Neustar reporting, found after I sent the last email. Sorry
https://www.security.neustar/resources/tools/submit-to-global-ip-database
Luke
Ns
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 9, 2019, at 1:02 AM, Raja Sekhar Gullapalli
mailto:ra...@qti.qualcomm.com>> wrote:
Hi Anthony,
First one already tried
Maxmind
https://support.maxmind.com/geoip-data-correction-request/
Luke
Ns
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 9, 2019, at 1:02 AM, Raja Sekhar Gullapalli
mailto:ra...@qti.qualcomm.com>> wrote:
Hi Anthony,
First one already tried & but no response.
Who will help in getting geo updated which
Hi Raja,
If you have peering with them (AS15169), you can submit Geolocation data
via ISP Portal (https://isp.google.com/).
Regards,
Siyuan
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 3:03 PM Raja Sekhar Gullapalli <
ra...@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
>
>
> First one already tried & but no response.
>
Hi Anthony,
First one already tried & but no response.
Who will help in getting geo updated which shows 3 results as per your email.
Regards,
Raja
go/snitnet or go/itnet to request Network Services.
From: Delacruz, Anthony B
Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2019 1:28 AM
To: Raja Sekhar Gullapalli ;
On 8/Mar/19 13:18, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
>
> I haven't used Arista much at all really.
We are currently swapping out our Juniper EX4550's and EX4600's for
Arista's 7280SR switches, but this is purely for Layer 2 Ethernet
customer aggregation in the data centre.
The main issue we are
It can be blocked, FYI. Just... not as easily as it should be. On
Android, if you remove the CellBroadcastReceiver service, the phone no
longer listens for the alerts.
I rooted my phone specifically to be able to do this after the alerting
system rolled out in Canada. The test was bad
Once upon a time, Gerry Boudreaux said:
> For those who have GPS based NTP servers.
>
> https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Memorandum_on_GPS_2019.pdf
Note that the standard ntpd daemon has different code for different time
sources related to the GPS week roll-over. For
On 3/8/19 2:22 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/08/tech/emergency-alert-netflix-hulu-streaming/index.html
New York (CNN Business) The federal emergency alert program was
designed decades ago to interrupt your TV show or radio station and
warn about impending danger —
Software has bugs. If this happens to you (or anyone else), a hard power
reset of your mobile phone will clear up the problem.
I have not figured out what causes the repeating duplicate alerts. I've
asked FEMA and some engineers at a cellular carrier. It seems to be a
"known problem." But I
I’ve had issues with the amber alerts repeating or coming in from adjacent
states because “reasons”. When they repeat for days/hours ugh.
I do agree most people have devices. If there is a reasonable API method to
fetch them then great.
Sent from my iCar
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 7:51 PM,
NO!! But, I would not be opposed to some type of app on the boxes that support
it, one that can be dismissed or controlled by the user.
-Original message-
From:Sean Donelan
Sent:Fri 03-08-2019 04:22 pm
Subject:Should Netflix and Hulu give you emergency alerts?
To:nanog@nanog.org;
Absolutely, we need public emergency alerting. What we don't need is
every alert to go out mandatory highest level sound the klaxon, can't
be blocked, even when it's an "all clear" cancelling a previous
alert, and is being sent in the middle of the night.
That's the system that has been
Thanks!
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 17:02, Gerry Boudreaux wrote:
>
> For those who have GPS based NTP servers.
>
>
Canada made a lot of improvements with its alert implementation. It got
to see all the things the U.S. did wrong. Unfortuantely, Canada also
copied some wrong lessons from the the U.S. version.
South Korea probably has the most ludicrous emergency alerts in the world.
While improvements are
Just wait until your connected home speakers,
smart smoke detector, smart refrigerator, smart
tv, cell phone, IP streaming box, satellite
receiver, cable box, home security panel and your
Fitbit all go off warning you of the cancellation
of an Amber alert at 1:30am, because the good
folks
I don’t care if Aliens are invading or a blackhole is swallowing our sun, do
not... I repeat, do not interrupt me watching GoT’s on HBOGo!
-John
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 6:08 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:36 PM Matt Hoppes
>> wrote:
>> No. Please no.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:36 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> No. Please no. We need less regulation. Not more.
>
> VoIP started out the same way. Very simple to start offering voip. Worked
> well. Then the government got involved. Now it’s a mess of requirements,
>
Streaming is probably the least important thing someone could be doing.
A lot of places don't have adequate cell service.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Matt
What specific regulations do you feel were onerous and unnecessary with
respect to VOIP? (This is a legitimate question, not a trolling attempt. )
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:36 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> No. Please no. We need less regulation. Not more.
>
> VoIP
On 3/8/19 2:32 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
No. Please no. We need less regulation. Not more.
VoIP started out the same way. Very simple to start offering voip. Worked well.
Then the government got involved. Now it’s a mess of requirements, warnings and
reporting.
I was there developing service
No. Please no. We need less regulation. Not more.
VoIP started out the same way. Very simple to start offering voip. Worked well.
Then the government got involved. Now it’s a mess of requirements, warnings and
reporting.
