Re: Subsea availability

yup that one too, i have noticed. the issue with this one, it does not load for me unless i accept some scripts to load. I will speak to Greg about how to get around it and i am already using his database. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Reid Fishler wrote: > Not to

Re: Subsea availability

Not interactive but cool animation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlAJJI-qG2k On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:37 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > yeah, I know and already reached out to my friends at Telegeography on how > to make www.submarinecablemap.com interactive > > On Mon, May

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:03 PM Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Mind pointing out where in the GDPR that it directly relates to these > types of mail services ? > > > Like most regulations, it doesn’t call out a specific thing like email or social networking sites or ecommerce.

Re: Subsea availability

yeah, I know and already reached out to my friends at Telegeography on how to make www.submarinecablemap.com interactive On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Martin Hepworth wrote: > I'll put this as a starter > > http://submarine-cable-map-2018.telegeography.com/ > > There's

Re: Subsea availability

I'll put this as a starter http://submarine-cable-map-2018.telegeography.com/ There's probably better by now Martin On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 06:13, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Hello there, > > I am working on a masters project idea to create an interactive map of the > world’s

Subsea availability

Hello there, I am working on a masters project idea to create an interactive map of the world’s subsea cables (cls to cla without local loops from cls to dc) I would like to know if anyone have worked with something like this in the past, and whether you think it would be cool to have a map

Telecommunications Outage Report: Northern California Firestorm 2017

A report on the telecommunications outages that affected Mendocino, Napa and Sonoma Counties in the wake of the devastating fires of 2017. http://www.mendocinobroadband.org/wp-content/uploads/1.-NBNCBC-Telecommunications-Outage-Report-2017-Firestorm.pdf [...] Results show that in the

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Mind pointing out where in the GDPR that it directly relates to these types of mail services ? > On May 21, 2018, at 20:07, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM Fletcher Kittredge wrote: > >> What about my right to not have this

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

9010 and 7609 Small? Aaron > On May 19, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Ben Cannon wrote: > > Isn’t that the ASR9010? (And before that 7609?) > > -Ben > >>> On May 18, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Tom Hill wrote: >>> >>> On 17/05/18 14:24, Mike Hammett wrote: >>> There's

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM Fletcher Kittredge wrote: > What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG? > What about the likely truth that if anyone from Europe mails the list, then every mail server operator with subscribers to the list must follow the GDPR Article

Re: Segment Routing

Matt, Just to clarify, Are you asking for SR and LDP interop or SR over LDP? Two different things. Thanks Dip On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:11 AM, Matt Geary wrote: > Hello maillist anyone had any experience with segment routing and its > performance over LDP? We are

Re: AT mobile intercepting TCP sockets?

Oh, I'm sure that'll never be abused by any hostile nation-state-owned monopoly telecom that likes to block/ban/MITM traffic, ever! On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Ca By wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:11 PM wrote: > > > IME ATT has intercepted

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:06:27 -0400, Fletcher Kittredge said: > What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG? procmail is your friend. pgpSkSM4c3_8E.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: AT mobile intercepting TCP sockets?

The short answer is, yes. This is a strong argument in favor of three things: a) Redirect all http trafifc on webservers you control to https , such as the following apache2 configuration file snippet for a virtualhost RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{SERVER_NAME} =domainname.com [OR] RewriteCond

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

If this is a know issue and has happened before and point to point circuits aren’t effected you always have the opportunity to diversify your own network and get private lines back to Miami, Jax, Atlanta or Dallas to create your own diversity don’t you? Robert DeVita Managing Director

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

If of use, last Monday I recorded and posted video of Jonathan Zuck's briefing to NARALO on ICANN's interim plan . > ​https://youtu.be/9WVI4aFg0Lc​ -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Ask if they will configure BFD for you. I’ve not found many transit providers that will, but it’s worth a shot and it will lower failure detection to circa 1 second. > On 16 May 2018, at 17:49, Adam Kajtar wrote: > > I could use static routes but I noticed since I

PlayStation Network Contact

Anybody have a contact that can help me with a prefix that is blocked from access to PlayStation Network? Nathan Gerencser, Network Engineer MetaLINK Technologies * 417 Wayne Ave * Defiance, OH 43512 office 419.990.0352 * cell 419.438.6356

Segment Routing

Hello maillist anyone had any experience with segment routing and its performance over LDP? We are evaluating the option to move to SR over LDP so we can label switch across our Nexus L3 switching environment. Thanks Packet Plumber

