Email all of their peering db contacts.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:22 PM Darin Steffl
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established
> with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times
> this Sept and Nov with no
Hey all,
Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established with
Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times this
Sept and Nov with no response.
I sent to peer...@amazon.com and received one automated response back so I
know they received my email
On Fri, November 23, 2018 18:20, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:12 PM Jeff McAdams wrote:
>> On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow <
>> morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think there are 3 options:
>>> ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) -
>>>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:12 PM Jeff McAdams wrote:
>
>
> On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow <
> morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I think there are 3 options:
> > ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) -
> >https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator
> >
>
On November 23, 2018 4:48:14 PM EST, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>I think there are 3 options:
> ripe validator v2 (potentially v3?) -
>https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator
>
>https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/rpki-validator-3
> rpki.net validator - https://github.com/dragonresearch/rpki.net
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:31 PM Alex Band wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> While I can’t offer you a solution today, I’m happy to tell you we’ve
> recognised this particular use case and are working on a free, open source
> solution.
>
> We're building a toolset that allows you to run a CA as a child of
Hi Jeff,
While I can’t offer you a solution today, I’m happy to tell you we’ve
recognised this particular use case and are working on a free, open source
solution.
We're building a toolset that allows you to run a CA as a child of one or
multiple RIRs transparently and publish using your own
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:30 AM William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 7:58 PM Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
> > now, why does it matter?
>
> Good question! It matters because a little over two decades ago we had
> some angst as equipment configured to emit a TTL of 32 stopped being
>
hey there,
I provide some free vm/hosting for my friends and family but i am trying to
shutdown this (or move from physical infra to virtual) and move everything
to on premise virtual servers/kubernetes infastructure and have a
front/back end which allows my friends and me to give them things
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
OK, I'm trying to do the responsible thing and further the progress and
deployment of RPKI. I feel like I have a pretty good handle on a path
forward for doing validation and routing-policy based on ROA validation.
However, I also feel like I'm really banging my head against a wall trying
to set
11 matches
Mail list logo