Re: GDPR outside Europe, was Whois vs GDPR, latest news

In article <0bb31bbb-388d-4832-85dd-30c01c187...@jeffmurphy.org> you write: >There’s speculation that enforcement could occur via the FTC Privacy Shield >program. Privacy Shield is entirely optional. Joining it requires a lot of paperwork and a substantial administrative fee. If you don't do

Re: SD-WAN Solutions

On 5/24/18 12:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: --- sab...@auxes.is wrote: From: "Sabina M." Additionally, is anyone familiar with what RFC Alcatel/Nokia is implementing for the VXLAN part of the solution? It looks a bit non-standard but I can't find any clear documentation

Re: SD-WAN Solutions

--- sab...@auxes.is wrote: From: "Sabina M." Additionally, is anyone familiar with what RFC Alcatel/Nokia is implementing for the VXLAN part of the solution? It looks a bit non-standard but I can't find any clear documentation regarding this anywhere

Bezeq Internet (IL) around?

Hi Bezeq people, I hope you're subscribed here, I could use your immediate help, probably leading to a contract... Yours, Elmar.

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Anne, While I was re-reading some of the emails last night I realized that I mischaracterized your description here, *"You may accuse me of being a lawyer here (and rightly so :-) ), but "in", as in "in the Union" (which is the actual language) is very much open to interpretation. In a judicial

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

> On May 23, 2018, at 7:18 PM, K. Scott Helms wrote: > > Anything that can tie back to an individual data subject is PII, that means > email addresses, names in combination with addresses or phone numbers, finger > prints, or even insufficiently abstracted internal ID

SD-WAN Solutions

Has anyone worked with Nuage from around here? Additionally, is anyone familiar with what RFC Alcatel/Nokia is implementing for the VXLAN part of the solution? It looks a bit non-standard but I can't find any clear documentation regarding this anywhere Cheers, S.

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

There’s speculation that enforcement could occur via the FTC Privacy Shield program. > On May 23, 2018, at 7:38 PM, John Levine wrote: > >> No, but in the absence of a law that specifically bars the courts from >> doing so the will under current reciprocal treaty arrangements.

RE: Geolocation issue with a twist

Send them an email at the listed email address. Geolocation is always a pain. It can take months to get it straight. Mack Contractor -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+c-mack.mcbride=charter@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Clay Stewart Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 8:50

RE: BGP Battleships

MikroTik Official Response: Cisco informed us on May 22nd of 2018, that a malicious tool was found on several manufacturer devices, including three devices made by MikroTik. We are highly certain that this malware was installed on these devices through a vulnerability in MikroTik RouterOS

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Yep, feature naming in JunOS... In fact I meant «Provider Edge Link Protection», which is only for VPN (and Labeled Unicast), and that applies here (eBGP paths are protected using iBGP paths). > Le 24 mai 2018 à 13:39, Vincent Bernat a écrit : > > ❦ 24 mai 2018 12:36 +0200,

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

❦ 24 mai 2018 12:36 +0200, Olivier Benghozi  : > I wonder if this convergence time issue wouldn't be a typical mission for > «BGP PIC Edge for MPLS Layer 3 VPNs». > But it would be necessary to migrate the DFZ to a VPN MPLS (and > configure composite nexthop and BGP

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

I wonder if this convergence time issue wouldn't be a typical mission for «BGP PIC Edge for MPLS Layer 3 VPNs». But it would be necessary to migrate the DFZ to a VPN MPLS (and configure composite nexthop and BGP PIC / «Provider Edge Link Protection»). > Le 24 mai 2018 à 09:20, Vincent Bernat

Re: BGP Battleships

So the moral of the story is... "former Level(3)" must step into the bar and have a beer with the rest of us :-)? Mark. On 23/May/18 22:53, Scott Weeks wrote: > > I saw the below on SWINOG and thought it might add > some fun in the middle of all this General Data > Protection Regulation

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Hey! This feature is already enabled on MX with MPC cards. -- Make it right before you make it faster. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) ――― Original Message ――― From: Adam Kajtar Sent: 23 mai 2018 23:21 -0400 Subject: