On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > I believe we've seen bogus low AS number announcements a few times
> > before, and they've usually been caused by attemts to configure
> > AS path prepending without understanding and/or reading the docs.
> >
> > Someone might have wrongly a
> I believe we've seen bogus low AS number announcements a few times
> before, and they've usually been caused by attemts to configure
> AS path prepending without understanding and/or reading the docs.
>
> Someone might have wrongly assumed that
>
>set as-path prepend 133711 133711
>
> coul
Dear Jason,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:17:47PM -0400, Jason S. Cash wrote:
> Yes, ASN2 sees about 1-4 configuration related "rogue" announcements
> per month. What is going on right now does not appear to be a small
> misconfiguration.
>
> The only route we (University of Delaware) are annou
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:13:47 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork
To: Anurag Bhatia
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: IPv4 and IPv6 hijacking by AS 6
Anurag Bhatia writes:
Similar for AS2.
I believe we've seen bogus low AS number annou
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-s
Unfortunately, that's how it's done in route policy on XR, so people bouncing
between flavors can easily make that mistake.
On 4/13/18, 4:15 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Bjørn Mork" wrote:
Anurag Bhatia writes:
> Similar for AS2.
I believe we've seen bogus low AS number anno
> On Apr 13, 2018, at 12:27 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> Maybe AS6 is used internally by the next AS on the path?
I've definitely seen (and sadly, interacted with) operators that solved their
"why doesn't non-meshed iBGP do what I'm expecting" problems by simply using
different low-numbered
Anurag Bhatia writes:
> Similar for AS2.
I believe we've seen bogus low AS number announcements a few times
before, and they've usually been caused by attemts to configure
AS path prepending without understanding and/or reading the docs.
Someone might have wrongly assumed that
set as-path p
8 matches
Mail list logo