> OK Randy. How about a suggestion that is useful.
>>> I’m leaning toward DS-lite and NAT444
>> a great path. fork lift all cpe and cgn in the core. the vendors'
>> dream
$subject. map-e. ... the list is long. ds-lite is close to the bottom
of it, except if you are a vendor salesperson.
On 7/24/20 10:46 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
OK Randy. How about a suggestion that is useful.
My approach thus far absent CPE support for transition mechanisms has
been native IPv6 across the board + NAT444, but I use a VRF to
regionalize the NAT444 routing and bring it to a semi-centralized
OK Randy. How about a suggestion that is useful.
- Brian
> On Jul 24, 2020, at 8:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> I’m leaning toward DS-lite and NAT444
>
> a great path. fork lift all cpe and cgn in the core. the vendors'
> dream
>
> randy
> I’m leaning toward DS-lite and NAT444
a great path. fork lift all cpe and cgn in the core. the vendors'
dream
randy
Don was a great guy. I learnt a few things about Flowspec from him.
Sorry to see him go.
Regards,
Jakob.
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:22:45 +
From: "Dobbins, Roland"
It is with a heavy heart that I must relate the news that Don Smith, formerly
of CenturyLink and
It appears there's not a need to roundtrip through email to verify, so.. like:
userid: bernhard.ebb...@wcom.com
passwd: pickagreatonehere
and.. go along to the map to do your searchings ?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:26 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
> We've tried this, disabled google because the
Hi all,
perhaps someone on this list interested in taking over binfiles.net?
From time-to-time we all run a wget with some binfiles to test our
peering-partners or transit uplinks. A central place to select some
binfiles matching those networks would be a nice feature, somewhat
similar to
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
I’ve gotten a lot of great feedback and want to restate some of my thoughts for
further discussion:
1. It seems like the MAP-T is still in an initial phase of
development/production. I’ve seen a few other people mentioning it, but it is
early in deployment today.
2. When working with smaller
On 24/Jul/20 18:41, William Herrin wrote:
> How you parse it depends on your intention when quoting my interview
> story with a response about exhibiting curiosity. It was either full
> agreement about the value of curiousity or a pointed retort about the
> difference between curiosity and
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:44 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 24/Jul/20 09:32, William Herrin wrote:
> > Choosing not to mash one's fingers with a hammer is not an absence of
> > curiosity about carpentry. It's merely an understanding that doing
> > carpentry well involves -not- mashing one's fingers
We've tried this, disabled google because the spam came from 1000s of Gmail
accounts actually, also had the same issue with Facebook end disabled
that.. it's not like we are not trying to solve this, one idea was to
create an account demo/demo and let people just login with that without
requiring
You are welcome to get the source code, and run the code yourself without
any login and build the database we've built and show us how it's done :) I
am confident you will see our challenge right there.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:12 AM Tom Hill wrote:
> On 24/07/2020 15:58, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
Isn't that the Level3 Colo? Everyone has a POP there.
On 7/24/2020 9:27 AM, Pete Rohrman wrote:
Looking for an Internet provider that is in the Level3/CenturyLink
space (3rd floor) in 111 8th Ave, New York City. There are plenty of
providers in the building, but I'm trying to avoid riser
Comments inline.
> On Jul 14, 2020, at 3:35 PM, Andrey Khomyakov
> wrote:
>
> I was once asked at a FANG interview how I would affect incoming traffic
> using BGP. I listed the usual offenders like AS path and med. He kept asking
> how else, to which after pondering I said that I cant think
Well,
I think some are "way too angry" over this.
( I think there is more pressing issues to get angry about first,
don't you think? )
Like the Mehmet said, that's the solution implemented at the
moment. While my plate being full, Google reCcaptcha v3, could be a
easy fix
I thought this may be of interest to some of the network operators here on the
NANOG list.
I am reaching out to solicit interest in participating in the development of a
new technical paper from the Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group
(BITAG). In September we will begin work on a short
On 24/07/2020 15:54, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
> If you want to post to this list asking for help, then refusing the
> help you get because you don't have the energy or inclination to use
> one of the suggestions, then move on.
>
> I'd suggest that you switch from single malt to decaf.
I'd suggest
On 24/07/2020 15:58, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Infrapedia is 100% free , all code open source, platform made for
> engineers by engineers.
> https://github.com/infrapedia
>
> I am sure there are lots of room to improve. I appreciate everyone
> supporting it. If you want to look at the code and help
Paranoid much?
Mehemet is an upstanding guy doing the right thing as well as his site of
countless very useful information.
But considering this wasn’t even for you ... maybe you have a better solution ?
