Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

Mark Andrews writes: > The DHCP server usually is sitting > in a data center on the other side of the country with zero ability > to inject approptiate routes. Not too sure about that. At least, that's not what we do. We run the DHCPv6 and DHCP servers on our BNGs (or BRAS or

Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

> > The DHCP relay could also have injected routes but that is a second > > class solution. > > DHCP relays *are* second class solutions :) Unfortunately they cannot > always be avoided in the semi-L2-environments like ISP access networks > often are. Each to his own, I guess. Some of us are

Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

> Well the requesting router could announce the route. ISC's client > has hooks that allow this to be done. That is, after all, how > routing is designed to work. The DHCP server usually is sitting > in a data center on the other side of the country with zero ability > to inject approptiate

RE: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

Keenan Tims wrote: > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? > > I'm surprised you're supporting T-Mob here Owen. To me it's pretty > clear: they are charging more for bits that are not streaming video. > That's not neutral treatment from a policy

RE: Bluehost.com

The bottom line is the value/price ratio. We should all be working to add value. By any means necessary. The pitfall of low priced "services", is that it's hard to balance the support level and lower price for services. If Bluehost and lower end web hosters can completely do away with the