Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

We run Calix GPON / AE Platform works fairly nicely but does have it¹s cost. Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com On 2/10/15, 1:27 PM, "Mark T

Re: Comcast New England dropped for 5-15 min? Anyone

My boss has comcast at home in Milton, MA, said all was fine. Must have been prefix specific. Trace would die somewhere in level3 at the time. Was tracing to 8.8.8.8 On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Dan Brisson wrote: > FWIW...no problems here in Vermont on Comcast business. > > -dan > > > Dan Bri

Re: Comcast New England dropped for 5-15 min? Anyone

FWIW...no problems here in Vermont on Comcast business. -dan Dan Brisson Network Engineer University of Vermont On 2/10/15 8:45 PM, Kevin Kadow wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Andrey Khomyakov < khomyakov.and...@gmail.com> wrote: Hey, anyone had problems just now? My team and I at

RE: Cumulus List

I can help..contact me off list. Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Skeeve Stevens Date: 02/10/2015 5:44 PM (GMT-08:00) To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Cumulus List Hi all, I am looking to get a better understanding of s

Re: Comcast New England dropped for 5-15 min? Anyone

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Andrey Khomyakov < khomyakov.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, anyone had problems just now? My team and I at homes lost internet > access for about 10 min. I also had many sites drop off. Still digging, but > maybe trouble upstream? I'm in 50.133.128.0/17 at home. >

Cumulus List

Hi all, I am looking to get a better understanding of some features of Cumulus Linux their pre-sales is a bit inundated, but I am wondering if there is a Cisco-NSP or something similar out there for Cumulus... Thanks :) ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Founder & Chief Network Architect* eintelle

Re: Comcast New England dropped for 5-15 min? Anyone

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > Hey, anyone had problems just now? My team and I at homes lost internet > access for about 10 min. I also had many sites drop off. Still digging, but > maybe trouble upstream? I'm in 50.133.128.0/17 at home. Yah, we lost two offices wit

Comcast New England dropped for 5-15 min? Anyone

Hey, anyone had problems just now? My team and I at homes lost internet access for about 10 min. I also had many sites drop off. Still digging, but maybe trouble upstream? I'm in 50.133.128.0/17 at home. --Andrey

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

On 10/Feb/15 21:35, Frank Bulk wrote: > Unless each customer has in their own L3 domain, you'll also want some kind > of L2 isolation between ports (and also MFF) and IP source address > verification (so that people can't spoof addresses) for both DHPC and static > IP customers. And don't forget

RE: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Unless each customer has in their own L3 domain, you'll also want some kind of L2 isolation between ports (and also MFF) and IP source address verification (so that people can't spoof addresses) for both DHPC and static IP customers. And don't forget the IPv6 equivalents. Frank -Original Mes

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Hi, Generally, I haven’t seen many issues. I see our home Internet slow down once in a while, but I doubt its anything to do with the Planet devices but more so with the way the provider operates their network. Ammar > On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:05 PM, Ray Soucy wrote: > > Thank you, this is usef

Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion

Hey Eric, I did not see anyone else post this, but the NANOG BCOP (Best Current Operating Practices) group has released the following document to help guide new IPv6 allocation plans which you and others may find helpful: http://bcop.nanog.org/images/6/62/BCOP-IPv6_Subnetting.pdf Another useful d

Re: Need recommendations for high-feature, high-density L3 Switch

how about all in 1U (interconnect room switch, $$$/u) /kc -- Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Toronto Canada

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Thank you, this is useful information. From your perspective as a user, do things seem fairly stable? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ammar Zuberi wrote: > Hi, > > Here in Dubai they have a wide FTTH deployment (almost 80% of homes and > offices) with almost no copper in the service provider n

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Hi, Here in Dubai they have a wide FTTH deployment (almost 80% of homes and offices) with almost no copper in the service provider networks. They use these Planet devices in every deployment I've taken a look at so far. Ammar > On 10 Feb 2015, at 6:42 pm, Ray Soucy wrote: > > Price and funct

RE: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

We are small ISP. We used Linksys SPS208G for access level, and Cisco ME3400 for aggregation purposes. On Core level we use Cisco3560, now we have some plans to migrate to Cat 6500. -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Soucy Sent: Tuesday, Febru

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Ray Soucy wrote: What options are out there for Active-Ethernet hardware. Ideally something that could handle G.8032 and 802.1ad in hardware for the distribution side (24 or 48-port SFP metro switch) and something inexpensive for the access side but still managed (e.g. a

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Price and functionality-wise Planet MGSW-28240F and GSD-1020S look pretty close to what I'm looking for. Anyone have real experience with using them on a large scale? Performance? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Check out Mikrotik, Planet and TP-Link. > > > > > - > Mi

Re: UVerse question

On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:48:57 -0500 TR Shaw wrote: > Any suggestions on what to tell ATT to get IPv6 added to a current > account and upgrade a 2wire router to 4wire with halfway decent > performance and capability? > > Any and all help would be appreciated. > > Tom If ATT is still using 6rd the

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

We are using TP-LINK for ETTH, and it seems very good with a fair price. Only the problem is they like to make completely another device and sell it as the same part number but another "hardware revision" which is only written by small letters on the device itself. So you have to keep an eye on it

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

On 10/Feb/15 15:31, Ray Soucy wrote: > I'm really looking for something cheap to keep costs down for a > proof-of-concept. The stuff from Cisco and even Ciena is a bit more > expensive than my target. I hear Cisco were discontinuing the ME2600X, but not sure if that is still happening. Do you fi

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

Check out Mikrotik, Planet and TP-Link. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Ray Soucy" To: "NANOG" Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:31:22 AM Subject: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware One thing I'm personally

FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

One thing I'm personally interested in is the growth of municipal FTTx that's starting to happen around the US and possibly applying that model to highly rural areas (e.g. 10 mile long town with no side streets, existing utility polls, 250 or so homes) and doing a realistic cost analysis of what th

Re: UVerse question

AT&T will do a bonded VDSL2 connection in cases where a single connection isn't getting enough throughput. Also, be aware that the device may now be branded as an Arris, but Tim is correct that it's normally a NVG589 for new installs. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-500

Re: UVerse question

What is a “4wire” modem? Is that a Chinese knockoff of a 2wire brand? ;-) Or are you referring to a pair-bonded modem? AT&T seems to only offer the pair-bonded device (in most cases, a Motorola NVG589) when you have their 45mbps “Power” service. If anything, you could always upgrade to the 45mb