On 5/7/20 5:54 PM, Brandon Jackson via NANOG wrote:
> I have seen (Charter) and heard quite a few run RIP or some other routing
> protocol on the CPE.
Yep, it's RIP. They don't support IPv6 on this either. I've been asking for
IPv6 since 2006, it's always next year.
--
Bryan Fields
I do not believe it is a GRE tunnel.
I have seen (Charter) and heard quite a few run RIP or some other routing
protocol on the CPE.
Though I have not seen anything specific about Comcast specifically.
Brandon Jackson
On Thu, May 7, 2020, 16:54 Brandon Martin wrote:
> On 5/7/20 4:49 PM,
That probably depends on your country. Here nothing less than 100 Mbps is
acceptable :-). Just pointing out that is not actually possible without
rebuilding.
To his original query I would suggest simply using CPEs with VoIP ports and
skip analog voice.
Regards,
Baldur
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at
On 5/7/20 4:49 PM, Javier Gutierrez Guerra wrote:
Just wanted to reach out and get an idea how is people managing customers with
static Ips, more specifically on Docsis networks where the customer could be
moved between cmts's when a node is split
Around here, Comcast seems to provision a
Hi there,
Just wanted to reach out and get an idea how is people managing customers with
static Ips, more specifically on Docsis networks where the customer could be
moved between cmts's when a node is split
Thanks in advance for all responses,
Javier Gutierrez Guerra
Baldur,
According to Nick Edwards, the OP, the main application is voice, which most
any DSLAM will handle easily, and solve his IP PBX line consolidation problem.
Instead of physical lines into the PBX, he can use the integrated DSLAM SIP
calling capability as the IP PBX interface. Given that
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:05 PM Brandon Martin
wrote:
> On 5/7/20 12:03 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> > In the OP’s case however, the copper plant is private, and wholly owned
> and already in operation. So surely in that situation fiber would be much
> more expensive to dig and trench.
>
> Indeed, I
On 5/7/20 12:03 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> In the OP’s case however, the copper plant is private, and wholly owned and
> already in operation. So surely in that situation fiber would be much more
> expensive to dig and trench.
Indeed, I was responding to Ohta's comments regarding copper vs.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:14 AM Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> Investment for FTTH is 10 times or more than that for plain DSL.
>
>
We are assuming the copper plant is already there otherwise I will
respectfully disagree.
However the economic is not as simple as you
On 5/7/20 12:16 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
It looks like you shouldn't attempt to access that site over HTTPS, just
via plain HTTP. Do you have any official bit of documentation
that links to the HTTPS version?
Given the prevalence of opportunistic upgrades to TLS these days, I'd
argue that
* drew.wea...@thenap.com (Drew Weaver) [Thu 07 May 2020, 16:50 CEST]:
I contacted their support and CS but if anyone knows someone at
either organization it appears that the certificate for
downloadcenter.mcafee.com Is invalid.
Has been this way for a while.
It looks like you shouldn't
> Brandon Martin said:
> In most of the USA, it's simply not cost-feasible to get access to that
> unless you either are the ILEC or are a well-established CLEC from a long
> time ago.
Brandon,
In the OP’s case however, the copper plant is private, and wholly owned and
already in
On 5/7/20 5:13 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Investment for FTTH is 10 times or more than that for plain DSL.
Only if you're comparing entirely new copper plant to existing copper
plant (including drops), in my experience. If you compare greenfield to
greenfield, the cost of fiber to the prem
I contacted their support and CS but if anyone knows someone at either
organization it appears that the certificate for downloadcenter.mcafee.com Is
invalid.
Has been this way for a while.
-Drew
Baldur Norddahl wrote:
I own a FTTH based ISP so I believe I know exactly what the cost are. As
it is we are smashing the copper based competition. A copper plant is
not free to run and either it can not deliver the expected speed or it
requires significant investments to get the loop length
15 matches
Mail list logo
