On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:19 PM Roy Hockett wrote:
> Does anyone have a bookmark for a looking glass server for Verizon/UUnet
> (AS701)?
>
>
don't think there's really ever been one (there was a web-based lookup ...
based on not-real-time data) but I believe that's gone.
how about their routeview
Does anyone have a bookmark for a looking glass server for Verizon/UUnet
(AS701)?
If someone from Verizon/UUnet noc can contact me offline, that would also be
helpful.
Hoping to see if an network engineer from fitbit is on list. Our customers
are having trouble logging into your app on our network. Perhaps an IP
filtering/routing issue.
Thanks
>
>
> Internet Vulnerability Takes Down Google
> https://blog.thousandeyes.com/internet-vulnerability-takes-down-google/
>
>
I think this was actually just: "neighbor leaked routes beyond where they
should have"
which means, of course, that 'transit provider is not filtering their
customer'.
On 05/11/2018 10:54, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Harley H
>
>> Curious to hear others' thoughts on this.
>> https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=mca
>>
>> This paper presents the view that several BGP hijacks performed by China
>> Telecom had malicious intent. The
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 16:27, Alain Hebert wrote:
> For those that got involved in fixing a network that goes down due to
> OSPF spoofed packets... (Before OSPFv2|3)
> + Security for IS-IS
Do you know connected host can't talk ISIS to you?
ISIS is false security. In modern platforms O
David,
I sent your note to a person at Oracle that should be able to dig into it.
Cheers,
~ Matt Vernhout
http://www.emailkarma.net
Twitter: @emailkarma
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 2:48 PM David Shaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I could really use some help reaching someone at Oracle for a spam problem
> c
Hi,
For those that got involved in fixing a network that goes down due
to OSPF spoofed packets... (Before OSPFv2|3)
+ Security for IS-IS
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 12:37, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Main reasons:
> - Doesn't run over IP.
Why is this upside? I've seen on two platforms (7600, MX) ISIS punted
on routers running ISIS without interface having ISIS. With no
ability to limit it, so any connected interface can DoS device with
t
John Von Essen writes:
> I recently go a Linksys home wifi router, by default it enables ipv6
> on the LAN. If there is no native IPv6 on the WAN side (which is my
> case since FiOS doesnt do v6 yet) the Linksys defaults to a v6 tunnel.
Could this be a 6RD tunnel requested by your ISP using DHCP
On 13/Nov/18 07:52, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
>
> I was of the impression that there was a draft or similar for
> single-topology (IPv4+IPv6) OSPF. Did anything ever come of that?
Multiple Address Families in OSPFv3.
But NLRI is conveyed over IPv6, even for IPv4. First saw it in Junos 9,
way
On 12/Nov/18 20:34, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>
> Are you doing TCP MSS adjust/clamping? If you don't, try that and see
> if it helps. This might be a PMTUD issue.
>
> Otherwise if possible, try lowering the MTU sent in RA to the one you
> have on your tunnel (this depends on if this is ava
On 9/Nov/18 17:03, im wrote:
>
> 1. what is your backbone's IGP protocol?
IS-IS.
> 2. why you choose it?
Main reasons:
- Stringy, i.e., no "all must pay taxes to Area 0" decree.
- Integrated for IPv4 and IPv6.
- Doesn't run over IP.
Mark.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 05:54, Brandon Martin
wrote:
> I was of the impression that there was a draft or similar for
> single-topology (IPv4+IPv6) OSPF. Did anything ever come of that?
>
>
Juniper support IPv4 families ("realms") in OSPFv3.
Aled
14 matches
Mail list logo
