Re: Routes leaked by AS393742 via AS16397

Hi, I already send an email to Daniel (dan...@biyort.com) I hope to receive a prompt replay. Thanks to all for info and help. Regards & Ciao ! Marco 2015-10-01 1:03 GMT+02:00 Robert Webb : > Although, you did provide a little more detail. :-) > > > > > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:59:22 -0700 > H

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Chris Grundemann" > > > After receiving several off-line inquiries about the status of BCOP in > > North America I think it's appropriate to send a general announcement > > here. > > > > The biggest n

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/30/2015 8:25 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Guessing no one cares. Darwinism. - - ferg - -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: G

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

- Original Message - > From: "Chris Grundemann" > After receiving several off-line inquiries about the status of BCOP in > North America I think it's appropriate to send a general announcement > here. > > The biggest news here is that the current NANOG Board of Directors has > disbanded

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

In message , Baldur Norddahl writes: > On 30 September 2015 at 21:41, McElearney, Kevin < > kevin_mcelear...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > > > This only helps 1/3 of the challenge. Even with most Comcast customers > > able to obtain IPv6 today and over 70% provisioned with IPv6, less than > > 20%

Re: Routes leaked by AS393742 via AS16397

Although, you did provide a little more detail. :-) On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:59:22 -0700 Hugo Slabbert wrote: On Wed 2015-Sep-30 17:43:40 -0400, Robert Webb wrote: https://ipinfo.io/AS393742 ...I'm so behind the times; my response would have been: $ finger 393...@peeringdb.com Genera

Re: Routes leaked by AS393742 via AS16397

On Wed 2015-Sep-30 17:43:40 -0400, Robert Webb wrote: https://ipinfo.io/AS393742 ...I'm so behind the times; my response would have been: $ finger 393...@peeringdb.com General Network Information --- Network Name : Biyort USA Corp Name Aliases : Prim

Re: Routes leaked by AS393742 via AS16397

https://ipinfo.io/AS393742 On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:24:44 +0200 Marco Paesani wrote: Hi, anyboody know this AS ?? Upstream AS3549 Thanks ! Regards -- Marco Paesani MPAE Srl Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: ma...@paesani.it

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On 30 September 2015 at 21:41, McElearney, Kevin < kevin_mcelear...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > This only helps 1/3 of the challenge. Even with most Comcast customers > able to obtain IPv6 today and over 70% provisioned with IPv6, less than > 20% of the traffic is IPv6. There is still a need to

Routes leaked by AS393742 via AS16397

Hi, anyboody know this AS ?? Upstream AS3549 Thanks ! Regards -- Marco Paesani MPAE Srl Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: ma...@paesani.it

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On 9/29/15, 4:37 PM, "David Hubbard" wrote: >Had an idea the other day; we just need someone with a lot of cash >(google, apple, etc) to buy Netflix and then make all new releases >v6-only for the first 48 hours. I bet my lame Brighthouse and Fios >service would be v6-enabled before the end of t

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

In a message written on Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:37:19PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote: > Had an idea the other day; we just need someone with a lot of cash > (google, apple, etc) to buy Netflix and then make all new releases > v6-only for the first 48 hours. I bet my lame Brighthouse and Fios > serv

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

On 30 Sep 2015, at 10:17, Mike Hammett wrote: If NANOG isn't developing and publishing BCOPs, what's the point of NANOG other than a mailing list? --- Roland Dobbins

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

Hi Suresh, I believe all the information you seek is on our wiki: http://nabcop.org. Be sure to look over the list of topics under the "Jump In" heading. To your question about reinventing wheels specifically: There's two aspects to that I believe. The first is that we have no intention to "make

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

Late to the party but which best current practices were these and - as the board asked - how much of it reinvents the several other best practice wheels around? --srs > On 30-Sep-2015, at 8:47 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > If NANOG isn't developing and publishing BCOPs, what's the point of NANO

Re: Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

If NANOG isn't developing and publishing BCOPs, what's the point of NANOG other than a mailing list? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Chris Grundemann" To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Quick Update on the North American BCOP Efforts

Hail NANOGers! After receiving several off-line inquiries about the status of BCOP in North America I think it's appropriate to send a general announcement here. The biggest news here is that the current NANOG Board of Directors has disbanded the NANOG BCOP Committee. The stated rationale for thi

Re: SNMP - monitoring large number of devices

Hello, On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:20:19PM +0200, Pavel Dimow wrote: > recently I have been tasked with a NMS project. The idea is to pool about > 20 OID's from 50k cable modems in less then 5 minutes (yes, I know it's a > one million OID's). Before you say check out some very professional and > ex

Re: SNMP - monitoring large number of devices

Please try the following/ https://statseeker.com/ Sent from my virtual office On Sep 30, 2015, at 09:44, Pavel Dimow mailto:paveldi...@gmail.com>> wrote: Thank you all for you suggestions, I knew it that NANOG is a perfect place for those kind of questions. I will discuss your comments with

Script for NAT timeout detection

Hello All, I have some devices connected under NAT that is not under my control. Is there some software/script to detect NAT session timeout to adjust keepalives? Thank you!

Re: SNMP - monitoring large number of devices

Check out Science Logic. Their platform is made to scale to these levels. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote: > Thank you all for you suggestions, I knew it that NANOG is a perfect place > for those kind of questions. > I will discuss your comments with my colleagues to see what

RE: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

With Netflix people might just dump the service, however, if you change all the social diarrhea sites (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc...) over to v6 only overnight, you either force the net to adopt v6 or people to talk to each other. Either way, it's a win-win. -Original Message- Fr

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

s/creating an/exacerbating the/ Owen > On Sep 29, 2015, at 22:42 , Mark Andrews wrote: > > > Ban the selling of IPv4 only home routers. The continued sale of > these devices is just creating a e-waste problem. > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia >

Re: SNMP - monitoring large number of devices

Thank you all for you suggestions, I knew it that NANOG is a perfect place for those kind of questions. I will discuss your comments with my colleagues to see what would be the best solution. Once again thank you all for your valuable suggestions, I hope I will update you soon with some results/tes