Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)

2016-11-20 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: I need to verify some claims made by incumbents in Canada that VoLTE data travels on a totally separate channel between the phone and the antenna. Typically it travels on another "bearer" compared to Internet traffic.

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

2016-11-20 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Tested again from four different networks. Not working for me. Same in other web sites hosted by 1&1 (for example www.legalveritas.es). All their IPv6 web sites are broken, every time I need to access their web sites, need to disable IPv6, I know how to do that, but regular folks not. tbit

Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)

2016-11-20 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > Would DOCSIS be the same as FTTH, with the cableco voice service riding > isnide the same DOCSIS bandwidth but with pre-allocated bandwidth, or do > they allocate separate NTSC channels with a totally separate data pipe ? DOCSIS has a possibility

Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)

2016-11-20 Thread Jean-Francois Mezei
I need to verify some claims made by incumbents in Canada that VoLTE data travels on a totally separate channel between the phone and the antenna. Does anyone have links to relevant VoLTE documentation that would provide how VoLTE is provisioned ? I was under the impression that it was more of

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

2016-11-20 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 11:26 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > And the advertised MSS was what? On my box I'm seeing 1220 for > IPv6 compared with 1460 for IPv4. 1220 shouldn't see PMTU problems. --> 2001:8d8:100f:f000::2d5 syn w/ mss 1440 <--

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

2016-11-20 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <1479686835.13553.4.ca...@ns.five-ten-sg.com>, Carl Byington writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 10:51 +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > For example, you will not get this working if you have a lower MTU > > than 1.500, which is

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

2016-11-20 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 10:51 +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > For example, you will not get this working if you have a lower MTU > than 1.500, which is quite normal, not just for tunnels, but also > because the PPP/others encapsulation in many

Re: list scrap by long time participant?

2016-11-20 Thread Job Snijders
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:19:35PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote: > --- Begin forwarded message: > > Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, > > . > Contact me for further details. > - > > Did anyone get this? I hesitate to think a long time NANOG >

list scrap by long time participant?

2016-11-20 Thread Scott Weeks
--- Begin forwarded message: Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, We have three of the top five transit providers in our portfolio: Telia, Cogent, and GTT. Also NTT, Telecom Italia, and PCCW. Telia pricing is attractive given the quality of the product. Contact me for further details.

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

2016-11-20 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Somebody pointed to me that even happy eyeballs will not fall back to IPv4 when PMTUD is blocked … This is a big issue, many folks are deploying IPv6 web sites, and not double-checking this. Actually, this is VERY BIG issue with all the 1&1 sites. I tried to contact them many times for more