Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-13 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <06570278-e1ad-4bb0-a9fc-11a77bed7...@arin.net>, John Curran wrote: >Even so, we at ARIN are in the midst of a Board-directed review of the RPKI >legal framework to see if any improvements can be made

Re: RPKI adoption

2019-08-13 Thread William Herrin
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:51 PM Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Just like to add kudos to John for being open and responsive on this list > and other lists to numerous issues and questions in regards to ARIN. Not > many CEOs are willing or able to respond as you do. > > Thanks for your time and

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-13 Thread William Herrin
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:25 PM John Curran wrote: > On 13 Aug 2019, at 11:03 PM, William Herrin wrote: > I signed no legal agreement either to register my legacy addresses or to do a whois lookup to check someone else's addresses. Just sayin’. > > If you instead used a command line interface

Re: RPKI adoption

2019-08-13 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 14/08/2019 06:24, John Curran wrote: When you did that Whois look up at the ARIN website, you did agree to terms of use for the Whois service which contains indemnification provisions and are legally enforceable. If you instead used a

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 13/08/2019 22:17, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Just as an observer to your long resource theft postings: - Do you attempt to contact directly the organization or person who have had their resource taken over? - Do they care or are they apathetic? - If the resource owner is no where to be

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-13 Thread John Curran
On 13 Aug 2019, at 11:03 PM, William Herrin mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 PM John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-13 Thread William Herrin
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 PM John Curran wrote: > On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at around a grand total > of 15% worldwide. Ah yes, here it is... > > https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/ > > I've asked many

RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-13 Thread John Curran
On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: ... The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at around a grand total of 15% worldwide. Ah yes, here it is... https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/ I've asked many people and many companies why

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Eric Kuhnke wrote: rfg>> 4) Filing a "fraud request" with ARIN is a serious step and one that rfg>could quite conceivably end up with the party filing such a formal rfg>report being on the business end of lawsuit, just for having filed rfg>such a report.

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Jared Mauch
I would try to isolate it with something like the RBFTC11 or similar if you can. They’re great boxes, but as with all things lightning you usually can’t protect from everything. I’ve had a lightning hit cause some major issues before at a tower site. You do what you can and keep suitable

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Matthew Crocker
Could you use a transceiver for the 1000Base-T? copper <-> fiber <-> copper that will create an ‘air gap’ on the data circuit. You still run the risk of a lightning strike entering through the transceiver power. You could filter that through a -48VDC power supply, rectifier/inverter pair.

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)

2019-08-13 Thread Stephen Satchell
On 8/13/19 3:10 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > With a global company, there's no such thing > as a local natural monopoly in play; how would > you assign oversight to a global entity? Which > "public" would be the ones being protected? > The city of Seattle, WA, where Amazon is > headquartered? The

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Eric Kuhnke
> 4) Filing a "fraud request" with ARIN is a serious step and one that could quite conceivably end up with the party filing such a formal report being on the business end of lawsuit, just for having filed such a report. What makes you think that the sort of persons who

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Marco Belmonte
For the record, there are just as many of us that appreciate your verbosity. On 8/13/2019 12:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message Ross Tajvar wrote: Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)

2019-08-13 Thread Matthew Petach
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 4:31 PM Stephen Satchell wrote: > On 8/9/19 4:03 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > > ...apparently Amazon has become a public utility > > now? > > > > I look forward with bemusement to the PUC > > tariff filings for AWS pricing. ^_^;; > > [...] > > And it wouldn't be the PUC,

RE: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Kevin McCormick
The university I worked at used ITW Linx surge arrestors for years, never had any issues. https://www.itwlinx.com/products/surgegate-modular-communications-surge-protectors/cat6-75z The model above will work with POE+, careful of their cheaper CAT5-POE and CAT6-POE models as they are not

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:11:00PM -0400, Ross Tajvar wrote: > Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than > writing a novel and sending it to NANOG, and doesn't require the latter... But if he didn't fully document his assertion(s), then he would be faced with a plethora

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message Ross Tajvar wrote: >Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than >writing a novel and sending it to NANOG, and doesn't require the latter... As noted in my immediately prior posting, ARIN's careful adjudication of this or any other possible case of fraud

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-13 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , John Curran wrote: >On 9 Aug 2019, at 4:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> ... >> Unfortunately, we cannot read too much into this change that was made >> to the block's public-facing WHOIS record. Neither the new WHOIS info >> nor even the old WHOIS info can be used to

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Nate Burke
You will want to check out these. https://mccowntech.wptstaging.space/product-category/surge-protectors/rack-mount-surge-protectors/ They are made to fit into the 1U APC Chassis PRM24. We rely on them heavily in the WISP Market. I've had equipment on a tower that was physically destroyed by

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Bill Woodcock
> The correct answer is use fiber. > Not sure I would bring an inter building link in copper onto an expensive > core switch though. Yeah. > Don't know of anything in higher density than "one port”. This on Amazon:

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Larry Smith
You might look at mccowntech.com, they make surge suppressors geared toward the wireless provider market which are pretty good. (not associated, we just use their products). -- Larry Smith lesm...@ecsis.net On Tue August 13 2019 13:22, Javier J wrote: > I'm working with a client site that has

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Blake Hudson
+1 on the Ubiquiti surge protectors specifically designed for PoE gear in mind (other brands like Cambium that are outdoor AP or camera oriented may work equally as well). I would also recommend continuing to isolate and protect as much as possible. For example, connecting your outdoor PoE

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Rob Pickering
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 19:23, Javier J wrote: > I'm working with a client site that has been hit twice, very close by > lightening. > > I did lots of electrical work/upgrades/grounding but now I want to focus > on protecting Ethernet connections between core switching/other devices > that can't

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Warren Kumari
This probably won't fully solve your problem, but I run a bunch of Ubiquiti access points and similar -- I suffered a number of lightning related outages, and then started using their TOUGHcable - https://www.ui.com/accessories/toughcable/ (don't forget to also get the special jacks / ends). Since

Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-13 Thread Javier J
I'm working with a client site that has been hit twice, very close by lightening. I did lots of electrical work/upgrades/grounding but now I want to focus on protecting Ethernet connections between core switching/other devices that can't be migrated to fiber optic. I was looking for surge