Re: CIDR Utilization

2015-10-30 Thread Theodore Baschak
> On Oct 30, 2015, at 7:51 PM, John Steve Nash > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for any tool or a way I could specify a CIDR and the prefixes > that are being used within this CIDR and the tool show me all free > supernets. > I've used subnetsmngr for this in the past. Proper usage of it thr

Re: CIDR Utilization

2015-10-30 Thread joel jaeggli
most reasonable ipam tools will track or express unallocated vs allocated space. netdot has a lovely address-space container/block view for managing free vs allocated space joel On 10/31/15 9:51 AM, John Steve Nash wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for any tool or a way I could specify a CIDR and th

CIDR Utilization

2015-10-30 Thread John Steve Nash
Hi, I'm looking for any tool or a way I could specify a CIDR and the prefixes that are being used within this CIDR and the tool show me all free supernets. Example: 192.168.0.0/24 - CIDR Used subnet's: 192.168.0.1/32 192.168.0.8/27 192.168.0.64/26 192.168.0.68/32 192.168.0.96/29 Tool Result =

Re: IP => Location on the planet

2015-10-30 Thread Daniel Sterling
Turn on all the google tracking bugs on the phone and get a GPS fix outside. http://android.stackexchange.com/questions/4715/how-may-i-submit-a-wifi-hotspot-to-androids-database-for-a-better-triangulation/4716#4716 On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: > On 10/30/15 3:31 PM, Lauren

Re: IP => Location on the planet

2015-10-30 Thread Alan Clegg
On 10/30/15 3:31 PM, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote: > No follow up required or expected. > > FYI geo-location fans. > > While sitting on a toilet in a hotel in Kansas City, Missouri, US of A, > I chanced to log-on to Facebook from my Kindle, and the lap-top in the > on the desk in another room,

Re: Microsoft Geo-IP Admin needed

2015-10-30 Thread Mehmet Akcin
I will connect you offlist Mehmet On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > Can anyone point me to a Microsoft Geo-IP admin? Their Geo-IP for > live.com/outlook.com seems to be rather outdated. > > We get complaints for 85.195.208.0/20 and 85.195.224.0/19, pointing to > Antarctic

Microsoft Geo-IP Admin needed

2015-10-30 Thread Fredy Kuenzler
Can anyone point me to a Microsoft Geo-IP admin? Their Geo-IP for live.com/outlook.com seems to be rather outdated. We get complaints for 85.195.208.0/20 and 85.195.224.0/19, pointing to Antarctic instead of Switzerland. Any commercial Geo-IP shows correct information, but Office product activatio

IP => Location on the planet

2015-10-30 Thread Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
No follow up required or expected. FYI geo-location fans. While sitting on a toilet in a hotel in Kansas City, Missouri, US of A, I chanced to log-on to Facebook from my Kindle, and the lap-top in the on the desk in another room, Facebook alerted that I had logged on from Caracas, Venezuela.

Re: Satellites and submarine cables

2015-10-30 Thread Sean Donelan
Dyn Research, Doug Madory, has a good blog post looking at the physical threats affecting submarine cables; as well as covering recent historical submarine cable outages due to human action. http://research.dyn.com/2015/10/the-threat-of-telecom-sabotage/ And also a very nice infographic by Ca

Re: IGP choice

2015-10-30 Thread Mark Tinka
On 30/Oct/15 15:34, Matthew Petach wrote: > It is rather nice that IS-IS does not require level-2 to be > contiguous, unlike area 0 in OSPF. It is a valid topology > in IS-IS to have different level-2 areas connected by > level-1 areas, though you do have to be somewhat > careful about what rou

Level 3 issues in Chicago

2015-10-30 Thread Randy Carpenter
A network that we manage is having trouble getting to several sites. The common point of failure appears to be Level 3 in Chicago. Connections work fine from our direct upstream, so it appears that Level 3 is not allowing traffic sourced from the net block in question. Can someone from Level 3

Re: IGP choice

2015-10-30 Thread Matthew Petach
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Dave Bell wrote: > On 22 October 2015 at 19:41, Mark Tinka wrote: >> The "everything must connect to Area 0" requirement of OSPF was limiting >> for me back in 2008. > > I'm unsure if this is a serious argument, but its such a poor point > today. Everything has t