> On Jan 10, 2020, at 13:18 , Brandon Martin wrote:
>
> On 1/10/20 2:49 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>> The only way for me to send out traffic to bogons is if one my peers
>> announces a bogon prefix. Even if I did null route bogons, manually or
>> through the use of the Cymru service, a
Hey there
I am looking to hire someone / a company per project basis to help decom /
relocate couple cabinets (2-3 now 5-6 later) in LA (downtown) if you know
anyone/any company please contact me offlist. Local preferred
Mehmet
--
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903
Hi all,
/u/tambry on Reddit [0] posted about there being a sharp decline in IPv6
traffic on AMS-IX today.
A ~60G drop from peak looking at the graphs here:
https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/ipv6.html
Anyone know what happened or any ideas as to what the cause in such a sharp
drop might be?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:19 PM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> The idea isn't necessarily that you explicitly null-route them but
> rather that you block/ignore announcements of them on the assumption
> that malfeasants may be attepmting to squat on them or otherwise use
> them for some form of, well,
On 1/10/20 2:49 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
The only way for me to send out traffic to bogons is if one my peers
announces a bogon prefix. Even if I did null route bogons, manually or
through the use of the Cymru service, a peer could still announce a more
specific and override that.
The idea
This is why the one and only proposal I’ve seen that provides an actual useful
outcome for RPKI is a good idea…
RIRs issuing AS0 ROAs for unallocated/unassigned space in their inventories.
This way, it is tool-ised and the tool is run by the same organization that’s
doing the allocations and
Hello
What is the purpose of null routing bogons? As it is, my network being
default free zone, traffic to bogons will be returned to sender with no
route to host.
The only way for me to send out traffic to bogons is if one my peers
announces a bogon prefix. Even if I did null route bogons,
It's not about that this thread is about, nor why it is blacklisted. There is
an exploit (DDoS) that will ban even home connections from their networks.
On 10.01.2020 19:51:10, Mark Milhollan wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Octolus Development wrote:
>I run a VPN Business dedicated to protecting
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Octolus Development wrote:
I run a VPN Business dedicated to protecting clients from DDoS Attacks
that happens "all day long" on PlayStation Network. We need our VPN to
work on PSN, all our customers uses their service.
They are still investigating the problem, let's see
There are other options besides Vultr, that's just the one I've used the
most. Check out http://bgp.services.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 12:34 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 1/10/20 11:01 AM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> > Couldn't you just get a VPS with Vultr and set up BGP on it?
>
> The last time
On 1/10/20 11:01 AM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
Couldn't you just get a VPS with Vultr and set up BGP on it?
The last time I looked — it's been a while — doing that was not an
option for me.
I'll look again to see what the current status is.
Thank you for the pointer.
--
Grant. . . .
unix ||
FYI, this is a new one for me
-- Forwarded message -
From: Shopee SG Support
Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 12:10 PM
Subject: [Request Received] Re: De-bogonising 2a10::/12
To: r...@tajvar.io
Hi Ross Tajvar,
Thank you for contacting Shopee!
Your request has been received and is
Hello, NANOG!
Did someone say, “bogon?” :)
>> We want to remind everybody to update their bogon filters and allow routes
>> originating from 2a10::/12 in their network.
>
> I'd like to remind people not to bogonise unallocated, more downside
> than upside. Particularly if it's CLI jockey
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
Couldn't you just get a VPS with Vultr and set up BGP on it?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 11:44 AM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 1/10/20 10:36 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> > Much safer, but for me personally, still more downside than upside.
>
> Fair.
>
> I wish that I could get my hands on a DFZ BGP
On 1/10/20 10:36 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
Much safer, but for me personally, still more downside than upside.
Fair.
I wish that I could get my hands on a DFZ BGP feed. !R to unprovisioned
IPs. }:-)
But that's not easily accessible for mere mortals.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 19:32, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
> What's your opinion on things like Team Cymru's BGP Bogon feed?
Much safer, but for me personally, still more downside than upside.
--
++ytti
On 1/10/20 10:07 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
I'd like to remind people not to bogonise unallocated, more downside than
upside. Particularly if it's CLI jockey network, no one will update the
config once you change your employer. Even if it's toolised, once that
tool breaks, no one will fix it, if
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:17 PM Tom Hill wrote:
> On 09/01/2020 17:09, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> > But at least Cogent is not a security and/or anti-spam vendor (or is
> > it?). A security services company (iThreat) spammed all IANA gTLD
> > contacts this week, with the ever lasting excuse of "it's
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 16:34, Nikolas Pediaditis wrote:
> We want to remind everybody to update their bogon filters and allow routes
> originating from 2a10::/12 in their network.
I'd like to remind people not to bogonise unallocated, more downside
than upside. Particularly if it's CLI jockey
On 09/01/2020 17:09, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> But at least Cogent is not a security and/or anti-spam vendor (or is
> it?). A security services company (iThreat) spammed all IANA gTLD
> contacts this week, with the ever lasting excuse of "it's opt-out".
Everlasting, unless you're operating under the
Dear colleagues,
A few months ago the RIPE NCC became the first RIR to receive an additional /12
IPv6 allocation (2a10::/12) from IANA.
We will soon begin to delegate space from this IPv6 block to LIRs. Prior to
this, in order to improve routability and minimise the risk of filtering, the
Hi,
yep, that's the right way to work cleanly, just add a «special patch panel»
instead of dealing with plenty of additional wires.
We use such method to do 10GE with routers modules full of QSFP+ configured as
4x10. On our side we went for a modular Huber+Suhner solution, 1 U with a
maximum
Hello Mark,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 13:39, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> So just an update on this.
>
> We've since completed the roll-out of dropping Invalids on eBGP sessions with
> customers as well.
>
> It also included some Cisco ME3600X routers that will ultimately be replaced
> this year by
So just an update on this.
We've since completed the roll-out of dropping Invalids on eBGP sessions
with customers as well.
It also included some Cisco ME3600X routers that will ultimately be
replaced this year by Cisco ASR920 routers.
All in all, no major drama. 2 main issues I'd like to
Dear NANOG
Happy 2020 I hope it's extremely successful for everyone within the NANOG
community.
Now anyone who didn't enjoy 2019 and is looking for a new start I am on the
hunt for a Data Centre Experienced Network Engineer based in Melbourne
Australia. (Master of BGP, eVPN, VXLAN, IS-IS,
Exactly that.
I run a VPN Business dedicated to protecting clients from DDoS Attacks that
happens "all day long" on PlayStation Network. We need our VPN to work on PSN,
all our customers uses their service.
They are still investigating the problem, let's see what the results will be.
On
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, at 00:05, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 8 January, 2020 14:35. Octolus Development
> wrote:
>
> Stop doing business with Criminal Organizations (SONY). Problem solved.
You (as a provider) may not do any business with them, but your customers may,
and will
> On Jan 6, 2020, at 07:53 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 10:30 AM William Herrin wrote:
>
>> If it's not written in to your contract, it's a breach of contract. Either
>> way it's a deceitfully imposed surcharge, not a state tax. Virginia does not
>> tax the sale
29 matches
Mail list logo
