On 12/8/19 3:37 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 5, 2019, at 9:03 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
For SP-grade routers, there isn't "code" that needs to be added to combat
buffer bloat. All an admin has to do is cut back on the number of packet buffers on each
interface -- an
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 5, 2019, at 9:03 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> For SP-grade routers, there isn't "code" that needs to be added to combat
> buffer bloat. All an admin has to do is cut back on the number of packet
> buffers on each interface -- an interface setting, you see.
A
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
Once upon a time, Brandon Martin said:
> I guess what I'm getting at is that it sounds like, if you cannot
> source the content locally to the peering link, there's not likely
> to be an internal connection to the same site from somewhere else
> within the Akamai network to deliver that content an
* rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com (Rod Beck) [Sun 08 Dec 2019, 18:18 CET]:
Last time I spoke with an Akamai engineer many years ago the network was purely
transit. Is that evolving?
https://conference.apnic.net/data/41/ix_100-akamai-apricot2016-23feb2016_1456157526.pdf
Per those slides, PAIX
Last time I spoke with an Akamai engineer many years ago the network was purely
transit. Is that evolving?
From: NANOG on behalf of Jared Mauch
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 6:10 PM
To: Brandon Martin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Elephant in the room - A
Yep. Real estate must be one of their largest expenses and unlike bandwidth it
is not going down to price. 😃
From: Owen DeLong
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 6:07 PM
To: Rod Beck
Cc: Jared Mauch ; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai
My g
> On Dec 8, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
>
> I guess what I'm getting at is that it sounds like, if you cannot source the
> content locally to the peering link, there's not likely to be an internal
> connection to the same site from somewhere else within the Akamai network to
>
My guess (and it’s just this since I haven’t been inside Akamai for a couple of
years now) is that they are culling the less effective AANPs (from Akamai’s
perspective) in favor of redeploying the hardware to more effective locations
and/or to eliminate the cost of supporting/refreshing said har
thank you all for the wonderful feedback. We are in the process of
implementing https://www.ixpmanager.org/ as many recommended. IPv6 enabled.
We were able to connect 4 major data centers within san Juan metro using n
x 10G ring thanks to various partners and special thanks this time goes to
OSnet
On 12/8/19 10:58 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Not all content is suitable in all locations based on the physical security or
market situation. We have some content that can not be served, an example is
locations where there are licensing requirements (eg: ICP for China).
You will see a different mix
Let's take a minute and thank Jared for taking the time and responding.
thank you, Jared.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:58 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
> Not all content is suitable in all locations based on the physical
> security or market situation. We have some content that can not be served,
> an exa
> Have there been any fundamental change in their network architecture
> that might explain pulling these caches?
Maybe not network architecture, but what if the cache-to-content ratio
is dropping dramatically due to changes in consumer behavior and/or a
huge increase in the underlying content (su
Not all content is suitable in all locations based on the physical security or
market situation. We have some content that can not be served, an example is
locations where there are licensing requirements (eg: ICP for China).
You will see a different mix from our 20940 vs 16625 as well. Those h
On 12/7/19 7:19 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Please see my email on Friday where I outlined a few of the dynamics at play.
Akamai isn’t just one thing, it’s an entire basket of products that all have
their own resulting behaviors. This is why even though you may peer with us
directly you may not s
+100, and thanks to Jared.
-Ben
> On Dec 7, 2019, at 10:08 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> 
>
>> On 8/Dec/19 02:19, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>
>> I’ve been working hard to provide value to our AANP partners as well. I’ll
>> try to stop responding to the list at this point but don’t hesitate to
>> co
Taking boxes out of a network does not sound like 'emergent behavior' or
unintended consequences. Sounds like a policy change. Perhaps they are being
redeployed for better performance or perhaps shut down to lower costs. Or may
be the cost of transit for Akamai at the margin is less than the cos
17 matches
Mail list logo
