i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell
but with valerie home any minute i must stop
will come back though
> On Jun 16, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are
When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are
these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through "normal
peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
Anyone aware of
Anyone aware of different traffic behavior depending if the target
goes through normal peering than through an exchanges google exists in?
We're facing a weird issue where the same GCLD Instance can upload
up to 200Mbps (Ref 1) if the target path goes through, lets say TorIX,
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
MENOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
the discussion about the external spam kinda exceeds the volume of the spam
itself. just my 2 cents.
just block, delete, continue life
- Technical Maintenance Engineer Parkstad Support BV- Maintainer DroneBL-
Peplink Certified Engineer
Mail list logo