AusNOG 2014 Call for Presentations

Call for presentations for AusNOG 2014 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Swissotel Sydney 4 & 5 September 2014 Topics =-=-=- Internet operations can be a broad topic and the programme committee will be short-listing presentations in the following focus areas: * Improving the redunda

bgp convergence problem

Hi everyone, I have one bgp convergence problem which confused me. The problem is as follows: ++ | AS5 | +--+16.1/16 | | +-+--+ || +---+--+ | | AS4 | | | |

Re: Residential CPE suggestions

I've used both the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco RV042G. The EdgeRouter runs a modified version of Vyatta that's incredibly versatile. The RV042G is your standard Cisco SOHO Dual-WAN router - it has telnet, but is limited, and otherwise is solid. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Deepak Jain w

Reviewers needed: How Internet Peering Improves Security

Hi fellow NANOGers - I recently spent some time with peering coordinators at industry events (NANOG, EPF, AFPIF, UKNOF, etc.) where I asked “How does Internet Peering affect Internet Security?” The result of this exercise is a white paper, currently in its draft 4-page form, entitled “How Inte

Re: linkedin.com abuse admins around?

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:50 PM, wrote: > If there is anyone from linkedin.com abuse around please let me know. > I've been trying for 2 months to get an abuse issue resolved. > That's not abuse, that's a feature. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474

Re: Residential CPE suggestions

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 12:13:34AM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Deepak Jain wrote: > > > > Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks > > (WAN) with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution? > > Ideally, LAN port

linkedin.com abuse admins around?

If there is anyone from linkedin.com abuse around please let me know. I've been trying for 2 months to get an abuse issue resolved. -Dan

Re: Residential CPE suggestions

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Deepak Jain wrote: > > Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks (WAN) > with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution? Ideally, LAN > port should be 100/1000 CAT5. I've looking at Mikrotik, Draytek and others. >

Residential CPE suggestions

Any recommendation for a residential CPE that supports dual SFP uplinks (WAN) with either a routing protocol or a resilient Ethernet solution? Ideally, LAN port should be 100/1000 CAT5. I've looking at Mikrotik, Draytek and others. Looking something in a lower three-digit price point. Otherwis

Re: Paging HP DNS admin

In message <5367fdce.6090...@hpl.hp.com>, Andris Kalnozols writes: > On 5/3/2014 9:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > >> Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: > ... > >> Oddly, it seems to be specific to ; any other type request I

Re: Paging HP DNS admin

On 5/3/2014 9:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: ... Oddly, it seems to be specific to ; any other type request I send comes back NOERROR correctly. It is like somebody tried to handle "spe

Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

Randy Bush writes: >> Ah, so you're in the camp that a /10 given to one organization for >> their private use would have been better than reserving that /10 for >> _everyone_ to use. We'll have to agree to disagree there. > > you forced an rfc allocation. that makes public space, and is and wil

Observations of an Internet Middleman

http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/ -- staticsafe https://asininetech.com

[NANOG-announce] NANOG Event Updates

NANOGers: A few reminders regarding upcoming NANOG Events: - NANOG ON THE Road - LA is fast approaching, Tuesday, May 20, 2014. If you have not yet registered for this free one day event, consider doing so now

RE: CLEC and FTTP H.248/Megaco

It would probably be simplest to allow the operator to run the physical network and provide the CLEC's access to service provisioning on that network. Thanks, Joe McLeod MUS FiberNET www.musfiber.com 919 Jarnigan Avenue, Morristown TN 37815 O: 423-317-6276 jmcl...@musfiber.net -Origin

Re: CLEC and FTTP H.248/Megaco

We currently use MGCP on our ONTs. The configuration file is downloaded at boot, and contains the IP address of the our switch. In theory, the IP address could be set in the configuration file to point to a different service provider on a per ONT basis. Unbundling of FTTH access is still

Re: What Net Neutrality should and should not cover

On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 8:25 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: >> On 4/27/2014 3:30 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> In a non-stupid world, the cable companies would do video on demand >>> through some combination of content caches at the head end or, for

Re: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

On Monday, May 05, 2014 09:27:37 AM Vitkovský Adam wrote: > You mean the SR right? No, I mean: draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-05 The draft looks at issues that need to be fixed for MPLS to run in a single-stack IPv6 network. Of course, there is other work that is looking at fixing L

RE: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

> > Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure > > could be built without v4 space, demoting > > v4 to a legacy application inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg > > seems content with status quo. > > There is work ongoing in the MPLS IETF WG on identifying the gaps th