ARIN Fantasy WHOIS: NET-216-179-183-0-1

2019-08-14 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
As if to underscore the point I just tried to make about the fundamental unreliability of ARIN WHOIS records, I just stumbled onto this rather curious entity which was apparently given a sub-allocation of 216.179.183.0/24 beneath the 216.179.128.0/17 (Azuki, Inc.) block as of 2012-01-10: OrgName:

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-14 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 15/08/2019 06:16, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: - If the resource owner is no where to be found, why should we as a community care? I'm so glad you asked. Regardless, in -either- the case where no heir can be found -or- in the case where the rightful heir is either just too dumb or just too

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-14 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <20190810003820.gd2...@jima.tpb.net>, Niels Bakker wrote: >* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Sat 10 Aug 2019, 02:26 CEST]: >>As far as I am aware, no RIR makes any effort whatsoever to vet >>changes to WHOIS records, either for IP blocks or ASNs or ORG >>records. >

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

2019-08-14 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <4fcb73bf-224f-e011-f310-522193c86...@efes.iucc.ac.il>, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >Just as an observer to your long resource theft postings: >- Do you attempt to contact directly the organization or person who have >had their resource taken over? To the extent that I can spare the

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Another copper cable considered a "gold standard" for outdoor shielded + 9th ESD drain and ground wire, intended for long term rooftop and tower installation is Shireen. There's a variety of types. https://www.shireeninc.com/osc/cables/cat6 On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:30 PM Brandon Martin

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Brandon Martin
On 8/13/19 2:32 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: This probably won't fully solve your problem, but I run a bunch of Ubiquiti access points and similar -- I suffered a number of lightning related outages, and then started using their TOUGHcable - https://www.ui.com/accessories/toughcable/ While

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Eric Kuhnke
I would begin by referencing the grounding section here: https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/Lands_ROW_Motorola_R56_2005_manual.pdf Of utmost importance is that everything is bonded to the same potential. This means that if they have stuff on a roof, outdoor antennas or APs, whatever, it

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , John Curran wrote: >Alas, it’s not those who fail to properly configure RPKI that are likely to be >litigating, but rather their impacted customers and those customers' business >partners who all were unable to communicate due to no fault of their own. > >Such a matter will not be

Access to Level3 PoP?

2019-08-14 Thread Nicholas Warren
We are needing access into Level3/Centurylink's PoP at Monett Missouri to test our fiber. Does anyone have an email, phone number, or smoke signal we could use to get access to test fiber? Support is, sadly, not being very helpful. Nich Warren

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> There's obviously a disconnect where people aren't worried about indemnifying > Spamhaus for using their block list, but are worried about indemnifying ARIN > for > using the TAL. That would be because there is a rather substantial difference between publishing an IP address for which you

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, have seen and suffered from same. nearby strikes can cause enough surge to fry things. best solution - air-gaps where possible between devices (eg fibre to link switches), surge protectors on ethernet cables where needed (eg feeds from Access points) - and if the APs have external antennae

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Chris Knipe wrote: Think surge protectors will protect against strikes that is far away, and the residual surge it creates. A direct strike? Don't think there's anything that will really protect against that. https://imgur.com/a/dzTVw5a has been posted lately here in a

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread Valdis Klētnieks
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:07:49 -, John Curran said: > > But I suspect a lot of companies are reading it as: "If a spammer sues you > > for using > > a block list that prevents them from spamming your customers, you can't end > > up > > owing money to the block list maintainers. But if you

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Chris Knipe
Think surge protectors will protect against strikes that is far away, and the residual surge it creates. A direct strike? Don't think there's anything that will really protect against that. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 7:29 PM wrote: > > Are "surge protectors" really of much use against lightning?

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread bzs
Are "surge protectors" really of much use against lightning? I suspect not, other than minor inductions tho perhaps some are specially designed for lightning. I wouldn't assume, I'd want to see the word "lightning" in the specs. I once had a lightning strike (at Harvard Chemistry), probably

Re: new BGP hijack & visibility tool “BGPalerter”

2019-08-14 Thread Alarig Le Lay
Hi, You can build it yourself, see https://github.com/nttgin/BGPalerter#more-information-for-developers I think that the binaries are here for thoses that don’t want to install all the build-chain. -- Alarig On 14/08/2019 19:06, Ryan Hamel wrote: > Job, > > I appreciate the effort and the

Re: new BGP hijack & visibility tool “BGPalerter”

2019-08-14 Thread Ryan Hamel
Job, I appreciate the effort and the intent behind this project, but why should the community contribute to an open source project on GitHub that is mainly powered by a closed source binary? Ryan On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 10:55 AM Job Snijders wrote: > Dear NANOG, > > Recently NTT investigated

