Fw: new message

[Don Gould]

Hey!



New message, please read 



Don Gould



---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de 
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Fw: new message

[Alexandre Snarskii]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alexandre Snarskii

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[jdenoy]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

jde...@jdlabs.fr

Fw: new message

[Brandon Butterworth]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brandon Butterworth

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Aaron C . de Bruyn]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Aaron C. de Bruyn

Fw: new message

[Aaron C . de Bruyn]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Aaron C. de Bruyn

Fw: new message

[Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo

Fw: new message

[Eliot Lear]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Eliot Lear

Fw: new message

[Aaron C . de Bruyn]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Aaron C. de Bruyn

Fw: new message

[Fabrice FLAUSS]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Fabrice FLAUSS

Fw: new message

[FRLinux]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

FRLinux

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Bill Blackford]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bill Blackford

Fw: new message

[Alexandre Snarskii]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alexandre Snarskii

Fw: new message

[Adam Armstrong]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Armstrong

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Alessandro Ratti]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alessandro Ratti

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[Alexandre Snarskii]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alexandre Snarskii

Fw: new message

[Don Gould]

Hey!



New message, please read 



Don Gould



---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de 
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Fw: new message

[Bill Blackford]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bill Blackford

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[Ben Bartsch]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Ben Bartsch

Fw: new message

[Abdulkadir Egal]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Abdulkadir Egal

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Brandon Ross]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brandon Ross

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Abdulkadir Egal]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Abdulkadir Egal

Fw: new message

[Aaron C . de Bruyn]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Aaron C. de Bruyn

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[Edward Dore]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Edward Dore

Fw: new message

[Antonio Querubin]

Hey!



New message, please read 



Antonio Querubin



---
Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! 
Antivirus está activa.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Fw: new message

[Arturo Servin]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Arturo Servin

Fw: new message

[Abdulkadir Egal]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Abdulkadir Egal

Fw: new message

[Abdulkadir Egal]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Abdulkadir Egal

Fw: new message

[Andrew Latham]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Andrew Latham

Fw: new message

[Brian Raaen]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brian Raaen

Fw: new message

[FRLinux]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

FRLinux

Fw: new message

[Abdulkadir Egal]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Abdulkadir Egal

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[Brian Raaen]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brian Raaen

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Andrew Latham]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Andrew Latham

Fw: new message

[Daryl G . Jurbala]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Daryl G. Jurbala

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[Chris Rogers]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Chris Rogers

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[Alessandro Ratti]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alessandro Ratti

Fw: new message

[Bob Bradlee]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Bob Bradlee

Fw: new message

[nanog-bounces]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

nanog-boun...@nanog.org

Fw: new message

[nanog-bounces]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

nanog-boun...@nanog.org

Fw: new message

[Brian Raaen]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brian Raaen

Fw: new message

[Brian Raaen]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brian Raaen

Fw: new message

[Adam Fields]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Fields

Fw: new message

[Adam Fields]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Fields

Fw: new message

[Adam Fields]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Fields

Fw: new message

[Alessandro Ratti]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alessandro Ratti

Fw: new message

[nanog-bounces]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

nanog-boun...@nanog.org

Fw: new message

[Adam Fields]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Fields

Fw: new message

[Alex Band]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alex Band

Fw: new message

[Adam Fields]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Fields

Fw: new message

[Adam Fields]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Adam Fields

Fw: new message

[Barry Raveendran Greene]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Barry Raveendran Greene

Fw: new message

[Alex Band]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alex Band

Fw: new message

[Alex Band]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Alex Band

Fw: new message

[Brian Raaen]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

Brian Raaen

Fw: new message

[full-disclosure-bounces]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

full-disclosure-boun...@lists.grok.org.uk

Fw: new message

[jdenoy]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

jde...@jdlabs.fr

Fw: new message

[jdenoy]

Hey!

 

New message, please read 

 

jde...@jdlabs.fr

Re: IGP choice

[Randy Bush]

i may have missed it, but one of my fave features of is-is is that it is
a link-local non-ip protocol.  hard to disrupt/attack remotely.

randy

Re: IGP choice

[Måns Nilsson]

Subject: IGP choice Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:57:01PM +0200 Quoting 
marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr (marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr):
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ?
> IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ?
> Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some international
> ISP/carriers design choice, please.

We use IS-IS in our network mostly because I was around when a bunch
of NREN switched to IS-IS some 15 years ago, and it stuck. It is, as
has been noted, mostly a matter of preference, but there is one or two
technical arguments for IS-IS that tip the scales for me;

- One IGP for both v6 and v4. Mostly interesting if you are running a
lot of traffic outside VRFen. But nevertheless a good  thing to keep v6
and v4 in sync.

- No leakage. Not many external peers speak IS-IS on their peering
interfaces, so chances are that even if I do, nothing will fall over.
This of course also applies to access interfaces, where my hosts won't 
even have an OSI stack and thus won't try to process the frames. 

The argument for OSPF mostly is that there are several FOSS OSPF dæmons
for Posixly machines, making it a good choice for things like anycast
name servers or similar. We do run it for precisely this setup. 

Do read the presentation Vijay Gill made and that people keep pointing to. 
It is a very good account of how to purge OSPF in favour of IS-IS. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
I'm also pre-POURED pre-MEDITATED and pre-RAPHAELITE!!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature