Re: Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?

What a terrific idea..., simple & useful El 29/8/17 a las 1:41 p.m., Michael Still escribió: > I agree a max-prefix outbound could potentially be useful and would > hopefully not be too terribly difficult to implement for most vendors. > > Perhaps RFC4486 would need to be updated to reflect this

I-65 Alabama

Is anyone aware of any non-AT, non-Charter fiber routes going up I-65 in Alabama? Most that even go close to there seem to be over on 231. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com

Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?

Good use-case for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out and snapshot auditing before and after changes. Leak didn't last long but it could have been caught within milliseconds verses minutes via oh sh** alarms. --Tim On 8/29/17, 6:46 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Randy

RE: Hurricane Harvey - Network Status (FCC)

High Water and loss of power has been biggest issue. Fiber is water proof just need to power to light it up. To many roads are blocked to even try and get generators dispatched. Link to power grid and link to flood gauges http://gis.centerpointenergy.com/outagetracker/

Re: Hurricane Harvey - Network Status (FCC)

How badly was terrestrial telecom infrastructure affected? - R. From: NANOG on behalf of Timothy Sesow Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 12:08 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Hurricane Harvey - Network Status

Re: Cogent BCP-38

Hi, > Op 29 aug. 2017, om 15:29 heeft Rob Evans het > volgende geschreven: > >> Well, if you are using public IP addresses for infra you are violating your >> RIR’s policy more than likely. > > [Citation needed.] :) I am pretty confident that I know those policies