Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

I don't. I have better things to do than babysit various accounts I've signed up over the years. Just because someone signs up for an account and forgets about it is not a good enough reason to have my information DESTROYED WITHOUT MY PERMISSION if I do happen to be busy that week to sign in

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On 17 May 2018 at 08:03, Niels Bakker

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On May 17, 2018 at 10:29 niels=na...@bakker.net (Niels Bakker) wrote: > We cannot escape UDRP but at least we now have a say in what we are > forced to publish about ourselves. Just curious, what does UDRP have to do with any of this? UDRP is an ICANN process which allows someone who

Re: Equinix Fire Alarm - IBX was Evacuated

Appears to have just been a drill. They let us all back in within 15 mins. -Matt On Thu, May 17, 2018, 14:26 Luke Guillory wrote: > Just got this. > > > > > Dear Equinix Customer, > > IBX(s): DA6 > IBX Address: 1950 North Stemmons Freeway Suites 2049 & 3050 Dallas,

Equinix Fire Alarm - IBX was Evacuated

Just got this. Dear Equinix Customer, IBX(s): DA6 IBX Address: 1950 North Stemmons Freeway Suites 2049 & 3050 Dallas, TX 75207 Ticket#: 5-152980676699 Date and Time of Occurrence: 17-MAY-2018 14:04 Site Local Time INCIDENT SUMMARY: Fire Alarm - IBX was Evacuated INCIDENT DESCRIPTION:

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Hi, > Dne 17/05/2018 v 15:03 Niels Bakker napsal(a): >> * na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 17 May 2018, 14:44 CEST]: >>> Agreed. This is garbage, un-needed legislation. >> >> Disagreed. These are great and necessary regulations.> >> I'm loving the flood of convoluted unsubscribe notices

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

In a related note, I received a note from my registrar this morning telling me that, per current ICANN rules, I need to verify all the personal identifying information for the domains I control. 1. I checked WHOIS for all my domains, and they point to the proxy service that my registrar

Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Dne 17/05/2018 v 15:03 Niels Bakker napsal(a): > * na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 17 May 2018, 14:44 CEST]: >> Agreed. This is garbage, un-needed legislation. > > Disagreed.  These are great and necessary regulations.> > I'm loving the flood of convoluted unsubscribe notices this month from

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

* br...@ampr.org (Brian Kantor) [Thu 17 May 2018, 16:23 CEST]: An article in The Register on the current status of Whois and the GDPR. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/16/whois_privacy_shambles/ My registrar already does all the things listed in this article that registrars supposedly

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

You shouldn't need to contact your ISP on the lowered BGP timers as BGP should establish based on the lowest value. That said, they may have a value limit where anything lower than that, is set at your own risk. You can look at running BFD over the BGP session as well. Technically it has

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

On Thu 2018-May-17 10:49:37 -0400, Adam Kajtar wrote: Thomas, Thanks for the info. This is probably why my multipath configuration wasn't working as I thought it would. I will give this a test run also. Mike, Interesting thought. This would mean rpf-check

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Thomas, Thanks for the info. This is probably why my multipath configuration wasn't working as I thought it would. I will give this a test run also. Mike, Interesting thought. This would mean rpf-check wouldn't work on my outside interfaces. Good to know. On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:55 AM Mike

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

An article in The Register on the current status of Whois and the GDPR. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/16/whois_privacy_shambles/

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

I often question why\how people build networks the way they do. There's some industry hard-on with having a few ginormous routers instead of many smaller ones. I've learned that when building Internet Exchanges, the number of networks that don't have BGP edge routers in major markets where they

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 17 May 2018, 14:44 CEST]: Agreed. This is garbage, un-needed legislation. Disagreed. These are great and necessary regulations. I'm loving the flood of convoluted unsubscribe notices this month from companies that had stored PII for no reason.

Re: internet - sparkle

IXes are generally a far better use of eyeball resources than additional transit networks. Obviously, there are some edge exceptions. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From:

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Just be aware of the impact a default route can have on your infrastructure, such as uRPF no longer works as expected as everything has a valid route. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Agreed. This is garbage, un-needed legislation. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Owen DeLong" To: b...@theworld.com Cc: "Constantine A. Murenin"

Re: BGP Optimizers (Was: Validating possible BGP MITM attack)

Dear Francois, On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:14:19AM +, Francois Devienne wrote: > The examples you mention confirm the issues are mainly due to poorly > configured networks where routes are leaked out although they > shouldn’t be. Adequate routers are able to filter out prefixes based > on

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

* o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) [Thu 17 May 2018, 03:19 CEST]: At this point if I were a registrar or registry doing business in such a way as to be subject to gdpr, I’d seriously consider spinning up a subsidiary only for that purpose and leave it with minimal revenues and nothing to collect