IPv6 is a lot more granular when it comes to geolocation data. It is also
very very unlikely that the block has been used before, and you never know
what the previous owner did or what geolocation/VPN blacklists it was added
to. Let me put it this way, this is a familiar song and dance for us, and
> IPv6 support by disney(using AWS) would obviate this issue.
ok. i give. exactly how? i mean technically.
randy
I sent an email there too, I think that this should be very apparent by
now, but IPv6 support by disney(using AWS) would obviate this issue.
Imagine if a multibillion dollar company can't implement ipv6, what hope do
the smaller ones have? /s
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 20:37, Aden Dragulescu wrote:
Try netad...@disneystreaming.com. Was on their whois.
--
*Aden Dragulescu*
fiberdrop, LLC
a...@fiberdrop.net
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:27 PM Michael Crapse wrote:
> There has been a continued flurry of trouble tickets from our eyeballs. I
> did find a contact cl...@disneystreaming.com that
There has been a continued flurry of trouble tickets from our eyeballs. I
did find a contact cl...@disneystreaming.com that i have reached out to in
hope that they can hear our pleas.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 16:53, Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
> We're seeing the same thing. Actually we saw it
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:32 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> My point was that Disney has a lock on much of the content kids love.
Which was, until Disney+, on Netflix.
https://www.theverge.com/2012/12/4/3727688/netflix-streaming-rights-new-disney-marvel-pixar-movies
> Netflix/HBO/AmazonPrime,
My point was that Disney has a lock on much of the content kids love.
Netflix/HBO/AmazonPrime, not so much.
So, the new eyeballs aren't going to be from parents watching different
shows, it'll be from parents watching their adult-ish stuff, while the kids
are happily ensconced with Disney+.
I
Myself and a few other ISPs are having our eyeballs complain about
disney+ saying that they're on a VPN. Does anyone have any idea, or who to
contact regarding this issue?
This is most likely improper geolocation databases. Anyone have an idea who
they use?
Mike
On 11/12/19 11:49 AM, Justin Krejci wrote:
I see the Disney service went live today, with some load issues
according to various news reports and down detector. Is it well known
where the newly released Disney+ streaming service content is sourced?
Are they using their own servers on AS22604 or
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:52:25PM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 12:53 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> > Different target audiences.
>
> That are already satisfied with existing services, so no new target
> audiences.
>
> > Now the parents can be watching "Good Omens" or
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 12:53 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> Different target audiences.
That are already satisfied with existing services, so no new target
audiences.
> Now the parents can be watching "Good Omens" or "Game of Thrones" on
> Netflix while the kids are streaming "The Lion King" on
On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 08:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> People can really only watch one thing at a time.
This is my thought also.
> Net streaming of the last mile
> is unlikely to change much. Just where that content is coming from
> may change.
Indeed.
Cheers,
b.
signature.asc
> On Nov 12, 2019, at 4:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> People can really only watch one thing at a time. Net streaming of the last
> mile
> is unlikely to change much. Just where that content is coming from may
> change.
This is my feeling as well. It may impact people whose models assume
>
> I guess the question is, will Disney content compel users who are not
> already streaming to start streaming?
>
Maybe, maybe not.
But what is 100% certain is that Disney knows how to make content that
people want to watch a LOT of , and Disney+ is going to be the only place
to get that
They can already stream different content to multiple devices simultaneously.
All this does is make some content that wasn’t available previously now
available.
People can really only watch one thing at a time. Net streaming of the last
mile
is unlikely to change much. Just where that content
Neither Good Omens nor Game of Thrones are available for streaming on
Netflix (you'll have to go to one of their competitors). Overall I tend
to agree with Brian that people's time and eyeballs are finite. As more
streaming services emerge, usage will simply be split between streaming
Different target audiences.
Now the parents can be watching "Good Omens" or "Game of Thrones" on
Netflix while the kids are streaming "The Lion King" on Disney+ streaming.
Instead of the whole family watching one show together, now we have
segmentation in the marketplace.
End result is more
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:26 -0500, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> I can foresee a lot of families subscribing to Netflix *and* Disney+
> because neither one has all the content the family wants to watch.
Absolutely. But the time spent watching Disney would *replace* (not be
in addition to, or
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:58:34 -0500, "Brian J. Murrell" said:
> I guess the question is, will Disney content compel users who are not
> already streaming to start streaming?
I can foresee a lot of families subscribing to Netflix *and* Disney+
because neither one has all the content the family
At 03:17 PM 12/11/2019, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Fair enough, in the cases where operators are Netflix OC partners and
might see a shift in network use from a Netflic OC appliance to
external their network to other streaming services.
But for an operator who doesn't have an OC Appliances, is
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 15:08 -0500, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
> Netflix has done a great job deploying OC Appliances. A Netflix
> user != Amazon, Hulu, etc...
Fair enough, in the cases where operators are Netflix OC partners and
might see a shift in network use from a Netflic OC appliance to
Netflix has done a great job deploying OC Appliances. A Netflix
user != Amazon, Hulu, etc...
At 02:58 PM 12/11/2019, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 19:49 +, Justin Krejci wrote:
>
> As the service grows in popularity, and its breadth of content and
> manageable price is
They have some improper geolocation for us, would be nice to have them
input to this chain.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:00 PM Brian J. Murrell
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 19:49 +, Justin Krejci wrote:
> >
> > As the service grows in popularity, and its breadth of content and
> > manageable
On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 19:49 +, Justin Krejci wrote:
>
> As the service grows in popularity, and its breadth of content and
> manageable price is likely to attract a lot of growth, I'd like to
> plan for any necessary augmentations to the network.
From the end-user/viewer network capacity
I saw various content being served from Akamai, Amazon, Fastly and Limelight so
far. I'm in Montreal.
Video is served from the following hosts:
vod-akc-na-central-1.media.dssott.com
vod-ftc-na-central-1.media.dssott.com
vod-ftc-na-east-1.media.dssott.com
vod-ftc-na-west-2.media.dssott.com
I see the Disney service went live today, with some load issues according to
various news reports and down detector. Is it well known where the newly
released Disney+ streaming service content is sourced? Are they using their own
servers on AS22604 or using one or more of the established CDNs?
Hello,
Following up on my lightning talk at NANOG77
(https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG77/2147/20191030_Robachevsky_Lightning_Talk_Next_v1.pdf),
here is the draft MANRS action set for CDN and Cloud operators:
https://www.manrs.org/cdn-cloud-providers/cfc-draft-action-set/
Your
27 matches
Mail list logo
