In message
, Baldur
Norddahl writes:
> On 25 November 2015 at 02:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > It's a hint for the amount of space you need. What else would you
> > put in there other than that value. If you get more than you need
> > then there is no problem. If you get less than you need
So what did we do. I used to use a relay type system in 2007-10 in my
previous data centre life. It¹s pretty good but a bit ³industrial². It¹s
also so 2007 (even 1990) and doesn¹t scale well when you are trying to do
3,000 racks and 6,000 doors per facility.
Part of the scaling issue was the door l
On 25 November 2015 at 02:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It's a hint for the amount of space you need. What else would you
> put in there other than that value. If you get more than you need
> then there is no problem. If you get less than you need then you
> have a problem.
>
> I've got a CPE with
In message
, Baldur Norddahl writes:
> On 25 November 2015 at 00:36, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > Give PD is designed to allow you to have multiple delegation requests
> > from one router to the dhcp server (router) and manage them
> > independently. Just request prefixes as you need them. If th
On 25 November 2015 at 00:36, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Give PD is designed to allow you to have multiple delegation requests
> from one router to the dhcp server (router) and manage them
> independently. Just request prefixes as you need them. If the
> dhcp server (router) doesn't have any availab
Tom,
Could you expand further on this?
On 11/25/2015 07:29 AM, Tom Hill wrote:
And in relation to Brocade: I'd feel very uncomfortable throwing any
*new* money at MLXe, CER or CES. Strategy for those families seems to
have fallen off of a cliff.
In message <42270.1448383...@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
writes:
> --==_Exmh_1448383626_2779P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:39:54 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
> > And a /56 gives you 256 subnets. When you remove unnecessary
> > heirac
On 24/11/15 21:16, dco...@hammerfiber.com wrote:
> A 7606-S can be purchased refurbished for like 90% off list price. The
> market is seriously glutted with them.
Not sure the OP was talking about 7600s. They're mostly End-of-Life, and
not in any way suited to the OP's requirements (MLAG missing,
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 13:51 , Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> On 24/11/15 22:47, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:27 , Miquel van Smoorenburg
>>> wrote:
>>> In article you
>>> write:
Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of development
and real ru
On 24/11/15 22:47, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:27 , Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
In article you write:
Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of development
and real running code for complete implementations throughout any
sort of site hierarchy.
Well, it wo
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:27 , Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> In article you write:
>> Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of development
>> and real running code for complete implementations throughout any
>> sort of site hierarchy.
>
> Well, it works for us. Connect a
I love the MLXe as a platform. Especially for a campus style switch.
Also Cisco really isn't expensive. Not for this type of application.
A 7606-S can be purchased refurbished for like 90% off list price.
The market is seriously glutted with them.
Quoting Josh Reynolds :
Have you look
In article you write:
>Unfortunately, PD is really still in its infancy in terms of development
>and real running code for complete implementations throughout any
>sort of site hierarchy.
Well, it works for us. Connect a second router (Fritz!box) behind
the primary one and it works. We can't see
Have you looked at the brocade MLXe line?
On Nov 24, 2015 12:05 PM, "David Hubbard"
wrote:
> Curious if anyone's used the 7280 and wants to share their experience?
> I'm looking at it primarily for three reasons, MLAG (i.e. multi-chassis
> LACP), large ARP/MAC table (256k entries) and large IPv6
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:47 AM
To: Mark Andrews
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions
>If you have a *workable* solution for the case where you're hand
Curious if anyone's used the 7280 and wants to share their experience?
I'm looking at it primarily for three reasons, MLAG (i.e. multi-chassis
LACP), large ARP/MAC table (256k entries) and large IPv6 neighbor table
(256k entries). For the table sizes we would like out of one pair of
switches, we'd
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:47:06 -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu said:
> Aternatively, if you have a algorithm for hierarchical deployment that
> doesn't burn through bits as fast, we'd love to hear it..
That will teach me to reply to stuff before reading *all* my e-mail (actually,
probably not).
Hot
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:39:54 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
> And a /56 gives you 256 subnets. When you remove unnecessary
> heirachical delegation / routing that still supports a reasonable
> sized home network.
If you have a *workable* solution for the case where you're handed a /56
and are running
Hi Owen,
> To me, net neutrality isn’t as much about what you charge the customer for
> the data, it’s about
> whether you prioritize certain classes of traffic to the detriment of others
> in terms of
> service delivery.
>
> If T-Mobile were taking money from the video streaming services or on
Not so much to Keenan, but the thread as a whole.
It continually amazes me the lack comprehension of the entire network world so
many on this list have. They've confined to their little bubble of 100GigE
pipes everywhere and everyone should just have balls to the walls everything
all of the ti
20 matches
Mail list logo
