Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
I've been ignoring this discussion because I feel this ship sailed
many years ago, and IPv6, like it or hate it, is the best way
forward we have.
A problem is that there is a cliff edge in front of you.
But, assuming you're expanding the address space,
I've been ignoring this discussion because I feel this ship sailed many
years ago, and IPv6, like it or hate it, is the best way forward we have.
But, assuming you're expanding the address space, the simplest solution is
to add the additional bits addresses at the end.
I.E. every existing /32 get
On Sun, 06 Oct 2019 17:47:24 -0400, b...@theworld.com said:
> All a strictly IPv4 only host/router would need to understand in that
> case is the IHL, which it does already, and how to interpret whatever
> flag/option is used to indicate the presence of additional address
> bits mostly to ignore i
On October 6, 2019 at 16:35 jhellent...@dataix.net (J. Hellenthal) wrote:
> And in which part of the header is this to be added ?
I assume you mean the additional address. The IHL provides for up to
60 bytes of IP header length. 20 bytes is needed for the usual IPv4
header so an additional 40 b
And in which part of the header is this to be added ?
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Oct 6, 2019, at 15:58, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
>
>> On October 6, 2019 at 15:18 mpal...@hezmatt.
On October 6, 2019 at 15:18 mpal...@hezmatt.org (Matt Palmer) wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 04:36:50PM -0400, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> >
> > On October 4, 2019 at 15:26 o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) wrote:
> > >
> > > OK… Let’s talk about how?
> > >
> > > How would you have mad
6 matches
Mail list logo