Re: inexpensive KVMoIP
I too like the Spider regardless of it's Java issues. It does accept SSH to Serial Console so there is a non-Java way to use it. If I can, serial console redirection is preferred but all of my Supermicro systems have the IPMI onboard. Expect to see more solutions use tools like http://guac-dev.org/ in the very near future. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net wrote: On 2014-10-23, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net sent: Having recently encountered a problem with a machine, I’m looking for an inexpensive KVMoIP device to place within a facility to take VGA/USB Keyboard for a single host scale. Ideally something that can be properly placed on the internet, but that’s not a showstopper. If you’re willing to loan me one for a week or two as well, let me know too so I can ship it to the site and recover my machine. I've used Lantronix Spiders in the past, they're not bad. I'm curious if anyone knows of one that doesn't use Java for the client though. With things like NoVNC and Guacamole out there now, it seems like a HTML5 based remote KVM should be possible and not a nightmare to work with. -- Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net http://2bithacker.net/ -- ~ Andrew lathama Latham lath...@lathama.com http://lathama.net ~
Department of Education contact (BOGON listing)?
Anyone have a good contact? I emailed the whois for the IP network but haven't heard back yet. Didn't find any contact info in whois for ed.gov. :( ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov. ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduftcdnsp02.ed.gov. ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduptcdnsp01.ed.gov. ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduptcdnsp02.ed.gov. dig: couldn't get address for 'eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov' Unable to reach their nameservers from 104/8 networks. Other networks are fine. Jack Bates Paradox Networks
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
- Original Message - From: Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net Hmm, now this one I wasn't aware of this tidbit here has made this thread worthwhile to me, as we work on developing some clustered 'things' for use here. CoreOS wasn't even on the 'look at this at some point in time' list before, but it is now. Thanks, Jay. Funny, and here my reaction is just the opposite - to remove CoreOS from my list of things to look at. I am happy and sad for you both. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Re: Department of Education contact (BOGON listing)?
On 10/28/14 09:38 -0500, Jack Bates wrote: Anyone have a good contact? I emailed the whois for the IP network but haven't heard back yet. Didn't find any contact info in whois for ed.gov. :( ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov. ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduftcdnsp02.ed.gov. ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduptcdnsp01.ed.gov. ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduptcdnsp02.ed.gov. dig: couldn't get address for 'eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov' Unable to reach their nameservers from 104/8 networks. Other networks are fine. I also cannot retrieve glue records, but have them cached on my server: Fails (+trace implies +dnssec however): dig +short +trace ed.gov ns Works: ~$ dig @ns.olp.net ed.gov ns cut ;; ANSWER SECTION: ed.gov. 3478IN NS eduptcdnsp01.ed.gov. ed.gov. 3478IN NS eduftcdnsp02.ed.gov. ed.gov. 3478IN NS eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov. ed.gov. 3478IN NS eduptcdnsp02.ed.gov. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov.26896 IN A 165.224.21.6 eduftcdnsp01.ed.gov.26896 IN 2610:e8:907f:1:cd99:4fb7:bb7:2213 eduftcdnsp02.ed.gov.26896 IN A 165.224.21.5 eduftcdnsp02.ed.gov.26896 IN 2610:e8:907f:1:d093:1118:adf3:7473 eduptcdnsp01.ed.gov.26896 IN A 165.224.212.6 eduptcdnsp01.ed.gov.26896 IN 2610:e8:9080:1:88dc:90ef:b68:490 eduptcdnsp02.ed.gov.26896 IN A 165.224.212.5 eduptcdnsp02.ed.gov.26896 IN 2610:e8:9080:1:8c49:4c6a:b596:f07b The servers are responding: ~$ dig @165.224.21.6 www.ed.gov cut ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.ed.gov. 3600IN CNAME www.ed.gov.adtihosting.com. edtihosting.com is not retrievable in whois either, but its dns is cached as well. Their webpage (www.adtihosting.com) advertises itself as Localweb.com, and their website lists this contact information: Departments Technical Support: For questions relating to setting up a new account or questions about existing accounts please contact our technical department at 1-800-525-0031 or via e-mail supp...@localweb.com -- Dan White
OT: FOLO: LWN on Debian on multiple inits (systemd, etc)
Pursuant to our other ongoing WW thread: http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/ The comments on this come down rather solidly on both sides of the fence, and most of them are relatively thoughful. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Packet Loss in Atlanta
Hello nanog, I am getting reports from friends of mine in the ISP community that there are some issues in Atlanta with high latency and packet loss.. I don't see anything on my link to 56 Marietta but I was wondering if anyone else saw any problems out that way? Thanks in advance Nathan
Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
It *might* have been. Things cleared up yesterday. I initially thought it was the result of disabling DNSSEC on our primary resolvers, but am less certain that was the fix now as I don't see any issues with their config (per dnsviz). Ray On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:03:15PM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various *.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: .mil postmaster Contacts? We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from off-network as well. Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start with? navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having issues. Ray
t-mobile help
Would someone from T-Mobile be willing to contact me offline about some abuse issues we are having? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy
