I'm hoping to reach out to google's gmail engineers with this message,
Today I noticed that for the past 3 days, email messages from my
personal website's pop3 were not being received into my gmail inbox.
Naturally, I figured that my pop3 service was down, but after some
checking, every thing
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:47:03 -0600
Randy na...@afxr.net wrote:
I'm hoping to reach out to google's gmail engineers with this message,
Today I noticed that for the past 3 days, email messages from my
personal website's pop3 were not being received into my gmail inbox.
Naturally, I figured
On 12/14/2012 10:47 AM, Randy wrote:
I don't have hundreds of dollars to get my ssl certificates signed
You can get single-host certificates issued for free from StartSSL, or
for very cheaply (under $10) from low-cost providers like CheapSSL.com.
I've never had a problem having my StartSSL
http://www.startssl.com/
Their certs are free and, from what I hear, are accepted by Google.
Seconded. I was a hold-out for a long time on personal stuff - I trust me, I'm
not paying someone else to trust me - but StartSSL makes a lot of the pain go
away with minimal effort.
Regards,
Tim.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Peter Kristolaitis alte...@alter3d.ca wrote:
On 12/14/2012 10:47 AM, Randy wrote:
I don't have hundreds of dollars to get my ssl certificates signed
You can get single-host certificates issued for free from StartSSL, or for
very cheaply (under $10) from
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
http://www.startssl.com/
Their certs are free and, from what I hear, are accepted by Google.
Seconded. I was a hold-out for a long time on personal stuff - I trust me,
I'm not paying someone else to trust me - but
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of January.
Jason,
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of the few
critical part of the Internet's infrastructure, at a time when most
networks have entered a
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:46PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of January.
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of the few
critical part of the Internet's
Matthew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:46PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of January.
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of the few
critical part of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:36:08AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Seconded. I was a hold-out for a long time on personal stuff - I trust me,
I'm not paying someone else to trust me - but StartSSL makes a lot of the
pain go away with minimal effort.
because paying for random
Mike,
You will need to update your root.hints file on any of your forwarding DNS
servers. Most OS vendors will include an update but its a good idea to
manually check.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:36:08AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Seconded. I was a hold-out for a long time on personal stuff - I trust
me, I'm not paying someone else to trust me - but StartSSL makes a lot of
the
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:46PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of January.
You've just given 3
If I had to guess, I would guess that renumbering is likely required to get it
into a more portable address assignment from a multi-homing perspective. Look
at the whois information below
If I were hosting a root server or something similar, I would certainly want it
segregated enough that I
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:59:19AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:46PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of the few
critical part
On Dec 14, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
So really stupid question, and hopefully it's just me, do I need to do
something
on my servers?
Update the hints file. /var/named/ somewhere in all likelihood.
Second question: I know that renumbering
Hi Michael,
On 2012-12-14, at 11:59, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Matthew Newton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:46PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of January.
You've just given
On 14/12/2012 16:52, Matthew Newton wrote:
The old address will continue to work for at least six months
after the transition, but will ultimately be retired from
service.
I'm suggesting a lot more notification than 6 months before 128.8.10.90 is
switched off. And corroborative
On 2012-12-14, at 11:42, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of the few
critical part of the Internet's infrastructure, at a time when most
networks have entered a configuration freeze (which will usually finish at
the end of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:45:00PM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
These changes have happened before (other root servers have renumbered). I
have never heard of an operational problem caused by such an exercise, and I
guarantee there are resolvers running happily today with hints files that are
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
It would be really good to have a formal public statement of intent from
UMD about their long term plans for 128.8.10.90 after retirement so that we
don't have a repeat of the L root hijacking debacle in 2008.
Quite so: UMD:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 04:42:46PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Jason,
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of the few
critical part of the Internet's infrastructure, at a time when most
networks have entered a configuration freeze (which will usually finish at
the
So really stupid question, and hopefully it's just me, do I need to do
something
on my servers?
your crontab that updates your root-hints may already have caught the chang=
e...
That seems like a spectacularly bad idea. How do you validate the new
root-hints automatically? What if
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Quite so: UMD: Where will the old IP route after the 6 month period is
complete? Somewhere safe?
In point of fact, ISTM that there *is no way* to make this completely safe;
granted that it's a low percentage attack, and
hand waveydnssec/hand wavey
On Dec 14, 2012 1:06 PM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
So really stupid question, and hopefully it's just me, do I need to do
something
on my servers?
your crontab that updates your root-hints may already have caught the
chang=
e...
That seems
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
On 2012-12-14, at 13:17, Joe Antkowiak antko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Quite so: UMD: Where will the old IP route after the 6 month period is
complete? Somewhere safe?
In point of fact, ISTM that there *is no way* to make
On 12-12-14 12:13, Joe Abley wrote:
In summary, theory (and practice) tells us that:
1. You should update your hints file from time to time, and
2. If you don't, chances are overwhelmingly good that it will make no
difference, and everything will work as normal.
But this is important to
- Original Message -
From: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca
Quite so: UMD: Where will the old IP route after the 6 month period
is complete? Somewhere safe?
