Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts
can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could
then propagate the binding to other switches in the Layer 2 domain)?
Further discovery requests (e.g. ARP, ND) from other attached hosts could
then
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sam Stickland s...@spacething.org wrote:
Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts
can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could
then propagate the binding to other switches in the Layer 2 domain)?
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Tarko Tikan ta...@lanparty.ee wrote:
2000::/64 has nothing to do with it.
Any address between 2000::::::: and
23ff::::::: together with misconfigured prefix
length (6 instead 64) becomes 2000::/6 prefix.
On 14/09/2014 22:19, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Any decent router won't allow you to enter just anything in that range
into the export rules with a /6, except 2000:: itself
tarko is right in suggesting that config typos can cause this sort of
thing, e.g.
--
router bgp 6
address-family ipv6
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 04:19:42PM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Tarko Tikan ta...@lanparty.ee wrote:
2000::/64 has nothing to do with it.
Any address between 2000::::::: and
23ff::::::: together with
5 matches
Mail list logo
