On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Sep 9, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Dan White wrote:
We're being caught up in some sort of peering dispute between Level 3 and
Google (in the Dallas area), and we've fielded several calls from larger
customers complaining of 40-50% packet loss (to 8.8.8.8) when
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > On Sep 9, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Dan White wrote:
> >
> > We're being caught up in some sort of peering dispute between Level 3 and
> > Google (in the Dallas area), and we've fielded several calls from larger
> > customers complaining of 40-50%
> On Sep 9, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Dan White wrote:
>
> We're being caught up in some sort of peering dispute between Level 3 and
> Google (in the Dallas area), and we've fielded several calls from larger
> customers complaining of 40-50% packet loss (to 8.8.8.8) when there appears
> to be no actual
We're being caught up in some sort of peering dispute between Level 3 and
Google (in the Dallas area), and we've fielded several calls from larger
customers complaining of 40-50% packet loss (to 8.8.8.8) when there appears
to be no actual service impacting loss.
We currently suggest customers use
Can you elaborate?
On Sep 9, 2016 2:54 PM, "Dan White" wrote:
> Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to
> customer facing pings?
>
> --
> Dan White
> BTC Broadband
> Network Admin Lead
> Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
> Fax 918.366.6610
On 2016-09-09 19:52, Dan White wrote:
Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to
customer facing pings?
PaaS (pong-as-a-service)?
Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to
customer facing pings?
--
Dan White
BTC Broadband
Network Admin Lead
Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000
Fax 918.366.6610email: dwh...@olp.net
http://www.btcbroadband.com
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.
vDOS — a “booter” service that has earned in excess of $600,000 over the
past two years helping customers coordinate more than 150,000 so-called
distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks designed to knock Web sites
offline — has been massively hacked, spilling secrets about tens of
thousands
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Shon Elliott wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Sorry for having to ask this, but I haven't been able to chase down anyone
> from Amazon. Can someone from Amazon who might be watching the list who deals
> with the Amazon Instant Video, FireTV, Music, and other streaming
On 09/08/2016 04:09 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
> With NAT I have a single entry/exit point to those infrastructure subnets
> which can be easily policed.
I have used NAT in IPv4 scenarios as an alternative for lack of routing
control in the return direction.
However, this does not mean that this
11 matches
Mail list logo