Re: new BGP hijack & visibility tool “BGPalerter”

2019-08-14 Thread Kushal R. via NANOG
This is great. Will be testing this later in the day. We like a lot of others were using BGPMon. — Kushal R. Executive Management | Host4Geeks Email: kusha...@h4g.co Skype: kush.raha Phone (Text/WhatsApp): +1-310-405-0010 [tel:+1-310-405-0010] (Global) / +91-8830547876 [tel:+91-8830547876]

Re: new BGP hijack & visibility tool “BGPalerter”

2019-08-14 Thread Eric Lindsjö
On 8/14/19 4:54 PM, Job Snijders wrote: Dear NANOG, Recently NTT investigated how to best monitor the visibility of our own and our subsidiaries’ IP resources in the BGP Default-Free Zone. We were specifically looking how to get near real-time alerts funneled into an actionable pipeline for

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread Rubens Kuhl
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:09 PM John Curran wrote: > On 14 Aug 2019, at 11:15 AM, Valdis Klētnieks > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 02:42:09 -, John Curran said: > > > >> You might want want to ask them why they are now a problem when they > weren’t > >> before (Also worth noting that

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread John Curran
On 14 Aug 2019, at 11:15 AM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 02:42:09 -, John Curran said: > >> You might want want to ask them why they are now a problem when they weren’t >> before (Also worth noting that many of these ISP's own contracts with their >> customers have

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread Valdis Klētnieks
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 02:42:09 -, John Curran said: > You might want want to ask them why they are now a problem when they weren’t > before (Also worth noting that many of these ISP's own contracts with their > customers have rather similar indemnification clauses.) Actually, it's probably

new BGP hijack & visibility tool “BGPalerter”

2019-08-14 Thread Job Snijders
Dear NANOG, Recently NTT investigated how to best monitor the visibility of our own and our subsidiaries’ IP resources in the BGP Default-Free Zone. We were specifically looking how to get near real-time alerts funneled into an actionable pipeline for our NOC & Operations department when BGP

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes Date: Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 02:01:01PM +0200 Quoting Bjørn Mork (bj...@mork.no): > Måns Nilsson writes: > > > /Måns, has 6 pairs 9/125 between garage and house at home. > > Now you made me worry that my single OM4 pair to the garden

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Bjørn Mork
Måns Nilsson writes: > /Måns, has 6 pairs 9/125 between garage and house at home. Now you made me worry that my single OM4 pair to the garden shed might be insufficient ;-) Bjørn

Re: RPKI adoption

2019-08-14 Thread Job Snijders
Dear all, On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:36:44AM +, John Curran wrote: > On 14 Aug 2019, at 2:26 AM, Matthew Petach wrote: > > ... > > Now, at the risk of bringing down the ire of the community on my > > head...ARIN could consider tying the elements together, at least for > > ARIN members. Add

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

2019-08-14 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes Date: Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 02:22:12PM -0400 Quoting Javier J (jav...@advancedmachines.us): > I'm working with a client site that has been hit twice, very close by > lightening. > > I did lots of electrical work/upgrades/grounding but now I

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread John Curran
On 14 Aug 2019, at 1:21 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: In message <06570278-e1ad-4bb0-a9fc-11a77bed7...@arin.net>, John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: Even so, we at ARIN are in the midst of a

Re: RPKI adoption

2019-08-14 Thread John Curran
On 14 Aug 2019, at 12:51 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > … > Just like to add kudos to John for being open and responsive on this list and > other lists to numerous issues and questions in regards to ARIN. Not many > CEOs are willing or able to respond as you do. Hank - Thanks! – as

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread John Curran
On 14 Aug 2019, at 2:26 AM, Matthew Petach wrote: > ... > Now, at the risk of bringing down the ire > of the community on my head...ARIN could > consider tying the elements together, at > least for ARIN members. Add the RPKI terms > into the RSA document. You need IP number > resources,

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread John Curran
On 14 Aug 2019, at 1:01 AM, William Herrin wrote: > ... > > I would observe that continued use at that point has been held > > to indicate agreement on your part [ref: Register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc., > > 356 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2004)] > > In which Verio admitted to the court that they knew

Re: provider email maintenance standard

2019-08-14 Thread Andrew Dampf
I ended up writing a flask app that parses provider maintenance emails and posts slack notifications at the start and end of the window. You can also extend it to take actions like drain/undrain traffic during windows. Right now the five supported providers are NTT, PacketFabric, EUNetworks, GTT,

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

2019-08-14 Thread Matthew Petach
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:44 PM John Curran wrote: > On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > ... > The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at around a grand total > of 15% worldwide. Ah yes, here it is... > > https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/ > > I've asked