The latest 15.x(S) image works, as it is the derivative of what was
formerly the service-provider oriented 12.2(SRx) images.
However, it's unlikely to drop steady state CPU, but it may contain some
optimizations for concu
Which software you used before for them?
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Rinse Kloek wrote:
> 6000 PPP users on a NPE-G2 is way too much imho. Currently we do no more
> than 3000 users on a NPE-G2 with PPPoA. (Max cpu 50%).
> 5 years ago, we did about 5000 users on a NPE-G2, but as traffic rati
On Sep 23, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Peter Phaal wrote:
> The difference between packet oriented or flow oriented export is an
> "implementation detail" if your only requirement is to obtain layer IP flow
> records, but becomes significant if you want to create customized flow
> records or create pac
6000 PPP users on a NPE-G2 is way too much imho. Currently we do no more
than 3000 users on a NPE-G2 with PPPoA. (Max cpu 50%).
5 years ago, we did about 5000 users on a NPE-G2, but as traffic ratio's
grow each year the maximum users a NPE-G2 can handle will drop each
year. Don't forget an NPE-G
Hello everybody,
I am using C7206 VXR NPE-G2 routers as BRAS in my network and the current
IOS is *c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T.bin* on them.
Also their memory upgraded to 2GB instead of 1GB.
And I have near 6500 online user on each of my BRAS and there is no
speciefic feature except aaa with
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
>
>> If the *flow generation process is not performed on the router (or otherwise
>> conveyed by some metadata outside of "raw [sampled] packet headers") then
>> you lose visibility to i
On Sep 23, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:
> If the *flow generation process is not performed on the router (or otherwise
> conveyed by some metadata outside of "raw [sampled] packet headers") then you
> lose visibility to ingress and egress ifIndex (interface) information --
> inform
On Sep 23, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Peter Phaal wrote:
> In both cases the router is generating the telemetry, in the netflow
> case, packets are sampled on the router, the router builds flow
> records based on the contents of the sampled packets, and the flow
> records are exported. In the sFlow case,
19 matches
Mail list logo