As I understand it (but ask UMD!)
- D-Root is currently numbered out of a general-purpose UMD /16 into a
dedicated,
- Original Message -
From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
So, in short, UMD will still own the losing allocation, and be able
to make
relatively sure nothing else is placed at that IP (though of course
they
won't necessarily be able to make sure no one hijacks that entire
not at all... the WCIT 2012 concluded without agreement. Hardly the same
thing.
/bill
? Again? ;)
From my Galaxy Note II, please excuse any mistakes.
Original message
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Date: 12/14/2012 11:44 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: North American Network Operators' Group nanog@nanog.org
Subject: btw, the itu imploded
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:41:48AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
---end quoted text---
Yep. _Gloriously_! The US walked out, followed by bunchty others.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2020469/opponents-say-itu-treaty-threatens-internet-freedom.html
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/12 11:42, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 13/12/2012 22:54, Jason Castonguay wrote:
Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of
January.
Jason,
You've just given 3 weeks notice for a component change in one of
the few
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:46:49PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
So, in short, UMD will still own the losing allocation, and be able
to make
relatively sure nothing else is placed at that IP (though of course
they
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
Yep. _Gloriously_! The US walked out, followed by bunchty others.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2020469/opponents-say-itu-treaty-threatens-internet-freedom.html
At current count, to the best of my incomplete knowledge,
On 12-12-14 15:13, Jason Castonguay wrote:
I've given 3 weeks + 6 months (at least) notice on a service change that
will not be noticed by most anyone.
Upon hearing your announcement, I went and dig myself a new root.hints
file from one of the root servers. the D root is still pointing to
See also: http://www.ipv.sx/wcit/
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Hi Jean,
On Dec 14, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca
wrote:
On 12-12-14 15:13, Jason Castonguay wrote:
I've given 3 weeks + 6 months (at least) notice on a service change that
will not be noticed by most anyone.
Upon hearing your announcement, I went
On 14/12/2012 19:51, Mike A wrote:
Yep. _Gloriously_! The US walked out, followed by bunchty others.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2020469/opponents-say-itu-treaty-threatens-internet-freedom.html
The ITU didn't implode and that article gives a ridiculously misleading
impression of what
On 12/14/2012 03:12 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
On 12-12-14 15:13, Jason Castonguay wrote:
I've given 3 weeks + 6 months (at least) notice on a service change that
will not be noticed by most anyone.
Upon hearing your announcement, I went and dig myself a new root.hints
file from one of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jason Castonguay casto...@umd.edu wrote:
The old address, which is in the middle of UMD's network, is going to be
black-holed once the change is over. Nothing will be on that IP once we
move the root off. The rest of UMD's network is staying put. This move
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:10:44PM -0600, Joe Antkowiak wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jason Castonguay casto...@umd.edu wrote:
The old address, which is in the middle of UMD's network, is going to be
black-holed once the change is over. Nothing will be on that IP once we
move
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
because you would not accept a /30 cutout of the UMD /16 coming
from some random IX in Singapore. (see Joe Ableys post earlier
today
on why legacy nodes are / have renumbered.)
/bill
Agreed on
WCIT-12 was but one exchange.
The next one is WTPF-13:
The World Telecommunication/Information and Communication Technology Policy
Forum (WTPF) is a high-level international event to exchange views on the key
policy issues arising from today's fast changing information and communication
A major problem with free or low-cost certificates is that their intermediate
CA certificate does not always point back to a root certificate in client
machines and/or software.
matthew black
california state university, long beach
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kristolaitis
This report has been generated at Fri Dec 14 21:13:09 2012 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 06-Dec-12 -to- 13-Dec-12 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS982953057 2.1% 38.9 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet
Backbone
2 - AS8402
I've heard this argument fairly often when I mention free/cheap
certificates to colleagues, etc, but no one has ever actually pointed to
a reasonable case where this is true (the 20 year old VMS system that
I've never patched running OpenSSL 0.0.0.0.1-pre-alpha doesn't work
doesn't count...).
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Peter Kristolaitis alte...@alter3d.ca wrote:
In my experience, free/cheap certs not working on some clients is, in
99.9% of cases, a misconfiguration error where the server isn't presenting
the cert chain properly (usually omitting the intermediate cert), which
On 12/14/2012 11:11 PM, eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
It's been about 2 years in since I've heard about the concept, and honestly
I'm about ready to jump into test environments at my house. My questions
are pretty basic, what distro would you recommend for a controller, and
should I start by
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
Other root servers have renumbered out of institutional, general-purpose
networks into dedicated networks in the past. I think the last one was B-Root
in 2004,
Actually, it was L in 2007... :)
Regards,
-drc
On Dec 14, 2012 8:47 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Yeah, it's the neatest thing since sliced bread, but requires layer-2
connectivity across the board. When you exhaust your mac address
tables, we'll welcome you back to the real world.
I think you are confusing vendor solutions with
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:48:07PM -0800, David Conrad wrote:
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
Other root servers have renumbered out of institutional, general-purpose
networks into dedicated networks in the past. I think the last one was
B-Root in 2004,
55 matches
Mail list logo