hey,
If you are in the Video content delivery business using mcast then
these folks are one of the leaders. You can put multiple probes
and make sure your mcast coming off source is solid, through the
core router solid, and at the edge... http://www.ineoquest.com/
they are not cheap but wort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/Jan/16 09:31, joel jaeggli wrote:
> > > There are also of course variations on this. An an aggregation
router > may have quite limited FIB, e.g. enough for customer routes yet
still > have a full rib in it's control-plane, at which point it
On 1/25/16 11:06 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> My understanding is this was mostly legacy from devices that did not
> carry full Rib and fib. There were tricks to avoid ending up on these
> skinny devices if you wanted.
>
> Life in the core has changed a lot in recent years from 6500/7600 and
> foundry
On 27/01/16 06:30, Mike Hammett wrote:
Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm
fairly sure they're on the route servers.
Google (AS15169) should be present on route servers at all exchanges
they're present at that have them. Generally as missing cases are
no
On 26/Jan/16 22:22, Daniel Corbe wrote:
> Some exchanges (like Equinix) do publish information about who is on their
> route servers, but they only make that information available to other
> customers.
Some exchange points provide that information publicly as well.
Different strokes.
Mark.
On 25/Jan/16 16:41, Robert Jacobs wrote:
> If you are in the Video content delivery business using mcast then these
> folks are one of the leaders. You can put multiple probes and make sure your
> mcast coming off source is solid, through the core router solid, and at the
> edge... http:/
Someone actually sent me a list from Equinix. If it says MLPE next to the
IP address of the provider then I assume they are using the MLPE route
server, and if not I assume you have to reach out to peer with them. Does
that sound accurate?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Bryan Socha wrote:
> Ch
> Is there a way to browse a route server at
> certain exchanges, and see who is and is not on the route server?
Quite many ixp´s do so ... so you can verify yourself what is going on...
Typical offer of a looking glass:
You can see the sessions, you can see the amount of prefixes,
You can see th
While it was as an home-user level, I also experienced the same issues for
the past few days, however those warning haven't appeared today.
If you do accomplish clearing yourself from blacklist, may you please give
feedback as to how (apart from this list) alternatively contact them?
I do remember
Check out nl nog's the ring (they have a looking glass), routeviews or
ripe's RIS project (bgplay) being an interface to the data).You should
be able to find someone sending up bgp data to these projects that include
the route servers on different IX points.
Bryan Socha
Network Engineer
Digit
You have a couple of things to consider. Most exchanges have route servers.
Some folks peer with those and pretty much anyone can gain access to these
route servers. Not everyone peers with these however. In the large IXes it’s
typically the small to medium folks who are on the route servers.
Some exchanges run an open looking glass with BGP summary access, e.g.
DE-CIX Frankfurt route servers:
https://lg.de-cix.net/
Else you could also take a look in the common route registry databases.
Regards
Joerg
On 26 Jan 2016, at 21:09, Colton Conor wrote:
Is there a way to browse a route se
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who
>> is and is not on the route server?
>>
>
> Publicly? No.
>
> Best way is to peer with one and see wh
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who
> is and is not on the route server?
>
Publicly? No.
Best way is to peer with one and see what routes it’s giving you.
Some exchanges (like Equinix) do publish
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:08 PM, James Downs wrote:
>
> > On Jan 26, 2016, at 09:40, Adam Loveless
> wrote:
> >
> > Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address
> space
> > has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them
> now.
>
> Is that the captur
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> On Tue 2016-Jan-26 12:40:06 -0500, Adam Loveless
> wrote:
>
> Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space
>> has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now.
>>
>
> v6 or v4? We had
Who are you referring to David? Are you mentioning flexoptix? Is for are
are saying I can recode a fiberstore sfp using a flexoptics programmer?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:28 PM, David Lucey
wrote:
> They used to lock in, but optics have gotten so competitive that they
> aren't pushing it anymore
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 09:40, Adam Loveless wrote:
>
> Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space
> has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now.
