paging AT&T peeps
Does anyone have AT&T's AVPN BGP communities reference guide?
e.g. 13979:120 to set local_pref to 120 and so on.
Thanks in advance!
--Andrey
Can someone from Charter Communications engineering/support hit me up off
list please? Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Max
On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Tim Raphael wrote:
> From my research, various authorities have recommended that a single /64 be
> allocated to router loopbacks with /128s assigned on interfaces.
Yes, this is what I advocate for loopbacks.
From my research, various authorities have recommended that a single /64 be
allocated to router loopbacks with /128s assigned on interfaces. This makes a
lot of sense to me as (which has been said) there is no other *need* in the
foreseeable future to have more than one IP on the loopback - this
Hi Anurag
Here is sample output from using the mtr command: the -z flag shows AS
Numbers however, I am not sure where they come from or are looked up.
mtr can be downloaded :
https://code.google.com/p/rudix/downloads/detail?name=mtr-0.82-0.pkg
mtr -4z google.com
x61 (0.0.0.0)
On 10/11/2014 8:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> For Router Loopback Address what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?
The number of IPs addresses used on them subnets on them loopbacks is as
far as I can foresee only one [for each loopback]. So a subnet of size "one
address" should do it.
An
On 10/10/14, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Baldur Norddahl
>
>> Why do people assign addresses to point-to-point links at all? You can just
>> use a host /128 route to the loopback address of the peer. Saves you the
>> hassle of coming up with new addresses for every link.
Some people think the benefi
7 matches
Mail list logo
