On Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:28:47 AM Vlade Ristevski
wrote:
My Cisco SE brought up an interesting alternative. This
summer we're replacing our 6513 Sup720 with a pair of
6807 with redundant Sup 2Ts. It is where all our
internal Fiber terminates and where internal routing
happens. He
On 2014-02-12 05:47, Frank Bulk wrote:
In the scenario you're describing does each PC get its own /64 (or /56 or
/48) directly from the service provider? Or are they in the same netblock?
They are connected through a L2 switch directly to the access port.
Mikael responded in another email,
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 05:08:02 AM Mikael
Abrahamsson wrote:
A lot of people use SUP720-3BXL and RSP720-3CXL for full
BGP table routing. This will work just fine until the
IPv4 routing table reaches 800k entries or something (if
you want to do IPv6 at the same time, you probably
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:37:54 AM Anders Löwinger
wrote:
They are connected through a L2 switch directly to the
access port.
Mikael responded in another email, and verified that
traffic will be exchanged trough the default gateway
even if the PCs are in the same home.
If CPE
Good write up, includes name and shame for ATT Wireless, IIJ, OVH,
DTAG and others
http://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-details-behind-a-400gbps-ntp-amplification-ddos-attack
Standard plug for http://openntpproject.org/ and
http://openresolverproject.org/ and bcp38 , please fix/help.
For those
On Feb 13, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Cb B cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Good write up, includes name and shame for ATT Wireless, IIJ, OVH,
DTAG and others
http://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-details-behind-a-400gbps-ntp-amplification-ddos-attack
Standard plug for http://openntpproject.org/ and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2/13/2014 9:06 AM, Cb B wrote:
Good write up, includes name and shame for ATT Wireless, IIJ,
OVH, DTAG and others
http://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-details-behind-a-400gbps-ntp-amplification-ddos-attack
Standard plug for
Dan Brisson wrote the following on 2/12/2014 9:06 PM:
My Cisco SE brought up an interesting alternative. This summer we're
replacing our 6513 Sup720 with a pair of 6807 with redundant Sup 2Ts.
It is where all our internal Fiber terminates and where internal
routing happens. He said we can
Looking for real-world experience with Tail-f NCS (or similar network
configuration management.)
Not looking for rancid, we have a homebrew config collection that works
well. Looking for something significantly better than I can write myself.
Not looking for sales either, I have people for that
The authors of the Wide BGP Communities Internet-draft would like to solicit
your feedback on the current version of the draft. The intended purpose of
the feature is to provide for next-generation BGP communities.
Why next-generation? A few motivations:
- BGP Path Attribute code space is
So the Routing Database is something that I am just learning about and trying
to find out if I need to create a Route-set or not. I just created my MNTNER
ID and I also created the Route Objects for my two /24s that were given to my
by my carriers. Do I need a route-set or aut-num object
On 02/13/2014 10:06 AM, Cb B wrote:
Good write up, includes name and shame for ATT Wireless, IIJ, OVH,
DTAG and others
http://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-details-behind-a-400gbps-ntp-amplification-ddos-attack
Standard plug for http://openntpproject.org/ and
http://openresolverproject.org/
Does anyone know what is the equivalent or similar conference / organization for
Internet operators in Asia Pacific?
Thanks,
Krishnan
I am a newbie at it as well, having said that.. the short answer to your
question is YES to aut-num and NO to route-set ..
but the longer answer will always be based on how you are using the IRR
If you are doing this for the most common, basic reason, that one of your
upstream is
There is a group called PTC.. Pacific Telecommunications Council.. That¹s
pretty much the biggest I can think of (lot¹s of MSO¹s.. Operators, etc.)
and it¹s in Hawaii every year.
On 2/13/14, 11:25 AM, Krishnan Subramanian
krishnan.subraman...@guavus.com wrote:
Does anyone know what is the
Apricot
Mehmet
On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:25, Krishnan Subramanian
krishnan.subraman...@guavus.com wrote:
Does anyone know what is the equivalent or similar conference / organization
for
Internet operators in Asia Pacific?
