On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Julien Goodwin wrote:
But you'd never send it all the waves anyway, that's far too much loss
across the band.
Please elaborate.
ROADMs already solve this problem, and are available at the module level
(how practically available and usable I've no idea, never needed to
On 26/04/14 16:02, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Julien Goodwin wrote:
But you'd never send it all the waves anyway, that's far too much loss
across the band.
Please elaborate.
At 3dB loss per split you'd very quickly need additional amplification,
at which point the
Greetings,
NANOG Mail Server Maintenance is now complete.
Regards,
Larry Blunk
NANOG Communications Committee
Will need amplification anyway for almost any realistic topology.
For those who don't understand what or why, please read the Terastream PDF
and watch the video several times, then tell me it's not a great idea :-)
On Saturday, April 26, 2014, Julien Goodwin na...@studio442.com.au wrote:
On
I'm a big fan of the Terastream setup and have done a lot of research into
it, it makes sense if the density and bandwidth needs are fairly low and
the distances not so great. Terastream also makes use of a LOT of raw
fiber which most do not really have access to. Right now only one router
At 22:00 25/04/2014 +, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote:
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 25 21:13:54 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a
Op 26 apr. 2014, om 20:05 heeft Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il het
volgende geschreven:
At 22:00 25/04/2014 +, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote:
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 25 21:13:54 2014 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a
Historic event - 500K prefixes on the Internet.
And now we wait for everything to fall over at 512k ;)
Based on a quick plot graph on the CIDR report, it looks like we are adding
6,000 prefixes a month, or thereabouts. So platforms that break at 512K die in
two months or less? Sup720s
On Apr 24, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
On 4/24/2014 10:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The invisible hand of the market cannot fix problems when there is a
monopoly.
Put in economic terms, a player with Market Power is extracting Rents.
(Capitalization
On Apr 24, 2014, at 9:57 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
I just posted a completely empty message for which I apologize.
Larry is confused. He can claim he is not, but posting to NANOG does
not change the facts. Then again, just because I posted to NANOG
doesn't prove I'm
On 23/04/2014 17:47, Henning Brauer wrote:
fortunately this obviously isn't a big problem in practice, based on
the fact that we don't get any complaints/reports in that direction.
still would be way micer if that situation had been created in the
first place, but as said - we weren't given
On 4/26/2014 3:01 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Apr 24, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
wrote:
Monopolies can not persist without regulation.
This is absolutely false. Regulating monopolies CAN protect
monopolies, but that’s not always the outcome.
Monopolies absolutely
On 4/26/2014 3:11 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
In my neighborhood, Comcast has a monopoly on coax cable tv and HFC
internet services. There are no regulations that support that
monopoly. Another company could, theoretically, apply, receive
permits,
Wait! What?
Like if I want to build a pipeline
h/t Suresh Ramasubramanian
FCC throws in the towel on net neutrality
http://www.zdnet.com/fcc-throws-in-the-towel-on-net-neutrality-728770/
Forward! On to the next windmill, Sancho!
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
I am trying to organize the DNS Track and as usual we would like to
make this very attractive.
mehmet, i know you're an engineer. screw attractive. how about
technically informative and meaty?
randy
Randy,
To an engineer, that _IS_ attractive.
Jim
On Apr 26, 2014, at 9:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I am trying to organize the DNS Track and as usual we would like to
make this very attractive.
mehmet, i know you're an engineer. screw attractive. how about
DNS is Sexy, y'all know it.
Mehmet
On Apr 26, 2014, at 18:56, James R Cutler james.cut...@consultant.com wrote:
Randy,
To an engineer, that _IS_ attractive.
Jim
On Apr 26, 2014, at 9:47 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I am trying to organize the DNS Track and as usual we
jim,
To an engineer, that _IS_ attractive.
i am an occasional engineer. i find the recent gl1tz!ficat!on of nanog,
the mass of committees and important positions, ... disgusting.
randy
jim,
To an engineer, that _IS_ attractive.
i am an occasional engineer. i find the recent gl1tz!ficat!on of nanog,
the mass of committees and important positions, ... embarrassing.
randy
DNS is Sexy, y'all know it.
no wonder dns geeks seem to have a low birth rate
On 4/26/2014 8:56 PM, James R Cutler wrote:
To an engineer, that _IS_ attractive.
Amen. Also to engineer wannabees.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
On 4/26/14, 7:00 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
i am an occasional engineer. i find the recent gl1tz!ficat!on of nanog,
the mass of committees and important positions, ... disgusting.
Some people would call that community participation. Perhaps a side
effect of the split from merit and nanog's
Okay, I'm not as seasoned as a big chunk of this list, but please correct me if
I'm wrong in finding this article a crock of crap. With Comcast/Netflix being
in the mix and by association Cogent in the background of that there's
obviously room for some heated opinions, but here goes anyway...
23 matches
Mail list logo