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to
Infrapedia is 100% free , all code open source, platform made for engineers
by engineers.
https://github.com/infrapedia
I am sure there are lots of room to improve. I appreciate everyone
supporting it. If you want to look at the code and help implement a way to
block spam bots, without
Nobody is forcing you to sign up. If you want to
use it, sign up. If you don't, then don't sign up.
If you want to post to this list asking for help,
then refusing the help you get because you don't
have the energy or inclination to use one of the suggestions, then move on.
I'd suggest
On 24/07/2020 15:32, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> No harvesting of personal data.
>
> This was a requirement for us to prevent spam when requesting quotes
> from partner networks.
So your partners demand that you store and process my personal data
(anything that can be used to identify an individual)
No harvesting of personal data.
This was a requirement for us to prevent spam when requesting quotes from
partner networks.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 07:22 Tom Hill wrote:
> On 24/07/2020 15:16, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > and?
> >
>
> Meh. I haven't got the energy.
>
> But generally speaking, if
Very well said Roland.
He cared greatly about this community and was always willing to help
others. I personally would not be where I am today without his effort
and caring.
Thank you Don, I will miss you greatly.
--John
On 7/23/20 5:22 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
It is with a heavy heart
On 24/07/2020 15:16, Mike Hammett wrote:
> and?
>
Meh. I haven't got the energy.
But generally speaking, if you're going to harvest personal data, be
more honest about it.
--
Tom
and?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Hill"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 9:13:22 AM
Subject: Re: Internet Providers in 111 8th Ave, NYC
On
On 24/07/2020 14:45, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
> This might be of assistance….
No, it'll force you to sign-up/sign-in before providing any "assistance".
--
Tom
This might be of assistance….
https://live.infrapedia.com/app
> On Jul 24, 2020, at 08:27, Pete Rohrman wrote:
>
> Looking for an Internet provider that is in the Level3/CenturyLink space (3rd
> floor) in 111 8th Ave, New York City. There are plenty of providers in the
> building, but I'm
On 22/07/2020 22:15, Brian Johnson wrote:
> Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking
> for feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core
> design. My concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network.
> The BR will have to do overloaded NAT
Looking for an Internet provider that is in the Level3/CenturyLink space
(3rd floor) in 111 8th Ave, New York City. There are plenty of
providers in the building, but I'm trying to avoid riser costs.
Feel free to pass this along to your sales team, and if so, give them my
direct number 212
On 24/Jul/20 09:59, Peter Kristolaitis wrote:
>
> I would suggest that companies who follow FAANG-type development
> models actually value both expertise and curiosity, and also throw in
> the ability and willingness to rapidly iterate. Certainly one can
> search Google for solutions to
On 2020-07-24 3:06 a.m., Mark Tinka wrote:
On 24/Jul/20 00:26, William Herrin wrote:
Many moons ago, I interviewed at Google. During one of the afternoon
sessions the interviewer and I spent about half an hour spitballing
approaches for system monitoring problem at scale. I no longer
remember
On 24/Jul/20 09:53, Wayne Bouchard wrote:
>
> Well, I take the point of his comment to be not being curious to the
> point of inadvertantly doing damage to something that you were better
> off leaving alone until you found someone who could clue you in to the
> particulars. There are plenty of
I feel like real estate space in that part of the city is way
over-valued to be used for MJ...
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:38 PM Norman Jester wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2020, at 7:52 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:20:10PM -0500, Aaron Wendel wrote:
> >> We
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 09:44:36AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 24/Jul/20 09:32, William Herrin wrote:
>
> > Choosing not to mash one's fingers with a hammer is not an absence of
> > curiosity about carpentry. It's merely an understanding that doing
> > carpentry well involves -not-
On 24/Jul/20 09:32, William Herrin wrote:
> Choosing not to mash one's fingers with a hammer is not an absence of
> curiosity about carpentry. It's merely an understanding that doing
> carpentry well involves -not- mashing one's fingers with a hammer.
You mean like not poking your finger into
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:08 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
> I prefer to have staff that are burdened with being curious, rather than
> staff who think they don't. After all, all the information is already
> out there. Having experience is just as important as being diligent to
> obtain it.
Choosing not
On 24/Jul/20 00:26, William Herrin wrote:
> Many moons ago, I interviewed at Google. During one of the afternoon
> sessions the interviewer and I spent about half an hour spitballing
> approaches for system monitoring problem at scale. I no longer
> remember the details. With a little over 15
Adding a route object in RADB doesn't need to verify ownership of the IP
block.
You can send a removal request to RADB admins and their upstream, they will
be glad to remove it.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:05 PM Randy Carpenter
wrote:
>
> I am working with a client that has recently purchased
I am working with a client that has recently purchased and transferred an IPv4
block.
Sometime in between when the purchase and research was done and when the
transfer was actually complete, an entity in Asia started illicitly announcing
a larger block that includes the block in question.
41 matches
Mail list logo
