Peerless Network, Hypercube, Inteliquent, and Intelepeer all have switch
equipment in Chicago. Inteliquent or Peerless would be your best choices.
They run alternative tandem services in those markets so local calls will
remain in area. Hypercube does offer a similar product, I'm just not sure
if t
That's why I asked for one with everything local.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:56:47 PM
Subject: Re: SIP trunking prov
Nor will the fact that your particular trunking provider is local, so I’m not
sure what you seek to accomplish, then.
Owen
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 12:24 , Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I have several Asterisk VMs running in my own facility, but that doesn't
> change the fact that a particular provide
After updating my SPF record per Gareth's recommendation, email now
seems to be flowing to GMail properly.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || |die
On 07/23/2015 02:54 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
Kudos to Gareth T. who pointed out that I forgot to update my SPF
record, which includes a "-all".
I
Hi NANOG,
The Open Compute Project "OCP" had, at least that I can recall but now can
not find, a ladder tray deployment spec in the data center working group.
It called for tray to span the middle of the aisle as I remember it. Anyone
recall or have a pointer to it? My favorite search engine and t
Once upon a time, Grant Taylor via NANOG said:
> I am having problems sending email to GMail from my new (< 2 weeks
> old) Linode VPS.
May not be the case here, but I had an issue with my Linode and IPv6
email (not with gmail.com though). If you just "request IPv6", you get
a single /128 out of
Hi Christopher,
Unless my eyes are deceiving me, I think "host" ate a colon in "::" for you.
I *think* that I have forward and reverse DNS set up properly for both
IPv4 and IPv6.
#[gtaylor@tncsrv04:~]$ dig a tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net
tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net. 3600 IN A 45.33.28.24
$ host 2600:3c00:f03c:91ff:fe26:8849
Host 2600:3c00:f03c:91ff:fe26:8849 not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
you probably also want to fix that...
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
> Kudos to Gareth T. who pointed out that I forgot to update my SPF record,
> which includes a "-all
Kudos to Gareth T. who pointed out that I forgot to update my SPF
record, which includes a "-all".
I've updated my SPF record and will try again after my old info expires
out of caches.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 07/23/2015 02:42 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering
Hi,
I was wondering if there were any GMail contacts on NANOG that might
contact me either on or off list for some help.
I am having problems sending email to GMail from my new (< 2 weeks old)
Linode VPS.
tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (IPv4: 45.33.28.24, IPv6:
2600:3c00:f03c:91ff:fe26:88
I have several Asterisk VMs running in my own facility, but that doesn't change
the fact that a particular provider's media gateway that SIP reinvites me to is
somewhere non-local.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
Fro
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:25:33 -0400, "Justin M. Streiner" said:
> If a customer is legitimately trying to reach someone in one of the
> affected IP ranges and failing, at some point, they will either a) give up
> and try later, or b) contact their provider to try to find out what's
> going on.
You
Agreed. It costs more to transport an IX to another location than the IX makes
off of the port they sold you.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush"
To: "Charles Gucker"
Cc: "North American Network Ope
I would expect DE-CIX to repeat what they've done elsewhere and expand the IX
into any reasonable building in the metro area, greatly increasing its
available member count and bringing the IX to places where Equinix isn't.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Nicholas Warren wrote:
>
> How will the customer know the ISP is blocking the traffic? Does the FCC
>> make ISPs disclose this information?
>>
>
> If a customer is legitimately trying to reach someone in one of the
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Nicholas Warren wrote:
How will the customer know the ISP is blocking the traffic? Does the
FCC make ISPs disclose this information?
If a customer is legitimately trying to reach someone in one of the
affected IP ranges and failing, at some point, they will either a) give
Hi,
Is there anyone on this list that can get me in touch with someone at
Google/Gmail?
I would like to discuss a suggested improvement with them in regard to
RFC-compliance of DKIM/DMARC.
Please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatur
How will the customer know the ISP is blocking the traffic? Does the FCC make
ISPs disclose this information?
Thank you,
- Nich Warren
On 07/22/2015 09:01 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> You're certainly free to block whatever traffic you wish, but your
> customers might not appreciate a heavy
On 07/22/2015 09:01 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
You're certainly free to block whatever traffic you wish, but your
customers might not appreciate a heavy-handed approach to stopping bad
traffic at the gates.
As opposed to not being able to pass traffic at all? After all, isn't
the goal of a
19 matches
Mail list logo
