Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

[Connor Wilkins]

On 2015-09-06 19:18, Scott Weeks wrote:

It could be much easier.  Folks that care about the
mailing list rules, want to be courteous to list
folks and want to use their company email, rather
than one that inserts no disclaimer, could put 15
lines of blank as part of their signature.  This
would force all the crap far enough down the page
that it wouldn't be bothersome.

scott


Everyone:

Honestly.. the best method is to not let it bug you anymore. It's only a 
seething issue to you because you let it be.


You're suggesting that one use 15 blank lines just so that you don't 
have to see any of these self-inflicted transgressions. It would be much 
simpler and less taxing on all involved to simply not let it bother you 
anymore.


"Impossible!" you may cry.. but I don't believe so. I used to be the 
same. It's easily beatable. You could send twenty paragraphs of 
so-called 'legal text' suffixed to your email and I wouldn't so much as 
bat an eye. It may take some personal effort but you need to learn to 
'let it go'.


This is a non-issue in the scope of things and you've made a mountain 
out of this grain of sand. Brush it aside and move on. It isn't worth 
your time.

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Nick Hilliard]

On 07/09/2015 21:23, James Downs wrote:
> What do you mean when you say “software defined networking”? Do you have
> a particular problem or use case you are approaching?

since when was that a requirement for SDN?

Nick

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Mike Hammett]

I thought it was purely for vendors to sell you more crap? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Nick Hilliard"  
To: nanog@nanog.org 
Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 4:14:38 PM 
Subject: Re: Software Defined Networking 

On 07/09/2015 21:23, James Downs wrote: 
> What do you mean when you say “software defined networking”? Do you have 
> a particular problem or use case you are approaching? 

since when was that a requirement for SDN? 

Nick 

Re: Software Defined Networking

[James Downs]

> On Sep 4, 2015, at 07:40, Rod Beck  wrote:
> 
> Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?

What do you mean when you say “software defined networking”? Do you have a 
particular problem or use case you are approaching?

Cheers,
-j