On 8 Feb 2015, at 23:00, BPNoC Group wrote:
Mr Dobbins' slides/presentation gives an idea that a proxy (waf,
whatever) fits sitting unprotected among routers and application
servers, while its also stateful and fragile enough to deserve
previous protection.
from p.16 of the presentation in
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, February 6, 2015, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On 6 Feb 2015, at 23:23, Darden, Patrick wrote:
And when your opinion is an acknowledged universal constant, I will tip
my hat to you.
It's
Of course you can find firewalls that are crappy routers and you can find
routers that are crappy firewalls, but generally, the two are not mutually
exclusive.
I completely disagree w/ such or similar statements.
On the vendor datasheet it says different. On books it says different.
And on
You're missing the point.
I would never advocate for trying to deploy a Juniper MX in the role of a
firewall to provide a security boundary. I would never try to deploy a
Juniper SRX to provide a huge number of GRE tunnel terminations or other
sorts of aggregations of large numbers of
Someone from Sunynet? Please contact-me off list to clarify if you are BGP
transit to to a certain ASN spoofing my CIDR or if bgp as-path is
artificially messed.
Tried contact on su...@suny.edu w/o success.
Hello,
Some Juniper models actually do a very good job of being both.
In reality, a Firewall _IS_ a router, even if it's a bad one. Anything that
moves packets from one interface to another is a router.
Technically it’s quite not a precise assumption. While routing is much likely
an IP
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jeff McAdams je...@iglou.com wrote:
You're missing the point.
I'm not missing, I'm just diverting the point.
As I mentioned from a Linux box example, the fact that it can both act as a
router and a firewall does not mean it should. I disagree with the
On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2015, at 18:07 , William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
How about this: when Verizon starts decommissioning its IPv4
infrastructure on the basis that IPv6 is widespread enough to no
longer require the expense of
Any suggestions on what to tell ATT to get IPv6 added to a current account and
upgrade a 2wire router to 4wire with halfway decent performance and capability?
Any and all help would be appreciated.
Tom
Hi!
If you have he.net there - it will be the best choise.
On 06.02.15 19:26, Colton Conor wrote:
We have a network that is single homed with Level3 at this time in Dallas.
They already have BGP and their own ASN and IP setup. Who would you
recommend for a second provider in Dallas to blend
On Feb 8, 2015, at 05:40 , BPNoC Group bpnoc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course you can find firewalls that are crappy routers and you can find
routers that are crappy firewalls, but generally, the two are not mutually
exclusive.
I completely disagree w/ such or similar statements.
I have some use cases where I have Fortinet firewalls running full
ospf/ospfv3/bgp and it all pretty much just works without any issues. The CLI
is a bit cumbersome, but apart from that its fine.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Craig
Sent:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015, at 05:48 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
Any suggestions on what to tell ATT to get IPv6 added to a current
account and upgrade a 2wire router to 4wire with halfway decent
performance and capability?
I have no advice on the equipment upgrade, but I was able to add IPv6 to
my account by
The second half is easy. Do it your self. Turn the 2wire router into a
transparent device and put your own router in doing the PPPoE for you.
pfSense and M0n0wall support IPv6.
I am in ATT territory, but don't use them for Internet.(I use the local
cable company). But I know that several
On Feb 8, 2015, at 06:02 , Patrick Tracanelli eks...@freebsdbrasil.com.br
wrote:
Hello,
Some Juniper models actually do a very good job of being both.
In reality, a Firewall _IS_ a router, even if it's a bad one. Anything that
moves packets from one interface to another is a
Has anyone imagined this? away on increasing processing power or visual
clearance of what we already have, what could be the next HCI?
Setup a multi tenant setup between Nexus 7K and Juniper Net screen 5400 FW
using OSPF.
It went OK and worked. However when under traffic load/ less than.
Desirable results... OSPF peer failure / bounces etc.
However using BGP with Juniper SRX FW has been working great. No issues
thus far.
On Feb
17 matches
Mail list logo