Thanks,
Krishnan
http://2014.apricot.net/
-R
On 14/02/14 5:25 AM, Krishnan Subramanian
krishnan.subraman...@guavus.com wrote:
Does anyone know what is the equivalent or similar conference /
organization for
Internet operators in Asia Pacific?
Thanks,
Krishnan
http://www.nznog.org/home
http://www.ausnog.net/
http://www.sanog.org/
https://www.pacnog.org/
--
Geraint Jones
Director of Systems Infrastructure
Koding
https://koding.com
gera...@koding.com
Phone (415) 653-0083
On 14/02/14 8:25 am, Krishnan Subramanian
APRICOT conference always has time slots of Peering Forum and
Peering Cocktail for peering topic.
JANOG meeting is held in Japan twice a year.
http://www.janog.gr.jp/en/
Regards,
Masataka MAWATARI
* On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:40:15 +
* Nurul Islam Roman nu...@apnic.net wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:47 PM, John jsch...@flowtools.net wrote:
On 02/13/2014 10:06 AM, Cb B wrote:
Good write up, includes name and shame for ATT Wireless, IIJ, OVH,
DTAG and others
http://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-details-behind-a-400gbps-ntp-amplification-ddos-attack
Standard plug
There is a group called PTC
the T stands for telco. no internet peering
The origin stands alone; no aut-num needed in many cases.
The way many providers use the IRR info is to take the adjacent ASN and do
a reverse index lookup on the origin field.
That is, for AS1234, what are all the route and route6 objects with that as
an origin.
If you need something more
Simmer.
http://www.iixpeering.net/news/iix-leads-remote-peering-industry-at-ptc-14/
...
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Date: 02/13/2014 5:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com
Cc:
https://www.ams-ix.net/events/19
In case more citation is required. I'd imagine the whole free trip to hawaii
aspect brings in more folks than you'd expect.
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Date: 02/13/2014 5:34 PM
http://www.iixpeering.net/news/iix-leads-remote-peering-industry-at-ptc-14/
ah yes, sales and marketing bumph. desperate for any venue.
the point is, if you want to do internet peering in asia, the venues are
apricot, sanog, aus/nz/.../nog, ripe (yes, asian peering coords go to
ripe), etc.
The way many providers use the IRR info is to take the adjacent ASN and do
a reverse index lookup on the origin field.
That is, for AS1234, what are all the route and route6 objects with that as
an origin.
If you need something more complicated, you can use an aut-num object to
say that an
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Warren Bailey wrote:
There is a group called PTC.. Pacific Telecommunications Council.. That¹s
pretty much the biggest I can think of (lot¹s of MSO¹s.. Operators, etc.)
and it¹s in Hawaii every year.
Actually the conference moves around the Pacific.
Antonio Querubin
On Friday, February 14, 2014 01:35:03 AM Warren Bailey
wrote:
There is a group called PTC.. Pacific Telecommunications
Council.. That¹s pretty much the biggest I can think of
(lot¹s of MSO¹s.. Operators, etc.) and it¹s in Hawaii
every year.
PTC is not your typical -NOG or -PF forum.
It's
the survey questions are highly biased toward arin's view of itself.
just one example. you ask how well arin serves it's members and
customers. you do not ask how well it serves the internet community,
the internet, or society in general. and that particular bias in
viewpoint is at the core of
I answered it truthfully, I clicked a lot of 1s.
On Feb 13, 2014 10:21 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
the survey questions are highly biased toward arin's view of itself.
just one example. you ask how well arin serves it's members and
customers. you do not ask how well it serves the
I answered it truthfully, I clicked a lot of 1s.
i actually find day-to-day transactions with hostfolk ok. the org just
has no vision of the internet. register, do not regulate. board, ceo,
and AC seem to be dominated by itu wannabes.
randy
On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I answered it truthfully, I clicked a lot of 1s.
i actually find day-to-day transactions with hostfolk ok. the org just
has no vision of the internet. register, do not regulate. board, ceo,
and AC seem to be dominated by itu
32 matches
Mail list logo