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 5:22 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
>
Sean
I think the cellular emergency alert systems already in place have
satisfied this need or should be implemented before forcing streaming
services to alter their platforms. Plus they allow the user the ability to
disable them if they so choose. If they have the alerts disabled and miss
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/08/tech/emergency-alert-netflix-hulu-streaming/index.html
New York (CNN Business) The federal emergency alert program was designed
decades ago to interrupt your TV show or radio station and warn about
impending danger — from severe weather events to acts of war.
Replied off-list
-Matt
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:55 PM Christopher Smalling <
christopher.small...@neonova.net> wrote:
> Been having an issue with our public peering at an IX and have been
> getting the runaround from the NCC. AS 3595 (Global Net Access) has Zayo
> (AS 19092) as the contact.
>
>
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
Been having an issue with our public peering at an IX and have been getting
the runaround from the NCC. AS 3595 (Global Net Access) has Zayo (AS 19092)
as the contact.
If anyone on here can assist, can you contact me off-list, please?
--
[image: photo]
Christopher Smalling
NOC Support
This sometimes helps
https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip
you should probably also seek out getting geo updated on at least 3 different
ones you have 3 different results.
129.46.232.65
ip2location Raleigh NC
neustarbutler TN
maxmind Bridgewater NJ
From: NANOG
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:45 AM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> ICMP is nice in that it's totally protocol agnostic and doesn't require
> altering of packets in transit. It's a shame we can't reasonably rely
> on it being delivered.
>
Path MTU discovery is broken. It's the one place in TCP/IP where the
These boxes are available with 3 different FIB options currently..
7280R > 1M route
7280R2 (Jericho+) > 1.3M routes
7280R2K (Jericho+) > 2M routes
On top of the base FIB capabilities, EOS 4.21.3F adds FIB compression and
2-to-1 route compression features that give quite a bit of
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 7:07 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> It's been a while since then, and maybe there was a mistake on our
> side (at least within a perfectly academic context I must assume that
> there was, as there was no peer review — we were not in academy after
> all!), but I'm still
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 7:48 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Why do you think it would be expensive? It's cheaper than how ECMP is
> done for L3 keys, because you just read the flow label and not
> calculate any hash.
The most honest answer would be: I have no idea. That's just what I've
seen, rather
For those who have GPS based NTP servers.
https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Memorandum_on_GPS_2019.pdf
G
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:44 PM Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> My point is that it might be hard to find an affordable device that
> implements ECMP with v6 flow labels without a considerable performance
> impact. I would personally happy to see what others have tested in
> that regard.
Why do you
I can't comment on the direct comparison of the SLX9540, but we have 8x
7280SR deployed across our network (just migrated off all the Brocades we
had) and have had amazing success with them.
The number of informational or "show" commands isn't as extensive as some
of the others that have been
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 5:11 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Personally I'm surprised if ICMP volume is relevant based on our
> netflow data.
Legitimate ICMP traffic volume — oh, that's for sure.
But when it comes to attack volumes, it's a different story, and
current netflow measurements might be a bad
hey,
The Cloudflare blog
entry is 4 years old, if they had started actively pursuing proper fix
to the ECMP problem, the fix would be in production right about now.
You can find more recent overview at
https://blog.cloudflare.com/increasing-ipv6-mtu/
--
tarko
Hey Töma,
> NB: Cloudflare is basically busy filtering excessive amounts of spoofed ICMP
> packets containing whatever parameters and payload criminals could fit into,
> at virtually no cost for a customer. Your list might become somewhat short
> then.
I don't know what is the problem is
On 2019-03-08 14:45, Brandon Martin wrote:
> On 3/8/19 8:38 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>>> now for UDP, I don't know yet how does things like QUIC can be handled
>>> ...
>>
>> Unfortunately the magic answer you were hoping does not exist, what
>> they do is they just send smaller
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 7:27 AM Mark Andrews wrote:
> [..]
their inability to purchase
> devices that work with RFC compliant data streams.
>
To prove your point, you may want to provide a sample list of devices that
work that way, along with the benchmarks showing that those devices could
still
On 3/8/19 8:38 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
Hey,
now for UDP, I don't know yet how does things like QUIC can be handled ...
Unfortunately the magic answer you were hoping does not exist, what
they do is they just send smaller packets.
What we almost seem to be moving toward in this
Hey,
> now for UDP, I don't know yet how does things like QUIC can be handled ...
Unfortunately the magic answer you were hoping does not exist, what
they do is they just send smaller packets.
--
++ytti
hello,
Tore Anderson, you're right, clamping MSS is very efficient and very
certainly solves most of the problems.
now for UDP, I don't know yet how does things like QUIC can be handled ...
regards,
--
Jean-Daniel Pauget http://rezopole.net/
Folks,
If you follow the 6man working group of the IETF you may have seen a
bunch of emails on this topic, on a thread resulting from an IETF
Internet-Draft we published with Jan Žorž about "Reaction of Stateless
Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Renumbering Events" (Available at:
On 3/8/19 5:51 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 3/7/19 10:44 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
So how does the 7280SR-48C6 compare to the SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is how does the product
differ in software?
I just realized that the 7280SR is an Arista
On 3/7/19 10:44 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
So how does the 7280SR-48C6 compare to the SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is how does the product
differ in software?
I think a 9540 would compare more directly against a Nexus 9k series
device. They're
46 matches
Mail list logo
