Re: semi-ot: network monitoring tools
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Ryan Dooley wrote: Coworkers of mine introduced me to Observium: http://www.observium.org/wiki/Main_Page Does it utilize flow telemetry? On the main page, they talk about SNMP, making it sound a lot like Nagios . . . --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Re: semi-ot: network monitoring tools
No all stats are snmp based On 02 окт. 2013 г., at 9:07, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Ryan Dooley wrote: Coworkers of mine introduced me to Observium: http://www.observium.org/wiki/Main_Page Does it utilize flow telemetry? On the main page, they talk about SNMP, making it sound a lot like Nagios . . . --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Re: semi-ot: network monitoring tools
Have them check out the various services from Team Cymru: https://www.team-cymru.org/Services/ Specifically the TC Console Cheers, Harry On 10/02/2013 02:34 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote: No all stats are snmp based On 02 окт. 2013 г., at 9:07, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Ryan Dooley wrote: Coworkers of mine introduced me to Observium: http://www.observium.org/wiki/Main_Page Does it utilize flow telemetry? On the main page, they talk about SNMP, making it sound a lot like Nagios . . . --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
Carlos == Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo carlosm3...@gmail.com writes: Carlos Hi all, Carlos We'd appreciate having someone from PCCW, particularly from their operation Carlos in Panama, having contact us. Private is fine. Carlos A downstream customer from them in Panama has been observed hijacking some Carlos prefixes. Carlos regards Please report to our noc (usnoc at pccwglobal.com) with details. Pf
Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
Hi all, We'd appreciate having someone from PCCW, particularly from their operation in Panama, having contact us. Private is fine. A downstream customer from them in Panama has been observed hijacking some prefixes. regards ~Carlos -- -- = Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo h http://cagnazzo.namettp://cagnazzo.me =
Final Agenda Published - NANOG 59
All, The final agenda for our meeting next week has been published at http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog59/agenda Please note that the program begins at 10AM on Monday and the tutorials can now be found on Tuesday morning. I hope you all share the excitement that I do for this great program. For newcomers, we'll host a welcome lunch on Monday at noon. Even if you're an old timer, we'd love to have you at this lunch to help introduce this potentially record-breaking crowd (we sit at 594 registered attendees at this moment) to NANOG and help them get the most of their time at the meeting. We'll provide you with more information on-site, and as always, feel free to seek out a member of any of the committees - Program, Development, Communications, and of course, the Board of Directors, if you have any questions. I promise we're a friendly bunch! Best Regards, -Dave Temkin Chair, NANOG Program Committee
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo carlosm3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We'd appreciate having someone from PCCW, particularly from their operation in Panama, having contact us. Private is fine. A downstream customer from them in Panama has been observed hijacking some prefixes. regards ~Carlos -- -- = Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo h http://cagnazzo.namettp://cagnazzo.me =
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
Le 02/10/2013 19:43, Christopher Morrow a écrit : I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. Ohhh, they're rare bird? ( I'd hope so, rare bird; and I do strongly agree that (at least) these birds -- customer-routes -- should live in a transparent community... IRR (well...), (or for those who believe) RPKI :-) ) Thoughts? Cheers, mh On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo carlosm3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We'd appreciate having someone from PCCW, particularly from their operation in Panama, having contact us. Private is fine. A downstream customer from them in Panama has been observed hijacking some prefixes. regards ~Carlos -- -- = Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo h http://cagnazzo.namettp://cagnazzo.me =
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. never happened before, right?
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. never happened before, right? wait... let me think... nope, never.
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. never happened before, right? wait... let me think... nope, never. if they do it again, someone should make a youtube of it randy
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. never happened before, right? wait... let me think... nope, never. if they do it again, someone should make a youtube of it untold dozens of views I suspect that would get!
Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ?
Add their hold music as the background track. I'm surprised you guys are surprised. ;) Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com Date: 10/03/2013 7:49 AM (GMT+08:00) To: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org,Carlos Martinez car...@lacnic.net Subject: Re: Someone from PCCW NOC here ? On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: I am shocked that a pccw customer isn't being prefix-filtered. never happened before, right? wait... let me think... nope, never. if they do it again, someone should make a youtube of it untold dozens of views I suspect that would get!
Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?
On 31/08/2013 13:09, Randy Bush wrote: i wonder if this is correlated with the high number of probes being behind nats. Maybe this provides a bit of insight: From a test last week from all RIPE Atlas probes to a single known good MTU 1500 host I compared probes where I had both a ping test with ipv4.len 1020 and ipv4.len 1502. behind NAT probes: 12% 1020 bytes ping worked while 1502 failed non-NATted probes: 6% this needs publication on your adventure game of a web site, please. it will seriously 'inform' some discussion going back and forth on ietf lists. This is now published on RIPE Labs. For the adventurous: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/ripe-atlas-packet-size-matters regards, Emile Aben RIPE NCC
Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?
this needs publication on your adventure game of a web site, please. it will seriously 'inform' some discussion going back and forth on ietf lists. This is now published on RIPE Labs. For the adventurous: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/ripe-atlas-packet-size-matters some hours back, i posted the url to the ietf list arguing frag thanks a million randy
