Yes Scott. It was on topic and genuine in the approach, but understand the
nuances around it. I did declare the interest in the second email when a more
detailed explainer was included with a request to take it offline. That felt
like I was stepping over the mark for the sake of pointing out t
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Scott Weeks wrote:
--
Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your
fabric/IX on X www.xx.com .
--
https://www.nanog.org/list
"5.Product marketing is prohibited"
It appears from
On 2016-07-12 03:25, Sean Donelan wrote:
> RFC791 was written during the internet's anti-standard era.
>
> We reject: kings, presidents and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and
> running code
Hi Sean,
Lovely quote and all, but... do you mean that when RFC791 was
drafted the IETF didn't iss
--
> Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your
fabric/IX on X www.xx.com .
--
https://www.nanog.org/list
"5.Product marketing is prohibited"
It appears from a web search that you are affiliated
On 12/Jul/16 17:21, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
>
> Having recently asked a datacenter about what providers were present
> in their facilities and receiving an answer similar to "Who would you
> like to be there?", I much prefer PeeringDB's model of ensuring data
> completeness and correctness.
Aww
* be...@slattery.net.au (Bevan Slattery) [Tue 12 Jul 2016, 15:33 CEST]:
Peeringdb provides a list of registered peers in a DC that has an IX.
Great for looking at where to peer.
PeeringDB lists many datacenters without any IXP. The difference
seems to be that PeeringDB data is provided by the
Taken care of, thanks!
On 7/11/2016 2:46 PM, Brian Rak wrote:
Is there anyone here that can put me in touch with a Comcast mail
server administrator? It seems that they've firewalled off some of
our IPv6 space, and I can't seem to find any contact information.
Interestingly, I can't even fi
Hi James,
I hear you. Massive fan of peeringdb and this isn't about replacing that
(in fact love to simply integrate).
Peeringdb provides a list of registered peers in a DC that has an IX.
Great for looking at where to peer.
Cloud Scene looks at all providers (4,000+) whether they are peering o
Hi James,
I hear you. Massive fan of peeringdb and this isn't about replacing that.
Peeringdb provides a list of registered peers in a DC that has an IX.
Great for looking at where to peer.
Cloud Scene looks at all providers (4,000+) whether they are peering or not
in any DC (4,800+ DC's) whet
On 12 July 2016 at 13:46, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> Great work. Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on
> Cloud Scene www.cloudscene.com . Provides visibility for people looking
> for DC's, providers and fabrics that just aren't limited to IX locations or
> peers.
>
> Cheers
Great work. Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on
Cloud Scene www.cloudscene.com . Provides visibility for people looking
for DC's, providers and fabrics that just aren't limited to IX locations or
peers.
Cheers
[b]
On 28 June 2016 at 18:49, Marty Strong via NANOG wro
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Thanks for identifying the source, I wish more people did this.
My nitpick is that RFC791 doesn't label MTU=68 as "standard";
it says (section 3.2, p.25):
RFC791 was written during the internet's anti-standard era.
We reject: kings, presidents a
12 matches
Mail list logo