Is that the capture that happens in front of certain websites? I had that
happen for two
Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who
is and is not on the route server?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> On Tue 2016-Jan-26 13:30:41 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I
On Tue 2016-Jan-26 12:40:06 -0500, Adam Loveless
wrote:
Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space
has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now.
v6 or v4? We had a round of issues with v6 traffic getting the CAPTCHA
treatment for
On Sun 2016-Jan-24 22:32:42 -0500, Ryan Gard wrote:
Hey,
Per chance if someone @ Netflix could reach me off list? Seems that as of
this weekend there's a number of our clients (residential internet) who are
unable to utilize Netflix directly, instead being presented with a message
advising the
Use cdnet...@netflix.com
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Ryan Gard wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Per chance if someone @ Netflix could reach me off list? Seems that as of
> this weekend there's a number of our
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hello folks!We have an issue with some multicast streams. For some reason
picture is very unstable in evening, during internet usage peak times. We have
had monitor our links and uplinks and there wasn't any oversubscribtion. I
looking for usefull
Any Google engineers that can contact me off list? Seems our address space
has been blacklisted by Google and we have to enter captchas for them now.
They used to lock in, but optics have gotten so competitive that they aren't
pushing it anymore. They have a list of optics they interop with, and will
give you an unlock code with your order.
Cheers,
David
---
Keys mashed on a very tiny keyboard.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 08:55, John Kinsella
If you are in the Video content delivery business using mcast then these folks
are one of the leaders. You can put multiple probes and make sure your mcast
coming off source is solid, through the core router solid, and at the edge...
http://www.ineoquest.com/ they are not cheap but worth ev
On Tue 2016-Jan-26 13:30:41 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm
fairly sure they're on the route servers.
...and have open peering policies with pretty low requirements.
https://peering.google.com/about/peering_policy.html
htt
Hey,
Per chance if someone @ Netflix could reach me off list? Seems that as of
this weekend there's a number of our clients (residential internet) who are
unable to utilize Netflix directly, instead being presented with a message
advising them they're using a VPN service... Have a feeling that our
Hi Lorell,
Here's ones that I used to use for DOCSIS 2 UBR's years ago. For the
remote query table, you will obviously need to turn on remote query.
remote query table:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.10.59.1.2.1
cable modem registrations:
.1.3.6.1.2.1.10.127.1.3.3.1
if you don't have remote query capabil
They are targeting a different market with cloud exchanges. Usually the direct
connect services are for hooking up your MPLS to the cloud provider. Many cloud
providers connect to their customers with RFC1918 addresses as well.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog
Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I'm
fairly sure they're on the route servers.
Other than driving additional revenue by needing to buy ports to both or
possible regulatory concerns, I'm not sure why these companies spin up an
exchange for every new fad that
Colton,
Sorry, hit send before I was done! You mentioned an enterprise, if that was the
case you may want to look at Equinix's Cloud Exchange. The Equinix IX is really
meant for like-minded Network operators and Content providers to exchange
routes on an exchange so that we don't require multipl
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Nick Ellermann wrote:
Colton,
We are a member on the Equinix IX. Maybe best for you to speak to an
Equinix SE on the topic, but there are two main connection methods. In
laymen's terms you can be a member on the switch and then build peering
relationships within any othe
Colton,
We are a member on the Equinix IX. Maybe best for you to speak to an Equinix SE
on the topic, but there are two main connection methods. In laymen's terms you
can be a member on the switch and then build peering relationships within any
other network that will have you. Meaning, you rea
> It appears that to route on the edge with multihop is viewed as novel.
might have been novel in 1990, not now. other adjectives apply, and not
nice ones
randy
> IXPs solve a different set of problems, namely how to interconnect with
> large numbers of third party organisations with low admin overhead.
and low port count
From an IX perspective HE is much more receptive to peering at an IX. Last I
knew cogent outright says no. In our Indianapolis market a ton of capacity
would be saved if Cogent would peer. I understand the reasoning, but having a
provider that is more willing to peer is a draw to the end user
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jeroen Wunnink
wrote:
> Flexopitix allows 3rd party vendor rebranding by buying credits for the
> branding box/account.
AFAIK you have to buy their transceivers, then you can use their
FlexBox to change the programming of the transceivers to be compatible
with $ve
38 matches
Mail list logo
