Re: Multiple Spanning Tree Instance 0

2015-03-04 Thread Tom Hill
On 27/02/15 11:03, Chris Marget wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Graham Johnston > wrote: > >> > We are planning a migration from Rapid PVST+ to Multiple Spanning Tree to >> > better support a mixed vendor environment. My question today is about MST >> > Instance 0. In practice do you

Re: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Matthew Crocker
> > On Mar 4, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 04/03/2015 21:33, Jay Hennigan wrote: >> We used Livingston Portmaster 3 back in the day. Front to back >> ventilation, ran cool as a cucumber, plug it in and it just worked. >> Awesome gear until Lucent bought the company to kill the p

Re: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Colin Johnston
energis pop the cab doors would not open due to heat warping after loaded with two tnt max colin Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Mar 2015, at 21:04, "Ricky Beam" wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 20:52:44 -0500, Martin Hannigan >> wrote: >> Remember the Ascend MAX TNT and the sideways left-right a

Re: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 04/03/2015 21:33, Jay Hennigan wrote: > We used Livingston Portmaster 3 back in the day. Front to back > ventilation, ran cool as a cucumber, plug it in and it just worked. > Awesome gear until Lucent bought the company to kill the product in > favor of their Ascend TNT space heaters. Ascend ki

RE: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Naslund, Steve
>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 20:52:44 -0500, Martin Hannigan >> >> wrote: >>> Remember the Ascend MAX TNT and the sideways left-right airflow? >> ... >> >> Indeed I do. I see you've heard the story of PSINet melting components >> as well. >> >> We used USR(3Com) TotalControl hardware: vertical venti

RE: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Naslund, Steve
I remember that there was an Ascend DSLAM built on the same chassis and it was collocated by someone into Ameritech central offices. Ameritech shut them all down saying that there was no way, no how that the device could be NEBS compliant. I don't know how that fight ever turned out, they were

Re: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 3/4/15 13:04, Ricky Beam wrote: > On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 20:52:44 -0500, Martin Hannigan > wrote: >> Remember the Ascend MAX TNT and the sideways left-right airflow? > ... > > Indeed I do. I see you've heard the story of PSINet melting components > as well. > > We used USR(3Com) TotalControl har

Re: optical gear cooling requirements

2015-03-04 Thread Ricky Beam
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 20:52:44 -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote: Remember the Ascend MAX TNT and the sideways left-right airflow? ... Indeed I do. I see you've heard the story of PSINet melting components as well. We used USR(3Com) TotalControl hardware: vertical venting. The chimney effect w

Looking some one from advance technical help from Godaddy

2015-03-04 Thread Grzegorz Dabrowski
Hi, As in subject because I'm bashing my head against first line of support and they said I'm wrong good bye. So would somebody be so kind and write me privately (It's about GLUE record and where they came from) Many Thanks, -- Greg

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

2015-03-04 Thread Dave Taht
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 04/03/2015 16:26, Dave Taht wrote: >> A geeky household with dad doing skype, mom uploading to facebook, a >> kid doing a game, and another kid doing netflix, however, is common. >> And, it is truly amazing how many households have more tha

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

2015-03-04 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 04/03/2015 16:26, Dave Taht wrote: > A geeky household with dad doing skype, mom uploading to facebook, a > kid doing a game, and another kid doing netflix, however, is common. > And, it is truly amazing how many households have more than one device > per person nowadays. and $kid running a bit

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

2015-03-04 Thread Dave Taht
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Scott Helms wrote: >> >> I don't know many schools that are open at midnight to accept thumb >> drives. > > I think he was trying to point out that most school libraries, and their > computer labs, open before classes start. Ice never heard of a school > deadline t

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

2015-03-04 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Chuck Church wrote: > Since this has turned into a discussion on upload vs download speed, > figured I'd throw in a point I haven't really brought up. For the most part, > uploading isn't really a time-sensitive activity to the general (as in 99% of > th

Re: Cox Communications Peering

2015-03-04 Thread Aled Morris
Generic advice... I'd be more inclined to find someone who already peers with them, who can sell you partial transit; especially if they can hand this to you at a location where this peering happens. Aled On 4 March 2015 at 14:51, Conley Bone wrote: > Someone suggested I rephrase my question..

Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

2015-03-04 Thread Lamar Owen
On 03/03/2015 08:07 AM, Scott Helms wrote: For consumers to care about symmetrical upload speeds as much as you're saying why have they been choosing to use technologies that don't deliver that in WiFi and LTE? For consumers to have choice, there must be an available alternative that is affordab

Re: Cox Communications Peering

2015-03-04 Thread Conley Bone
Someone suggested I rephrase my question... Does anyone have a contact at Cox for *paid* peering? I realize I am not going to get settlement free peering with Cox, but I have a need to reduce the number of hops between my network and theirs to shorten the distance between some of my customers