+2 for Brocade MLXe we use them globally now for almost 3 years and are very
happy with them !!
Brocade Rocks !! period !!
Kindest Regards
James Braunegg
P: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616
E: james.braun...@micron21.com | ABN: 12 109 977 666
W:
Same here using MX routers and Brocade
+1 for MX due to the unix shell =)
Med vänlig hälsning
Andreas Larsen
IP-Only Telecommunication AB| Postadress: 753 81 UPPSALA | Besöksadress: S:t
Persgatan 6, Uppsala |
Telefon: +46 (0)18 843 10 00 | Direkt: +46 (0)18 843 10 56
www.ip-only.se
On 12/9/13, 12:34 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:51:46 -0500, Cutler James R said:
According to Comcast's DOCSIS Devices page,
http://mydeviceinfo.comcast.net/?s=3Diso=1e=0d3=1tier=-1sc=84
the Cisco DPC3008 is not supported for IPv6. You
Wotcha,
Number 1 gets you thinking along the IPv6 route (no pun, and imho :) )
since you have to treat each boxes as if it was public.
I see this kind of statement surprisingly often. Having a public address
doesn't make a device public.
I don't really see a drive to have devices exposed to the
Brocade MLXe with the XMR cards is a good choice, yes, but -1 for
What do you mean that this feature isn't fully implemented yet?? It's
been in common use among other vendors for better than 10 years!
They're a lot better than they were but still a bit lagging.
-Wayne
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at
On 11/12/13 10:13 am, Alex White-Robinson ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Wotcha,
Number 1 gets you thinking along the IPv6 route (no pun, and imho :) )
since you have to treat each boxes as if it was public.
I see this kind of statement surprisingly often. Having a public address
doesn't make a
Cogent found the problem today. It took them 4 days to do a ‘show conf’ and
see that an outbound access-list was applied to my interface by mistake during
a ‘normal maintenance window at 8AM EST on Friday’
4 days of jumping through hoops to prove that the problem wasn’t on my network.
I am wondering if anyone has experience hosting services in South Korea,
who did you choose for colocation services and in what city?
thanks,
shahid
On 12/10/2013 4:30 PM, Geraint Jones wrote:
Number 1 gets you thinking along the IPv6 route (no pun, and imho :) )
since you have to treat each boxes as if it was public.
I see this kind of statement surprisingly often. Having a public address
doesn't make a device public.
Yes it does,
On 11/12/13 1:47 pm, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
On 12/10/2013 4:30 PM, Geraint Jones wrote:
Number 1 gets you thinking along the IPv6 route (no pun, and imho :) )
since you have to treat each boxes as if it was public.
I see this kind of statement surprisingly often. Having
On Dec 10, 2013 2:32 PM, Geraint Jones gera...@koding.com wrote:
On 11/12/13 10:13 am, Alex White-Robinson ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Wotcha,
Number 1 gets you thinking along the IPv6 route (no pun, and imho :) )
since you have to treat each boxes as if it was public.
I see this kind of
On Dec 10, 2013, at 8:27 PM, cb.list6 cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct. IPv6 correctly supports the end to end model.
Yes, if you know the IP address of my printer you can use up my toner (it’s
already low) and paper. Then again, It’s IPv6 so good luck finding it. The
first nibble is 2.
Hi,
We are currently having routing issues between one of our customers and
www.army.mil which is originated from AS1503.
Does anyone have a contact for AS1503? We've tried the ARIN contacts for
AS1503 but have not received any response.
Thanks,
Chris
Fibrenoire AS22652
If memory serves me correctly army.mil is run by DISA. May get more traction
with them.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Christopher Morrell christopher.morrell.na...@gmail.com
Date: 12/10/2013 4:38 PM (GMT-09:00)
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Contact for
Your best bet is to have your customer find whoever in the army he needs to
get in touch with, or does business with, and have them raise this through
internal army IT channels
--srs (htc one x)
On 11-Dec-2013 7:23 AM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
If memory
Original message
From: Christopher Morrell christopher.morrell.na...@gmail.com
We are currently having routing issues between one of our customers and
www.army.milhttp://www.army.mil which is originated from AS1503.
Does anyone have a contact for AS1503? We've tried the ARIN
I fully said to call DISA, not CALL THE GUB! ;)
DISN GLOBAL SUPPORT CENTER
DSN: (510) 376-3222 or (312) 850-4790
CML: (800) 554-3476 or (614) 692-4790
disa.d...@mail.mil
d...@cols.csd.disa.smil.mil
You probably aren¹t on the DSN, and I don¹t think they accept incoming
calls from the PSTN.
Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with full
QoS other features?
Suresh is spot on. I can forward your message to a couple of my internal
Army POC's as well who may or may not be able to help, my best POC left
sadly.
It's a long shot, but the AKO help desk may be able to route you to the
right group of folks too. Their number is 1-866-335-2769 (A.R.M.Y.).
On 12/10/2013 8:21 AM, Nilesh Kahar wrote:
Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with full QoS
other features?
Victoria's Secret has some nice ones.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
Greetings,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 10, 2013, at 8:27 PM, cb.list6 cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct. IPv6 correctly supports the end to end model.
Yes, if you know the IP address of my printer you can use up my toner
(it’s already low) and paper. Then again, It’s
Sir whatever that is an acronym for, you have my undivided.
This is going to make for an interesting thread in about 6 hours.
What's so interesting about a guy asking for info on a Broadband Remote Access
Server for DSL aggregation?
On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Nick Cameo sym...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir whatever that is an acronym for, you have my undivided.
This is going to make for an interesting thread in about 6
On 11.12.2013 17:11, Nick Cameo wrote:
Sir whatever that is an acronym for, you have my undivided.
This is going to make for an interesting thread in about 6 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Remote_Access_Server
On 12/11/2013 12:16 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
On 11.12.2013 17:11, Nick Cameo wrote:
Sir whatever that is an acronym for, you have my undivided.
This is going to make for an interesting thread in about 6 hours.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Remote_Access_Server
May not be
25 matches
Mail list logo
