The situation reports from Puerto Rico seems to be getting passed
through public relations, so I'll try to add some context.
Public Safety
Primary Public Safety Answering Point (9-1-1) center generator
ran out of diesel fuel. Switched to alternate PSAP.
San Juan Police Department
On 09/26/17 06:29, marcel.duregards--- via NANOG wrote:
Dear Nanoger,
Anyone have an advice on CPE which can support the following features,
please:
I've been building cpe devices using various models from
http://www.lannerinc.com.
I populate with Debian linux:. I use pxeboot to autoboot
Hello.
We are experiencing traffic issues between AT and twtelecom between SF and LA
(5-7% dropped and out-of-order packets, increased latency RTT).
Issue occurs only during business hours pacific time. We are on the AT
enterprise side of the equation.
My personal guess is oversubscribed
Its up to you and how you want to manage your sessions. Some networks
require it, some prefer it but do not require it, and others do not want to
use it at all.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington <
craigwashingto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or
Sean, thank you for all the excellent updates you have been providing.
Status.pr is disturbing since there is no context to the stats offered on this
page. 49% of supermarkets may be open, but with nothing on their shelves. And
11k refugees? Who are they trying to kid with a number like that.
Hi all,
It appears one of our fellow network operators ran into some issues
earlier today, probably due to the turn-up of a some new circuits for
customers. In order to expedite the restoration I'm sharing the below
information.
I recommend any peering partners that saw BGP sessions go down with
Hey everyone,
Don't suppose if anyone on this list knows if RFC 4638 (baby jumbos, aka
MTU of 1508) or IPoE is supported on CenturyLink VDSL2 connections?
I know IPoE is supported on connections with their TV service option.
Would be nice to either get PPPoE out of the picture or have a
Almost all good and popular peering points utilize MAC locks on ports for
all peers. (With few exceptions. ) To hijack a bgp session one would need
not only a port on the peering network but a MAC address registered with
the peering network - or their packets won't transverse the port through
the
Hi Craig,
It may be simplest to use GTSM https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5082
Kind regards,
Job
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at
> public
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
MD5 on BGP Considered Harmful
--
TTFN,
patrick
Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
> On Sep 29, 2017, at 13:41, craig washington
> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at
>
Hello all,
Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at
public exchange locations.
Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do
you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
Ive seem some use it and some not
Career federal employees are taught to write situation reports in very
boring language with just the facts known. Nevertheless, after
reading lots of situation reports, you start to notice when the
bubureaucratic language changes. Perhaps the most famous was the
commander of Apollo 13's report
If one uses Caltrain and has luggage there is a luggage car with racks.
Also no wifi on Caltrain but wifi is available on Bart and the VTA (light rail
and express buses). The car with the assistance ramp has a washroom, the rest
do not.
As a long time commuter (Gilroy to SF) I do recommend
Do they publicly have any more info on this?
I thought CloudFlare didn’t consider doing that because of their vast coverage
and peering arrangements provided by their PoPs.
Regards,
Marco Slater
> On 29 Sep 2017, at 14:38,
> wrote:
I live in the next block along from the Fairmont. For people who want to use
CalTrain then there is the Downtown Area Shuttle (DASH) that runs from Diridon
around the downtown area and will pass by the Fairmont on San Fernando St. The
shuttle is timed to connect with CalTrain in both directions
> On Sep 29, 2017, at 1:07 AM, Julien Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
>> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
>> shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
>> your way south.
>
>
I think that Cloudflare has a caching solution, but I think they have strict
requirements towards the isp in order to install them on their premises.
Best Regards,
Michalis Bersimis
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
Sent: Thursday,
Google SFO SJC
From: Julien Goodwin
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?
On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are
On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
> shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
> your way south.
I'm arriving on Sunday morning, so have plenty of time, and will take
Caltrain down (BART
20 matches
Mail list logo