Re: Amazon Peering

2018-11-23 Thread Kaiser, Erich
Email all of their peering db contacts. On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:22 PM Darin Steffl wrote: > Hey all, > > Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established > with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times > this Sept and Nov with no

Amazon Peering

2018-11-23 Thread Darin Steffl
Hey all, Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times this Sept and Nov with no response. I sent to peer...@amazon.com and received one automated response back so I know they received my email

Re: RPKI publication

2018-11-23 Thread Jeff McAdams
On Fri, November 23, 2018 18:20, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:12 PM Jeff McAdams wrote: >> On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow < >> morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think there are 3 options: >>> ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) - >>>

Re: RPKI publication

2018-11-23 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:12 PM Jeff McAdams wrote: > > > On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow < > morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I think there are 3 options: > > ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) - > >https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator > > >

Re: RPKI publication

2018-11-23 Thread Jeff McAdams
On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow wrote: >I think there are 3 options: > ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) - >https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator > >https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3 > rpki.net validator - https://github.com/dragonresearch/rpki.net

Re: RPKI publication

2018-11-23 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:31 PM Alex Band wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > While I can’t offer you a solution today, I’m happy to tell you we’ve > recognised this particular use case and are working on a free, open source > solution. > > We're building a toolset that allows you to run a CA as a child of

Re: RPKI publication

2018-11-23 Thread Alex Band
Hi Jeff, While I can’t offer you a solution today, I’m happy to tell you we’ve recognised this particular use case and are working on a free, open source solution. We're building a toolset that allows you to run a CA as a child of one or multiple RIRs transparently and publish using your own

Re: Internet diameter?

2018-11-23 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:30 AM William Herrin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:58 PM Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > now, why does it matter? > > Good question! It matters because a little over two decades ago we had > some angst as equipment configured to emit a TTL of 32 stopped being >

Virtualization of everything

2018-11-23 Thread Mehmet Akcin
hey there, I provide some free vm/hosting for my friends and family but i am trying to shutdown this (or move from physical infra to virtual) and move everything to on premise virtual servers/kubernetes infastructure and have a front/back end which allows my friends and me to give them things

Weekly Routing Table Report

2018-11-23 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

RPKI publication

2018-11-23 Thread Jeff McAdams
OK, I'm trying to do the responsible thing and further the progress and deployment of RPKI. I feel like I have a pretty good handle on a path forward for doing validation and routing-policy based on ROA validation. However, I also feel like I'm really banging my head against a wall trying to set