On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, Jeremy Austin wrote:
Let me be a consumer advocate for a moment. One of the reasons consumers
are averse to usage-based billing is that the tech industry has not put
good tools into their hands. While it is possible to disable automatic
updates, set Windows 10's network set
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 08:01 , Jeremy Austin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
>>
>> The best solution for everybody is the solution most consumers are adverse
>> to, which is usage based billing. Granted, many times the providers have
>> shot themselves in the fo
I have an idea. Indianapolis Cybercrime should stop playing politics and
treat people like me who are willing to help, and were hugely successful
with respect, and not like a mob informant.
That said, post Snowden, I doubt I would go back... even with Brian Kils
bullshit.
Andrew D Kirch.
On Sund
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 20:45:25 -0500, "Eric Rogers" said:
> Thank you for all that have responded, and this response has been the
> majority, to leave well enough alone. I guess I was hoping that maybe I could
> offer a new way to help narrow this search down.
The only thing that's more likely to g
Thank you for all that have responded, and this response has been the majority,
to leave well enough alone. I guess I was hoping that maybe I could offer a
new way to help narrow this search down. It has been extremely frustrating to
see someone so blatantly cocky in how he is taunting the aut
Report it to the authorities and trust that they can handle it,..no matter
how difficult that is. Remember your place that you are just the
admin/operator and not the hero. If they need your help, law enforcement
will ask for it.
Sucks but what would you do if you found his IP address? Go to his h
Given that a lot of these updates are happening in the background
without any interaction with the users
maybe for your customers, but not so true for our user base or others
with which i have experience. wise folk want control of patching. and
it's not only IT departments, but end users.
Th
John Doe end user doesn't even know what updating is, much less wants to
control it or even do it.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush"
To: "John Levine"
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Gr
I think if the FBI wants your help, they'll let you know.
In the meantime, I would probably avoid anything that looked like you are
spying on your customers, especially if you are explicitly targeting
customers who are attempting to anonymize their traffic (for whatever
reason). No matter how well
I’m pretty sure that is what TOR was designed to prevent. While your intent may
be altruistic, technologically speaking, there is no difference between that
and say Iran or China sniffing out traffic.
> On Jan 10, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Eric Rogers wrote:
>
> Is there any way to sniff for that ty
I'll keep a look out
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016, 5:02 PM Eric Rogers wrote:
> Our local community has recently had threats where the user has a
> FaceBook profile and is threatening the schools, and several surrounding
> schools, saying he is going to shoot everyone and blow them up... This
> is an in
Even if you find somebody running TOR, you can't see inside it. They also
could simply be running an exit node, or $reason.
On Jan 10, 2016 5:02 PM, "Eric Rogers" wrote:
> Our local community has recently had threats where the user has a
> FaceBook profile and is threatening the schools, and seve
Our local community has recently had threats where the user has a
FaceBook profile and is threatening the schools, and several surrounding
schools, saying he is going to shoot everyone and blow them up... This
is an investigation, but it is getting out of hand. Several police/FBI
raids, but yielde
>>> as for carriers pipes...will, if multicast was seriously taken up
>>> then eg OS updates could be streamed out on regular updates
>
> Given that a lot of these updates are happening in the background
> without any interaction with the users
maybe for your customers, but not so true for our us
>> as for carriers pipes...will, if multicast was seriously taken up then eg OS
>> updates could be streamed out on regular updates
Given that a lot of these updates are happening in the background
without any interaction with the users, I'd think they'd be ideal for
network-un-neutral traffic sha
(chewing my pop-corn) Eh... I would like to have that kind of problems!
Here we sell a residental 1Gbps for $5/mo with really unlimited traffic,
and have a lot of complaint calls if there is slightly less than 1Gbps
for that particular users.
THAT is how the high competitive market works! ;)
On
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:04:13 +, Alan Buxey said:
> as for carriers pipes...will, if multicast was seriously taken up then eg OS
> updates could be streamed out on regular updates
You can multicast the Super Bowl, because to a rather high rate of accuracy
you can assume that everybody who want
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Alan Buxey wrote:
> For the sake of security of all internet connected hosts - especially in this
> new era of even more IOT junk , security updates, firmware and new OS
> updates should be granted libre data rates so that users who keep their
> devices updated
For the sake of security of all internet connected hosts - especially in this
new era of even more IOT junk , security updates, firmware and new OS updates
should be granted libre data rates so that users who keep their devices updated
are not penalised.
as for carriers pipes...will, if multi
Ugh, I had to deal with this almost daily at $large_metered_us_carrier. We
have WiFi hotspots and USB modems and inevitably the customers who usually
use <2GB and have plans based on that usage got slapped with huge Windows
10 overages. Explaining that no, your "geebee" meter isn't broken,
Microsof
20 matches
Mail list logo