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

On 17/05/2018 19:03, Zbyněk Pospíchal wrote: > Dne 17/05/2018 v 18:14 Sander Steffann napsal(a): >> Hi, >> >> But this regulation increases essential liberty for individuals, so I don't >> understand your argument... > No, it don't. It has two aspects: > > [...] Very well said. -- Mark Rousell

Writing a Book about Open Networking and Dis-aggregation

Hi, Is anyone interested in working on a book that covers topics like: ``` . Network Operating System types. . Classic vs Open Networking. . Open Networking and SDN. . Forwarding Chips. . The new stack. . Disaggregation. . Automation. . Telemetry. ``` I'm thinking of covering the reasons why

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

To answer your specific question - In the regions we use 3356 (NYC and SFO/Bay Area) 3356 have been solid. I’d even say they have less issues than the other usual tier 1 providers... for example 1299 had a hell of a week last week around SFO was 3356 was stable. Can’t comment on what I’d say are

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG? On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Zbyněk Pospíchal wrote: > Dne 17/05/2018 v 18:14 Sander Steffann napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > But this regulation increases essential liberty for individuals, so I > don't understand your

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

The privacy implications that WHOIS had for domain name registrants was not only acknowledged by Europe. For a long time we were in a battle to get minimum privacy for domain registrants and the privacy proxy services provided some sort of relief. But the intellectual property interest with the

Re: BGP Optimizers (Was: Validating possible BGP MITM attack)

Hi Job, I believe your disclaimer makes a lot of sense. From our perspective using more specifics is one of the options to make BGP follow the optimized path instead of the « natural » path. We used to be doing more specifics because with the same prefix being announced, we were simply not

AS 205869 - BGP hijacking source

I am sending this notification as I have become aware that 205869 appears to be performing BGP hijacking and spoofing AS paths as well. Impacted organizations may wish to contact the upstream providers of this ASN. Mack McBride Contractor The contents of this message are my own and are not the

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

Isn’t that the ASR9010? (And before that 7609?) -Ben > On May 18, 2018, at 4:20 AM, Tom Hill wrote: > >> On 17/05/18 14:24, Mike Hammett wrote: >> There's some industry hard-on with having a few ginormous routers instead of >> many smaller ones. > > "Industry hard-on",

Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok

While it goes without saying that you need the same (can be 5!) number of links to each router in a multichassis LAG, what isn’t so obvious are things like port groups etc. If you have an oversubscribed platform, you might need to look at running each wire in a LAG to different port groups,

Verizon/UUNET AS701 blocking Tor "directory" server (IPv4 86.59.21.38)

Hi nanog mailing list, Keep in mind that I am not a practicing network engineer, although I do have interest and knowledge on networking topics. I do not work for Verizon. I subscribe to Verizon FiOS, but not Verizon Wireless or Verizon's enterprise services. The Tor "directory" server with

Re: AT mobile intercepting TCP sockets?

IME ATT has intercepted virtually everything on mobile (this is on a hotspot) - If I curl a HTTP vs HTTPS site, I get a different IP on each (one is obviously a shared web proxy); if I download images, they won't match md5-wise with the original version, etc. I have trouble connecting to VPNs

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

--- joe...@bogus.com wrote: From: joel jaeggli alcatel/nokia 7750 (L3's newer PE platform) is large but not outlandish and they've been deployed for a couple years. -- More than a couple... I was using them for MPLS over 10 years

Re: AT mobile intercepting TCP sockets?

> On May 21, 2018, at 3:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT > mobile devices this weekend. The website worked for everybody not on > AT mobile, and AT mobile users could access other sites; the problem > was just

AT mobile intercepting TCP sockets?

I ran into an odd issue with access to a website I manage from AT mobile devices this weekend. The website worked for everybody not on AT mobile, and AT mobile users could access other sites; the problem was just this combination. Android and iOS phones, as well as a Linux system tethered to an

Re: Curiosity about AS3356 L3/CenturyLink network resiliency (in general)

I would go as far as to say that Tier 1 is a derogatory designation, but I have a beef with Cogent because they're expecting otherwise Tier 1 IPv6 ISP Hurricane Electric to bow to the altar of Cogent. On 05/20/2018 15:19, Mark Tinka wrote: On 20/May/18 09:16, Baldur Norddahl wrote: The

Need AT / Ameritech DNS contact

Every other path at filing a bug has failed me... If there is someone here with control over ameritech.net's name servers, can you reach out to me please? -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI